On Health

[Skybird]

Then you already have an established health condition, and then I indeed do not object to any further diagnosis tools, because I am not qualified to do so.

I was referring to the fact that we have a big industry now that lives of telling people to endlessly run from this to that screening for early recognition of mostly cancers. May it be skin cancer, may it be female breast cancer, may it be male prostate cancer, may it be colon cancer. And for all these screening methods in the past years first a few then a growing number of doctors have raised doubts on their usefulness, and also pointing out that we have more and more an over-treating in the meaning of that patients are made mad and afraid while in fact their "cancer" indeed often may never have caused problems, while the tretamenet of a "diagbosed" probklem also often causes harms and sideffects that are kept under the carpet usually.


A few month ago I heard a lecture by a German expert who has written a whole book about this, and he said that he by now in principle advises people NOT to do screenings, because too many people get overtreated, suffer from side-effects, the total number of patient benefitting is too marginal compared to the damage done from overtreatment, sideffects from treatments can even weigh heavier than the "benefit" of the treatment itself, and he concluded that the only screening that he could somewhat recommend were that for colon cancer - not because it is especially helpful or statistically relevant, but because here the chance to suffer from damages in the treatment of polypes - snipping them off during the screening - is relatively low.

Believe me, he had some stunning numbers and statistics that really make you raise the eyebrows about what the screening inbustry tells us all the time. Its business. BIG business. Like everything in "health" politics these days. Its not about health. Its about money.

I tried to find it again, but could not find it, it was a 30 minute monologue during a moderated stage forum. When he was done, the others did not know what to say anymore. I did not know him, so I even do not remember the name anymore. Too bad.

Doctors advice men to test PSA frequently, even if they have no symptoms and no health complaints. But doing so even without a cause is indeed increasingly criticised, and it is the reason why in Germany health insurrances do not regularly pay for it if there is no initial suspicion justifying to do it, AFAIK. PSA values alone can be misleading.


You already have a confirmed health problem, you say, that is something different then, and on that I cannot comment.


I would advice to check out the benefit of iodine, however. In societies where they eat plenty of iodine food and at least still have plenty of non-Western diet, breast and prostate cancer are practically unknown. Asian regions on my mind, namely Japan. I have red that prostate enlargements have even been shown to dissappear again when going into iodine supplementation. However, iodine is a bit complex a topic, as I often have said. Never take it without taking selenium as well, its like Vitamine D plus K2 plus Magnesium, it should always go hand in hand. Iodine and Selenium belong together when supplementing. Else there is a real chance to cause damage by an autoimmune reaction, leading to thyroidites ("Hashimoto"). And even if it would end in that - you still would need iodine like you still need oxygene when suffering from pneumonia. I know that some doctors think of prostate problems as a symptom for iodine deficiency .

[Skybird]

Big Food is a 3.2 trillion dollars market.

Big Pharma is a 1.27 trillion market.

None of the two want you healthy.

These are the two enemies that everybody is threatened by.

[Jimbuna]

[Skybird]

[Skybird]

its for over two years that i mention mitochondrial medicine as the coming big topic in medical science.

sunlight. uvb for vitamine d production, infrared for interferone and melatonin production.

[Skybird]

[Skybird]

[Jimbuna]

[Skybird]

he co-founded this as a non profit alternative to the corrupted existing diabetes associations.

[Skybird]

Oatmeal...? "slow released sugar. Some people say Its not as bad as Lucky Charmes, because its a 'complex carbohydrate'. It is less bad. That does not make it good."

https://youtube.com/shorts/YRhRJWzP3...Ta85SD4diJDpW9

[Skybird]

[Skybird]

carnivore on a lower end budget.

its wayyy better than any ultraprocessed food, pasta, bread, veggies, oatmeal, cereals...

[Jimbuna]

Love a hot dog in a bun with onions and tomato ketchup

[Skybird]

Both the EU and the UN have worded explicite declarations and plans that include that nutrition and diet is now exclusively seen as a function of supporting planetary climate. This means the biochemical necessities of healthy and species-adequate diet have been explicitly eradicated. They are intentionally ignored, and not ignoring them by for example insisting on meat consumption not only is already now heavily socially sanctioned, but gets increasingly criminalised and will be politically suppressed and persecuted, whole nations with meat production will get sanctioned and threatened with trade wars and boycots if they do not comply. In the brave new world man eats not because of biochemical and metabolical need, but because of ideological command. Ideology trumps biology. Like with gender madness.

This is a crime against humanity that lets even the Covid vaccine policies pale in comparison.

It also will not help to improve soil quality, but will speed up the annihilation of the little remaining "quality" there still is, and that already now is practically non-existent due to the overkill done every ear with the great floods of fertilizers and pesticides. Its niot fertile famrland anymore, is sterile dirt, nothing else. You need plenty of fertilizers to make something grow on it, and with every cycle, you make things worse. And thios of course doe snot mean that what grows on it is fully naturally rich in nutrients anymore. It isnt. Its just a pale shadow of what it once may have been, decades and centuries ago.

Want to feed the people healthily and improve soil? Ask nature herself how to do it, she knows it better than any hedgefond, Christian cult, financial investor, industrial lobbyist, fanatical ideologist.

Hint: cows, buffalo, cattle dont eat corn, oil seeds and soy, they eat GRASS. Just that, simple GRASS.

Look at Australia: where they want to preserve the few fertile soils they have, they run lifestock and cattle on it. Where you just have farming, soil depletes and gets further eroded by sun and wind.

Then the lies told about water wasted for lifestock. They count rain into that, by that multiplying the claimed water investment needed for lifestock by a factor around 20-25. While the rain would fall anyway, no matter on what sort of ground: concrete, field or meadow. Lying a.h. they are, manipulative, cheating, underhanded.

You must not waste fertile ground for producing "food" like soy, corn and and oil seeds for cattle, if these animals do not depend on them anyway, and in fact are designed to eat - GRASS. No cow is desoigned to eat soy or wheat or corn. Simply grass. But there is no money in that, while rich profits are made with producing all that corn and soy and other toxic dirt. Thery hide this by claiming environmental and philantropic reasons, but that all is just lies. And most people buy it, willingly, since they want something to positively believe in. And since we in the West have stopped to beoeif in God and dismantled our cultural traditrions an drleiugous heritage, we now beloeive inbtio the surrogate, we believe in "left" and "gender justice" and "eco". The devil is inside the house, and oh look - he is green.

Turn all farmland into meadows. Put cattle on it, not too much, not too few. If in need for more cattle: turn even more farmland into meadows. Then let nature do its way. She does it this way since millions of years.



Heck, even chicken are not healthy if exclusively eating plant based, they need to have their dose of animal protein from bugs and larvas.


They are committing the biggest crime in the history of mankind with their clever policies. And it will cost hundreds of millions if not billions their health, well-being and full natural life expectancy.

We live in a dictatorship of money-hungry, unscrupulous poisoners. The scale of their now planned crime borders planetary genocide. And they make profits from that, thats why they do it.

The younger ones cannot know all this, they got indoctrinated from the first day they made their first steps into the Kindergarden ( a garden is a place where you farm something, right...). But this does not make them any less dangerous and menacing to us all, since they were turned into uneducated, pre-programmed willing drones pushing the crusade for veganism.

Yes, you get it right: I hated Kindergarden when I was small. I am thankful that my parents never forced me to go there if I did not wish to do so. Damn collectivism training, it only makes you dull and socially submissive in your head.

[Skybird]