![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#16 |
Admiral
![]() Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bay Area, California, USA
Posts: 2,377
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
nvm
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Admiral
![]() Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bay Area, California, USA
Posts: 2,377
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
So in theory, going from 60hz to 75hz means that I will now gain 25% more fps than previously? Is this a correct assumption?
__________________
It takes two to tango ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | ||
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,668
Downloads: 4
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Admiral
![]() Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bay Area, California, USA
Posts: 2,377
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
That's true, the upgrade is minimal... But I do notice that the wires on my u-boat are drawn in more consistently now, meaning less of that pixelated look.
Thanks Gizzmoe. Maybe for Christmas I should ask Santa for a 160hz monitor.. :hmm:
__________________
It takes two to tango ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,668
Downloads: 4
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
Admiral
![]() Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bay Area, California, USA
Posts: 2,377
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Well, currently I only play SH3, and before that it was IL2FB, and before that it was CFS2... I'd call myself less of a gamer and more of a flightsim/subsim junkie.
So as long as SH3 can hit 120fps, I might want to capitalize with a better monitor...
__________________
It takes two to tango ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 | |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,668
Downloads: 4
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
I play most of my games at 1280x960@100 or 1400x1050@85, it´s a 21" CRT with 110khz. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|