SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Modern-Era Subsims > Dangerous Waters
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-27-06, 04:05 PM   #16
hyperion2206
Ace of the Deep
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Cologne, Germany
Posts: 1,227
Downloads: 8
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kapitan
SSGN such as an oscar are designed to carry anti ship missiles its thier primary role.

Soviet and russian doctorine is to overwhelm enamy radar but masses and masses of missiles, each oscar can carry 24 nuclear armed super sonic SS-N-19 anti ship missiles and each flys at mach 2+

The missile if fired from around 40 miles away you would have incredibly little time to react by the time you classify the contact 24 are headed your way and by the time you fired the missile to intercept they are within 5 miles of hitting you.

CIWS is totaly useless against them from the time it gets into range its about 0.0000468 seconds to impact, each missile is fully capible of mission killing a carrier or sinking a DDG out right, even such ships as aegis cruiser and destroyers would have a rough time trying to swat them all.

However aegis is now so advanced that i wouldnt doubt that they would stop all but a few and the oscar war time doctrine is to either hunt in groups of 2 or 3 aided by and escorting akula or victor so that could mean 72 missiles heading towards you not including tube launched ASM missiles.

now days though the standard patrol is done alone one oscar is fully capible of holding up a battle group for a day or two untill back up arrives, id say that with all them missiles flying around aegis may have a hard time im not saying it couldnt do the job its a very effective and powerful system but i would say it may have a rough time.
I understand that it seems to be working fine for the Russians, but what about the US?
The US just have normal subs who could fire Harpoons or TASMs (which are out of service). Nowadays there are no western ASMs that are suitable to be fired from a sub (in my oppinion). They don't have enough range and are too slow so they can be killed way to easy (assumed that the missile is detected early enough).

I think if western navies need a sub-launched missile it must be a long range super sonic missile which would need a whole new sub type to be launched from.
hyperion2206 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-06, 04:36 PM   #17
Kapitan
Sub Test Pilot
 
Kapitan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK + Canada
Posts: 7,130
Downloads: 77
Uploads: 7


Default

Not realy you could can launch them, and if your taking on say an udaloy or even a frigate of the russian navy air defence is a big thing for them, the kirov has three types of SAM missile systems not including the two types of CIWS.

The exocet is a good missile however lacks the range and by the time the sub is in position to fire there will already be torpedos in the water.

Harpoons and TASM are way too slow and the harpoons warhead's would just bounce off most warships anyway, the TASM would be a good mid range missile if it could go faster than mach 1.5 but the USN doesnt want to develope it.

To be honest the USN has realy shot themselves in the foot big time, if TASM and harpoons are defunct what on earth are thier ships going to defend themselves with if they ever got into a sea battle you cant rely on the 5inch guns cause they wont go further than 12 miles, and bare in mind most enamys who have ASM's will be firing from the 50nm mark.
__________________
DONT FORGET if you like a post to nominate it by using the blue diamond



Find out about Museum Ships here: https://www.museumships.us/

Flickr for all my pictures: https://www.flickr.com/photos/131313936@N03/

Navy general board articles: https://www.navygeneralboard.com/author/aegis/
Kapitan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-06, 04:50 PM   #18
XabbaRus
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 5,330
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0


Default

Because any opposing navy will find them selves with an SSN guning for them. Also most us navy ships AFAIK work in a CBG which should pic up the bad guys outside of missile range and thus allow an airstrike on them..
__________________
XabbaRus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-06, 05:00 PM   #19
Kapitan
Sub Test Pilot
 
Kapitan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK + Canada
Posts: 7,130
Downloads: 77
Uploads: 7


Default

Plans can be easily shot down, and yes the USN uses the "protection in numbers" tactics as did the soviets, in a way it is a good tactic but in others its best to have that ASM there just in case.
__________________
DONT FORGET if you like a post to nominate it by using the blue diamond



Find out about Museum Ships here: https://www.museumships.us/

Flickr for all my pictures: https://www.flickr.com/photos/131313936@N03/

Navy general board articles: https://www.navygeneralboard.com/author/aegis/
Kapitan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-06, 05:17 PM   #20
ASWnut101
Admiral
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 2,021
Downloads: 9
Uploads: 0
Default

I actually agree. US weapons are VERY out of date. Even our carrier groups are vulnrable to an Oscar with the ss-n-19 and an effective remote passive sensors. All it needs to do is wait until the Nimitz is close, too far in range for any quick action by the Arlegh (i think thats how its spelled ) Burke, Ticonds, or OHP's. one shot to the Control tower will ground the jets, then the Nimitz is a floating mile long target(that means for tin can). US very desperatily needs a Mach 1.5+ sub-launch missile with atleast a 1000kg warhead.
__________________

ASWnut101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-06, 01:25 AM   #21
Smaragdadler
XO
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Thuringia
Posts: 429
Downloads: 16
Uploads: 0
Default

Nice pic, showing the anechoic coating of a Type U212.

Smaragdadler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-06, 06:49 AM   #22
SeaQueen
Naval Royalty
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 1,185
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Smaragdadler
Nice pic, showing the anechoic coating of a Type U212.
Is it just me or does that sub just look TOTALLY sci-fi?
SeaQueen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-06, 07:41 AM   #23
Henson
Planesman
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 185
Downloads: 13
Uploads: 0
Default

Harpoon is not defunct, sub-launched harpoons are. There is a difference.

I am unqualified to comment on surface action group tactics.
Henson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-06, 10:21 AM   #24
XabbaRus
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 5,330
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0


Default

Whilst also a fan of the Russian sub force I also think the effectiveness of the SS-N-19 is overstated. Sure on paper it looks good but how often are these things test fired in realistic exercises.

All we have is the official Russian blurb on them which of course is going to be complementary, just like any nations blurb of its own weapons systems.

It would be folly for the US to ignore the potential threat but at the same time Kapitan, until they are tested in combat or there is some independent verifiable records of such tests I think you are being a bit overenthusiastic.

It might just be better to sneak in and send some torps from up below instead of having to rely on offboard sensors to give you a position fix which will become old quickly esp if not updated regularly.
__________________
XabbaRus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-06, 11:23 AM   #25
Kapitan
Sub Test Pilot
 
Kapitan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK + Canada
Posts: 7,130
Downloads: 77
Uploads: 7


Default

Its not uncommon to have them test most of thier missiles at least twice a year which is more than the americans acctualy do.

Kursk had tested one of her 24 SS-N-19 missiles before she was lost in spingex and wintex i would not be surprised if they are firing 3 or 4 of them in tests.
__________________
DONT FORGET if you like a post to nominate it by using the blue diamond



Find out about Museum Ships here: https://www.museumships.us/

Flickr for all my pictures: https://www.flickr.com/photos/131313936@N03/

Navy general board articles: https://www.navygeneralboard.com/author/aegis/
Kapitan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-06, 11:52 AM   #26
hyperion2206
Ace of the Deep
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Cologne, Germany
Posts: 1,227
Downloads: 8
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SeaQueen
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smaragdadler
Nice pic, showing the anechoic coating of a Type U212.
Is it just me or does that sub just look TOTALLY sci-fi?

I agree: the sail looks a bit odd but the rest looks normal to me. What makes you think that the 212 class looks sci-fi?
hyperion2206 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-06, 02:11 PM   #27
ASWnut101
Admiral
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 2,021
Downloads: 9
Uploads: 0
Default

its got a sci-fi engine. its a hydrogen powered battery, like the new experimental cars
__________________

ASWnut101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-06, 02:54 PM   #28
hyperion2206
Ace of the Deep
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Cologne, Germany
Posts: 1,227
Downloads: 8
Uploads: 0
Default

I know, but SeaQueen said that the sub LOOKED sci-fi. Since you can't see the hydrogen powered batteries...
hyperion2206 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-06, 04:17 PM   #29
ASWnut101
Admiral
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 2,021
Downloads: 9
Uploads: 0
Default

.....you can just imagine that they are there
__________________

ASWnut101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-06, 05:52 PM   #30
SeaQueen
Naval Royalty
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 1,185
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hyperion2206
I know, but SeaQueen said that the sub LOOKED sci-fi. Since you can't see the hydrogen powered batteries...
The sail, the tail and the bow array are TOTALLY STYLIN' DUDE
SeaQueen is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.