SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Silent Hunter 3 - 4 - 5 > Silent Hunter 4: Wolves of the Pacific
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-13-11, 07:21 PM   #16
Platapus
Fleet Admiral
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 19,365
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Prates View Post
I'm running TMO right now.

Tanks from the early war (say, 1939/1940) would carry 37mm cannons, so that is a fair compairson.
Well not really. The 40mm and 37mm rounds can only compare due to the diameter of the projectile, but not much past that.

The 40mm round (MkIIT) contained about 59 grams of explosive
The 37mm Round (M63) contained 39 grams of explosive

The 40mm round had a muzzle velocity of 868 meters per second
The 37mm round had a muzzle velocity of 785 meters per second

The 40mm projectile weighed 907 grams
The 37mm projectile weighed 331 grams

The 40mm had an armour penetration of about 25mm
The 37mm had an armour penetration of about 25mm (the M63 was not the optimum AP 37mm round) 37mm AP rounds were solid rounds with no explosive.

Any numbers about armour penetration is HIGHLY dependent on armour type, range, and angle of impact so they can only be used as a VERY approximate figure.

Sources

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/37_mm_Gun_M3#Ammunition
http://www.wwiiequipment.com/index.p...raft&Itemid=58
__________________
abusus non tollit usum - A right should NOT be withheld from people on the basis that some tend to abuse that right.
Platapus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-11, 07:34 PM   #17
Patrick_Hillary
Watch
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 20
Downloads: 43
Uploads: 0
Default Carlas Hathcock.

Gunnery Sargent Carlos Hathcock used a scope mounter .5 browing M2 in Vietnam, Peoples Republic of, to devesating effect. I believe that the 40mm and 20mm were used to supress enemy deck gun crews while the 4 inch dealt the damage. Good hunting.
Patrick_Hillary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-11, 08:00 PM   #18
Daniel Prates
Grey Wolf
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Curitiba, Brazil
Posts: 938
Downloads: 65
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Platapus View Post
Well not really. (...) Any numbers about armour penetration is HIGHLY dependent on armour type, range, and angle of impact so they can only be used as a VERY approximate figure.
Fair enough. But I only meant "roughly". It should be added that since the 40mm was intended as an anti-air gun, it's HE shells cannot compare to tank HE shells, and even less compare to tank AP shells. There are othee issues too, such as the projectile/propelant ratio, which makes all the difference since it is purpose-related. Tank ammo (AP) was intended to have an as high as possible muzzle velocity, for penetration reasons, which is not the case with the 40mm either.
Daniel Prates is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.