![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#16 | |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,643
Downloads: 19
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Let's Sink Sumptin' !
|
![]()
2....Ng1- f3 (previous move)
2. Nb8-c6 ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,643
Downloads: 19
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Yes! Ruy Lopez!
2...Nb8-c6 (previous move) My move: 3. Bf1-b5 Time to make me move that bishop. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Let's Sink Sumptin' !
|
![]()
Yes!
![]() 3. 3. Bf1-b5 ...your move 3. a7-a6 BTW I dislike pawn sacrifices too. More fun to husband one's forces for the climatic battles ahead. ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |
Soaring
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Almost like diamonds, and just for you! :P
__________________
If you feel nuts, consult an expert. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 | |
Let's Sink Sumptin' !
|
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
![]() ![]() --Mobilis in Mobili-- |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,643
Downloads: 19
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
That is a nice looking board.
Previous move: 3...a7-a6 My move: 4. Bb5-a4 This line is indeed the Morphy. It also is my favorite line. Seems like you know your theory, which means that this is going to get really interesting. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
Ace of the Deep
![]() Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,098
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
We've an interesting mix of nationally named openings going on here: The English opening in match 1, the Spanish in this game (as the Ruy is also known), and the French defence in the third game. Seems all the major 17th century colonial powerhouses are accounted for
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 | |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,643
Downloads: 19
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 | |
Soaring
|
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
If you feel nuts, consult an expert. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 | ||
Ace of the Deep
![]() Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,098
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
Let's Sink Sumptin' !
|
![]()
Dang...you guys know your openings, national histories and all.
Okay...lemme try a developing move which buys a little time by putting pressure on White's King Pawn. This should bring the crowds back from the beer stands. 4. Bb5-a4.....your move. 4. Ng8-f6 By the way I come from the old school move recording method of P-K4, N-KB3...etc. So, should any of my algebraic notation cease to make sense just refer to the picture. ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
Samurai Navy
![]() Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: below North Sea level (iow Holland)
Posts: 592
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
C'mon you guys. It took you 2 days to get to this point in the game ? After all it's only the beaten path you took
![]() [i am serious btw ![]()
__________________
\"Navigare necesse est, vivere non est necesse\" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
Soaring
|
![]()
Yes, let the mushrooms raise all over the board!
![]() BTW, torplexed, what kind of notation is that you mentioned? P-K4? Pawn to King 4...? ![]()
__________________
If you feel nuts, consult an expert. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 | |
Ace of the Deep
![]() Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,098
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
It still persists though, even today, as a lot of the classics that are reprinted are done so without any conversion from descriptive to algebraic. My personal favourite of these is my copy of Staunton's "The Chess-Player's Handbook" (originally published in 1847, my copy is a reprint from 1994); try and follow this typical quotation from it: 1. P to K's 4th 1.P to K's 4th. 2. K's Kt. to B's 3rd. 2. Q. to K. B's 3rd 3. K's B to Q.B's 4th. 3. Q to K. Kt's 3rd "Black now attacks two undefended Pawns, but he can take neither without ruinous loss to him; for suppose on your playing P to Q's 3rd, to protect the K's P., he ventures to take the K Kt.'s P., you immediately take the K.B's P. with your B (ch)..." Its notation is much more cumbersome than the more common abbreviated form of descriptive in other books (ex P-K4 instead of P to K's 4th), but I bought the book anyway as a curiousity piece ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|