SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-12-14, 12:14 PM   #16
Jimbuna
Chief of the Boat
 
Jimbuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 250 metres below the surface
Posts: 190,500
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 13


Default

__________________
Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something.
Oh my God, not again!!

Jimbuna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-14, 12:38 PM   #17
Wolferz
Navy Seal
 
Wolferz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: On a mighty quest for the Stick of Truth
Posts: 5,963
Downloads: 52
Uploads: 0
Default

OMG!!!
You Basum!!!
My EYES My EYES!!!!
__________________

Tomorrow never comes
Wolferz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-14, 12:47 PM   #18
mapuc
CINC Pacific Fleet
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Denmark
Posts: 20,537
Downloads: 37
Uploads: 0


Default

Thank you for your reply, even the funny ones they gave me a good laugh.

As I said, it's best it isn't me who's going to make this decision.

Day before yesterday DoD program office sends out "Request for Binding Information"
to the four participating manufacturers
The decision will be made medio 2015 and expected arrival of first fighter plane about 2020.

Have been reading many of the comment's on the Danish homepage "Nytkampfly.dk" = new combat aircraft

Many say that the F-35 is so expensive Denmark wouldn't have enough money to have them. Advanced fighter indeed, but to expensive.



Markus
mapuc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-14, 01:25 PM   #19
kraznyi_oktjabr
Sea Lord
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Republiken Finland
Posts: 1,803
Downloads: 8
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mapuc View Post
Denmark are about to make a decision on their next generation of Fighter Jets to the Danish Airforce.

The backbone in the Danish airforce F-16 has served Denmark since the late 70s and now it's time to send this aircraft at the museum. Therefore, Denmark needs a new fighter jets to replace it.
Nothing wrong in F-16. I would have considered modern variant (F-16E/F Block 60 or later) as good (relatively) low cost alternative option. As you have already decided thats not good for you...

Quote:
Originally Posted by mapuc View Post
Boeing F/A-18F Super Hornet one or two-seat, do not know which.
This my favourite. I would buy combination of single seat F/A-18Es and two seat F/A-18Fs. Single seaters would be used for air superiority etc. missions while two seaters would handle strike missions or ofcourse you could buy all single or two seater fleet aswell. Advantage of this aircraft is that you could order F/A-18Fs with Growler wiring preinstalled as Australians did. This would allow upgrading some airframes to EA-18G Growler electronic warfare aircraft when needed/funds are available.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mapuc View Post
Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II one or two-seat do not know which.
There are three variants available of which none has two seats. These are:
F-35A Air Force CTOL variant
F-35B Marine's STOVL variant and
F-35C Navy's CATOBAR variant
Although F-35 may eventually become great fighter its simply far too expensive. What will you do with aircraft you can't afford to lose?

Quote:
Originally Posted by mapuc View Post
Saab JAS 39 Gripen E / F (Next Generation) same here
Second best option in my opinion. Affordable aircraft with reasonable performance.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mapuc View Post
Eurofighter Typhoon
Good aircraft but a bit pricy. If you decide you really need two engine aircraft then this is good option.

Quote:
Originally Posted by krashkart View Post
I highly recommend the F-35. Somebody's got to help us pay for that flying metal coprolite.
Oh the joys of corporate wellf... ehh investments to sustain industrial base!
__________________
You talk to God, you're religious. God talks to you, you're psychotic. - Dr. House
kraznyi_oktjabr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-14, 06:38 PM   #20
Wolferz
Navy Seal
 
Wolferz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: On a mighty quest for the Stick of Truth
Posts: 5,963
Downloads: 52
Uploads: 0
America's military industrial complex thanks you for your support.

Free floor mats with every unit purchased.
__________________

Tomorrow never comes
Wolferz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-14, 06:22 AM   #21
Jimbuna
Chief of the Boat
 
Jimbuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 250 metres below the surface
Posts: 190,500
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 13


Default

They buy the F35 and they'll not have anything left to purchase the fuel needed
__________________
Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something.
Oh my God, not again!!

Jimbuna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-14, 02:06 AM   #22
vanjast
Sea Lord
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Somewhere else now
Posts: 1,733
Downloads: 825
Uploads: 4
Default

funny how no one has mentioned this..

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sukhoi_PAK_FA

vanjast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-14, 02:27 AM   #23
Stealhead
Navy Seal
 
Stealhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 5,421
Downloads: 85
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Admiral Halsey View Post
.
True it may not be as fast as modern jets but how well could a heat seeking missile track them? After all its got no jet exhaust
Very easily actually a heat seeking missile sees a difference in infrared signatures anything that produces heat above the atmospheric temperatures can be seen.Modern IR can even lock onto the heat signature of the friction of airflow across the fuselage.

Heck the early AIM-9 and AIM-4 very often took down remote flown WWII stock a modern IR missile would have a much easier time.Some US drones have been killed by Taliban using MANPADS it just does not make the news and they have a lower IR signature than a P-51.

The appearance of the SA-7 in Vietnam in 1971 put a fairly rapid end to the career of the A-1.
Stealhead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-14, 10:11 AM   #24
Jimbuna
Chief of the Boat
 
Jimbuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 250 metres below the surface
Posts: 190,500
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 13


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vanjast View Post
funny how no one has mentioned this..

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sukhoi_PAK_FA

Most likely because the winning candidate will be announced mid 2015 and the Sukhoi is not expected to become operational in Russia until a year later.
__________________
Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something.
Oh my God, not again!!

Jimbuna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-14, 02:42 PM   #25
Oberon
Lucky Jack
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 25,976
Downloads: 61
Uploads: 20


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimbuna View Post
Most likely because the winning candidate will be announced mid 2015 and the Sukhoi is not expected to become operational in Russia until a year later.
That and I can't see a member of NATO buying anything Russian in the current climate...
Oberon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-14, 03:13 PM   #26
Jimbuna
Chief of the Boat
 
Jimbuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 250 metres below the surface
Posts: 190,500
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 13


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oberon View Post
That and I can't see a member of NATO buying anything Russian in the current climate...
Oh I don't know...I hear the Russians have some Ukrainian aircraft going for a bargain basement price
__________________
Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something.
Oh my God, not again!!

Jimbuna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-14, 09:49 AM   #27
Wolferz
Navy Seal
 
Wolferz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: On a mighty quest for the Stick of Truth
Posts: 5,963
Downloads: 52
Uploads: 0
I think you'd be better off spending the money on anything other than fancy military hardware.
__________________

Tomorrow never comes
Wolferz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-14, 09:55 AM   #28
nikimcbee
Fleet Admiral
 
nikimcbee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Patroling the Slot.
Posts: 17,952
Downloads: 90
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oberon View Post
That and I can't see a member of NATO buying anything Russian in the current climate...
...so I guess buying MiG-21s is out then?
__________________
nikimcbee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-14, 09:57 AM   #29
nikimcbee
Fleet Admiral
 
nikimcbee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Patroling the Slot.
Posts: 17,952
Downloads: 90
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolferz View Post
America's military industrial complex thanks you for your support.

Free floor mats with every unit purchased.

Is there a discount if we buy in bulk? Does Costco carry them?
__________________
nikimcbee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-14, 06:56 PM   #30
Wolferz
Navy Seal
 
Wolferz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: On a mighty quest for the Stick of Truth
Posts: 5,963
Downloads: 52
Uploads: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by nikimcbee View Post

Is there a discount if we buy in bulk? Does Costco carry them?
Only on the website to be delivered from the warehouse. If you wish to discuss a bulk rate purchase, call 1-800 COSTCO
__________________

Tomorrow never comes
Wolferz is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.