![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#16 | |
Ace of the Deep
![]() Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Cologne, Germany
Posts: 1,227
Downloads: 8
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
The US just have normal subs who could fire Harpoons or TASMs (which are out of service). Nowadays there are no western ASMs that are suitable to be fired from a sub (in my oppinion). They don't have enough range and are too slow so they can be killed way to easy (assumed that the missile is detected early enough). I think if western navies need a sub-launched missile it must be a long range super sonic missile which would need a whole new sub type to be launched from. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Sub Test Pilot
|
![]()
Not realy you could can launch them, and if your taking on say an udaloy or even a frigate of the russian navy air defence is a big thing for them, the kirov has three types of SAM missile systems not including the two types of CIWS.
The exocet is a good missile however lacks the range and by the time the sub is in position to fire there will already be torpedos in the water. Harpoons and TASM are way too slow and the harpoons warhead's would just bounce off most warships anyway, the TASM would be a good mid range missile if it could go faster than mach 1.5 but the USN doesnt want to develope it. To be honest the USN has realy shot themselves in the foot big time, if TASM and harpoons are defunct what on earth are thier ships going to defend themselves with if they ever got into a sea battle you cant rely on the 5inch guns cause they wont go further than 12 miles, and bare in mind most enamys who have ASM's will be firing from the 50nm mark.
__________________
DONT FORGET if you like a post to nominate it by using the blue diamond ![]() ![]() ![]() Find out about Museum Ships here: https://www.museumships.us/ Flickr for all my pictures: https://www.flickr.com/photos/131313936@N03/ Navy general board articles: https://www.navygeneralboard.com/author/aegis/ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]()
Because any opposing navy will find them selves with an SSN guning for them. Also most us navy ships AFAIK work in a CBG which should pic up the bad guys outside of missile range and thus allow an airstrike on them..
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Sub Test Pilot
|
![]()
Plans can be easily shot down, and yes the USN uses the "protection in numbers" tactics as did the soviets, in a way it is a good tactic but in others its best to have that ASM there just in case.
__________________
DONT FORGET if you like a post to nominate it by using the blue diamond ![]() ![]() ![]() Find out about Museum Ships here: https://www.museumships.us/ Flickr for all my pictures: https://www.flickr.com/photos/131313936@N03/ Navy general board articles: https://www.navygeneralboard.com/author/aegis/ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Admiral
![]() Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 2,021
Downloads: 9
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I actually agree. US weapons are VERY out of date. Even our carrier groups are vulnrable to an Oscar with the ss-n-19 and an effective remote passive sensors. All it needs to do is wait until the Nimitz is close, too far in range for any quick action by the Arlegh (i think thats how its spelled
![]() ![]()
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
XO
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Thuringia
Posts: 429
Downloads: 16
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Nice pic, showing the anechoic coating of a Type U212.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 | |
Naval Royalty
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 1,185
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
Planesman
![]() Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 185
Downloads: 13
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Harpoon is not defunct, sub-launched harpoons are. There is a difference.
I am unqualified to comment on surface action group tactics. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]()
Whilst also a fan of the Russian sub force I also think the effectiveness of the SS-N-19 is overstated. Sure on paper it looks good but how often are these things test fired in realistic exercises.
All we have is the official Russian blurb on them which of course is going to be complementary, just like any nations blurb of its own weapons systems. It would be folly for the US to ignore the potential threat but at the same time Kapitan, until they are tested in combat or there is some independent verifiable records of such tests I think you are being a bit overenthusiastic. It might just be better to sneak in and send some torps from up below instead of having to rely on offboard sensors to give you a position fix which will become old quickly esp if not updated regularly. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
Sub Test Pilot
|
![]()
Its not uncommon to have them test most of thier missiles at least twice a year which is more than the americans acctualy do.
Kursk had tested one of her 24 SS-N-19 missiles before she was lost in spingex and wintex i would not be surprised if they are firing 3 or 4 of them in tests.
__________________
DONT FORGET if you like a post to nominate it by using the blue diamond ![]() ![]() ![]() Find out about Museum Ships here: https://www.museumships.us/ Flickr for all my pictures: https://www.flickr.com/photos/131313936@N03/ Navy general board articles: https://www.navygeneralboard.com/author/aegis/ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 | ||
Ace of the Deep
![]() Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Cologne, Germany
Posts: 1,227
Downloads: 8
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
I agree: the sail looks a bit odd but the rest looks normal to me. What makes you think that the 212 class looks sci-fi? |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
Admiral
![]() Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 2,021
Downloads: 9
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
its got a sci-fi engine. its a hydrogen powered battery, like the new experimental cars
![]()
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
Ace of the Deep
![]() Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Cologne, Germany
Posts: 1,227
Downloads: 8
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I know, but SeaQueen said that the sub LOOKED sci-fi. Since you can't see the hydrogen powered batteries...
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
Admiral
![]() Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 2,021
Downloads: 9
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
.....you can just imagine that they are there
![]() ![]()
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 | |
Naval Royalty
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 1,185
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|