GWX: I think you should probably move the S-class to the over to the US side! - Page 3

JU_88 · 01-13-07, 07:32 AM

It has an identity crisis but it definately isnt the british one..

Maybe the US would have given some to the Brits on lend lease, but i doubt it -since the British had lots of their own subs already and most of them were superior to the little S boats. The Brits would have wanted more Destroyers and CVs instead.

US S-class (Looks like Serg's S-class to me -minus the deck gun)

British S-class, similar spec to the type VII Uboats, not as fast on the surface though and no stern tube until the third revision of the sub. looks nothing like the S-class in GWX though.

No biggy, just a little nit pick to bear in mind for the update.

01-13-07, 07:32 AM	#1
JU_88 Silent Hunter Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: UK Posts: 3,803 Downloads: 11 Uploads: 0	GWX: I think you should probably move the S-class to the over to the US side! It has an identity crisis but it definately isnt the british one.. Maybe the US would have given some to the Brits on lend lease, but i doubt it -since the British had lots of their own subs already and most of them were superior to the little S boats. The Brits would have wanted more Destroyers and CVs instead. US S-class (Looks like Serg's S-class to me -minus the deck gun) British S-class, similar spec to the type VII Uboats, not as fast on the surface though and no stern tube until the third revision of the sub. looks nothing like the S-class in GWX though. No biggy, just a little nit pick to bear in mind for the update.