SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Silent Hunter 3 - 4 - 5 > SHIII Mods Workshop
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-02-05, 12:27 AM   #16
Beery
Admiral
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Silver Spring, MD, USA (but still a Yorkshireman at heart - tha can allus tell a Yorkshireman...)
Posts: 2,497
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BladeHeart
Would not the Sanchal's new model installer do the trick?
I sure hope so. The first things I'll be looking for are new 3D crew models and reflections for the boats that are currently missing them. These are both essential in my view, but the problem is that it's very tempting for folks to get caught up in adding new ship models and other 'chrome' rather than getting these annoying issues sorted out. These things get left out because they're not all that exciting to work on, but these little details are the things that make potential new players regard the game as poorly finished and perhaps less worthy of their time than other similarly-priced games. Chrome can only lengthen a game's appeal when players are becoming bored, but unsolved bugs and errors can kill a game in the minds of those who might be willing to try it. As these things continue to go unresolved, the fewer new players the game gets, and the less likely it becomes that the simulation genre will come back to popularity. I believe it's very important always to fix bugs first so that new players are drawn in, then do the chrome later. In my view, doing it the other way around tends to shorten the lifespan of a game, and to delay the resurrection of the simulation genre.

In the late 1990s it took just a couple of big sim releases that got the reputation of being very bug-ridden (Falcon and Red Baron 2) to all-but destroy the simulation genre - a genre that was preeminent until that time. These days, with simulations being very much weaker as a genre, even a minor issue with a single game can cause serious long-term problems for the genre as a whole. I believe game companies are looking at SH3 and seeing whether it's worth putting money into simulations again. The more we can do to make SH3 attractive to new players, the more likely we are to see high quality simulations make a comeback.
__________________
"More mysterious. Yeah.
I'll just try to think, 'Where the hell's the whiskey?'"
- Bob Harris, Lost in Translation.

"Anyrooad up, ah'll si thi"
- Missen.
Beery is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-05, 04:29 AM   #17
CWorth
Grey Wolf
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Gettysburg PA
Posts: 845
Downloads: 38
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beery
I sure hope so. The first things I'll be looking for are new 3D crew models and reflections for the boats that are currently missing them. These are both essential in my view, but the problem is that it's very tempting for folks to get caught up in adding new ship models and other 'chrome' rather than getting these annoying issues sorted out.
This is also what I would look to do first.Get the existing problems fixed that can be fixed with this tool and then worry about new ships etc.As for t he uniforms I can live with them until they do or even if they cant get new models for them.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beery
These things get left out because they're not all that exciting to work on, but these little details are the things that make potential new players regard the game as poorly finished and perhaps less worthy of their time than other similarly-priced games. Chrome can only lengthen a game's appeal when players are becoming bored, but unsolved bugs and errors can kill a game in the minds of those who might be willing to try it. As these things continue to go unresolved, the fewer new players the game gets, and the less likely it becomes that the simulation genre will come back to popularity. I believe it's very important always to fix bugs first so that new players are drawn in, then do the chrome later. In my view, doing it the other way around tends to shorten the lifespan of a game, and to delay the resurrection of the simulation genre.

In the late 1990s it took just a couple of big sim releases that got the reputation of being very bug-ridden (Falcon and Red Baron 2) to all-but destroy the simulation genre - a genre that was preeminent until that time. These days, with simulations being very much weaker as a genre, even a minor issue with a single game can cause serious long-term problems for the genre as a whole. I believe game companies are looking at SH3 and seeing whether it's worth putting money into simulations again. The more we can do to make SH3 attractive to new players, the more likely we are to see high quality simulations make a comeback.
One can only hope that the simulation genre will become fruitful again.It has been a long time since I have seen a really good..true simulation come out.But with the pattern emerging of game developers releasing unfinished games to the public or releasing a sim that is missing features that should be there because it was an important part of the particular time period the sim is covering makes it harder for the buyers to want to continue purchasing them.Hopefully this trend will turn around and we will see the return of the simulation genre return to prominence.
CWorth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-05, 06:56 AM   #18
martes86
Grey Wolf
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: The Colourful Seville - Spain
Posts: 971
Downloads: 18
Uploads: 0
Default

The crew models haven't been found yet? It's somewhat an interesting thing. I would put things in this order:

- Fix the interiors.
- Fix the looking of the crew.
- Make new ships (but this one is already in the first place, sooo)
- Make new harbour models.
- Fix the looking of the DDs crews.
- Make other countries' subs (the first would be the american/japanese ones)

martes86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-05, 08:45 AM   #19
BladeHeart
Chief
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 320
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Have played a session with this mod.
It is good but I think I have got use to my Pascal's uniforms, so it did not feel right.

Think I might merge the 2, using the insignia file from one with the uniforms, of the other, etc. :hmm:

Will certainly consider any future work in this series, please keep at it.

BladeHeart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-05, 03:26 PM   #20
Totenkopf
Loader
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 85
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Sorry I haven't posted in a bit, got me the 1:72 model of the VIIC. Beautiful model but a bit disproportioned. Conning tower is too small for the keel but otherwise she is a beauty! I have chosen the "Red Devil" U-552 as my end product with a bit of a tweak to make her look like the SH3 VIIB. I will post pics when I get her done.

Thanks for the feedback lads, and the encouragement. I just did a fixup on the textures and released it as Sub_Crew2, I think you will be pleased.

I agree on the Pascal skins. I was going to upgrade them to sharper imaging but that is a bit harder than doctoring up the stock ones. Plus I didn't want to tread on his toes, he works hard. I tried to emboss the emblem on the tunic, in this new release, but I believe it is a modeling tweak. Hopefully with San's new importer we can fix this and more on the meshes.
Totenkopf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-05, 03:28 PM   #21
Marhkimov
Admiral
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bay Area, California, USA
Posts: 2,377
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

I love your sub crew. The clothing texture is very nice... Good going!
__________________
It takes two to tango
Marhkimov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-05, 03:33 PM   #22
Totenkopf
Loader
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 85
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Oh, a few things. *cheers for Beery*!!! Well said! I hope Ubi is listening.

As to the installation of the mod, it is only textures and will write ofer only the textures in each sub-folder so use installer or manual it does the same thing.

Pics coming very soon..... I think
Totenkopf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-05, 04:05 PM   #23
Kpt. Lehmann
GWX Project Director
 
Kpt. Lehmann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: The Republic of Texas
Posts: 6,992
Downloads: 124
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by martes86
The crew models haven't been found yet? It's somewhat an interesting thing. I would put things in this order:

- Fix the interiors.
- Fix the looking of the crew.
- Make new ships (but this one is already in the first place, sooo)
- Make new harbour models.
- Fix the looking of the DDs crews.
- Make other countries' subs (the first would be the american/japanese ones)

Surely you guys have noticed too how when the light changes, the crew's hands get dark quicker than their faces... as if there were a drastic difference in lighting of the hands vs. the face.

I HATE that... one of my few remaining pet peeves about SH3.

Pascal has largely fixed the problem and has a really great crew mod, however the insignia on the crews chests are too blurry to see the swastika/ HakenKreuz.

(not a political statement, but if it was there during the war... I want to see it on my PC... visual realism is just as important to me as content realism, if not MORE-SO.)
__________________

www.thegreywolves.com
All you need is good men. - Heinrich Lehmann-Willenbrock
Kpt. Lehmann is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-05, 06:23 AM   #24
Totenkopf
Loader
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 85
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Ok, finaly got some comparison pics for you lot.


Here is a before and after of the First Officer.


Hands closeup, I intend to do more work on this.


The new and improved Cap.


Here is the white cap.

So far so good.
Totenkopf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-05, 06:27 AM   #25
Totenkopf
Loader
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 85
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Bah! That didn't work out too well. Copy and paste the links I guess till I figure this out
Totenkopf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-05, 06:30 AM   #26
Totenkopf
Loader
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 85
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Test....

Totenkopf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-05, 06:44 AM   #27
rulle34
Grey Wolf
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Sweden
Posts: 835
Downloads: 8
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Totenkopf
Test....

Test failed....
__________________
rulle34 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-05, 06:50 AM   #28
Totenkopf
Loader
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 85
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Heh, yeah seems so
Totenkopf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-05, 06:51 AM   #29
Marhkimov
Admiral
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bay Area, California, USA
Posts: 2,377
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Try imageshack or photobucket... less hassle...
__________________
It takes two to tango
Marhkimov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-05, 07:04 AM   #30
OneTinSoldier
Sonar Guy
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Denver, CO USA
Posts: 382
Downloads: 46
Uploads: 0
Default

You didn't specify an image, the filename does not end with...

.jpg
.gif
.bmp

I would say thry this....




But it obviously doesn't work either.


Yahoo probably doesn't allow hotlinking. Try imageshack or photobucket as suggested by marhkimov.
__________________
"Variable this is EasyRhino, do you copy? Over." Loud and clear EasyRhino. "Do we have a gig? Over." That's a Roger, we have a gig. Target is painted, start the music. "Roger that Variable. Into attack. Pickling target. Target is acquired and lit. LGB comin' down!" EasyRhino, circular error probability zero. Impact with High Order Detonation. Thank You, have a nice day.
OneTinSoldier is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.