SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-09-10, 12:01 PM   #16
Takeda Shingen
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,643
Downloads: 19
Uploads: 0
Default

Huh. I don't buy the 'demonstrating that we can launch a SLBM' because everyone already knows that we have that capability. The ambiguity is kind of worrying; I'd say forget gold, it may be time to invest in scrap.
Takeda Shingen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-10, 12:02 PM   #17
ETR3(SS)
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Between test depth and periscope depth
Posts: 3,021
Downloads: 175
Uploads: 16
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TLAM Strike View Post
Old dude in the video was wrong though the only live (yes a live nuke) SLBM test by the US was launched from the Pacific at a target in the Indian Ocean. It was called Frigate Bird.
But he was right at the same time. Test launches of the missiles are conducted in the Atlantic, that's where all the necessary facilities are located at. Off the coast of SoCal wouldn't be a logical place for this either when we have Barking Sands.
__________________


USS Kentucky SSBN 737 (G)
Comms Div 2003-2006
Qualified 19 November 03

Yes I was really on a submarine.
ETR3(SS) is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-10, 12:07 PM   #18
TLAM Strike
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Rochester, New York
Posts: 8,633
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 6


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ETR3(SS) View Post
Off the coast of SoCal wouldn't be a logical place for this either when we have Barking Sands.
Not if they are doing a interceptor test from Barking Sands for the THAAD or some other system.
__________________


TLAM Strike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-10, 12:14 PM   #19
ETR3(SS)
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Between test depth and periscope depth
Posts: 3,021
Downloads: 175
Uploads: 16
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TLAM Strike View Post
Not if they are doing a interceptor test from Barking Sands for the THAAD or some other system.
Yeah, but if they had a test for that they would work around it not throw a dart at the map and just launch it from there. Well, you would think.
__________________


USS Kentucky SSBN 737 (G)
Comms Div 2003-2006
Qualified 19 November 03

Yes I was really on a submarine.
ETR3(SS) is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-10, 12:17 PM   #20
mookiemookie
Navy Seal
 
mookiemookie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 9,404
Downloads: 105
Uploads: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Takeda Shingen View Post
Huh. I don't buy the 'demonstrating that we can launch a SLBM' because everyone already knows that we have that capability. The ambiguity is kind of worrying; I'd say forget gold, it may be time to invest in scrap.
Or Sunset Sasparilla Star Bottle Caps.
__________________
They don’t think it be like it is, but it do.

Want more U-boat Kaleun portraits for your SH3 Commander Profiles? Download the SH3 Commander Portrait Pack here.
mookiemookie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-10, 12:21 PM   #21
The Third Man
Stowaway
 
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
Default

The Air Force launches its ICBMs toward Kwajalein Atoll in the Marshall Islands from Vandenburgh AFB. Perhaps it was a SLBM using the AF test range.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-10, 12:22 PM   #22
Rockstar
In the Brig
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Zendia Bar & Grill
Posts: 12,614
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0


Default

It caused a stir no doubt think maybe it was done to watch someones comms net light up and see who started talking to whom and from where?

Maybe Al Haig finally got to push the button he never got to during those few minutes he was in charge.
Rockstar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-10, 12:29 PM   #23
TLAM Strike
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Rochester, New York
Posts: 8,633
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 6


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ETR3(SS) View Post
Yeah, but if they had a test for that they would work around it not throw a dart at the map and just launch it from there. Well, you would think.
Maybe they wanted a test where the blue side didn't know where the OPFOR was going to launch from or when. So they launched from an unusual area to test the system's ability to handle a surprise attack.
__________________


TLAM Strike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-10, 12:47 PM   #24
Oberon
Lucky Jack
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 25,976
Downloads: 61
Uploads: 20


Default





Some of the chaps over on stratpages think that it might be a misident'd commercial contrail, but tbh, to me at least, that looked like a missile. There was no NOTAM released before the launch, and news sources seem to state that NORAD and other traditional ICBM detection services didn't pick anything up, to the extent that they're using the footage released by the news agency to try and investigate it.

All a bit confusing really. I wonder if we'll ever know...

Last edited by Oberon; 11-09-10 at 01:05 PM.
Oberon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-10, 01:30 PM   #25
TLAM Strike
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Rochester, New York
Posts: 8,633
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 6


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oberon View Post


Plays like a wishlist for the Airforce...

No mention of Trident or Tomahawk as potential solutions.
__________________


TLAM Strike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-10, 01:55 PM   #26
Molon Labe
Silent Hunter
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Along the Watchtower
Posts: 3,810
Downloads: 27
Uploads: 5
Default

With our government clueless about this, it doesn't leave many possibilities.

The only thing that's going through my head is the article posted to the front page here a few days ago telling us to "stay tuned," because the G-Dub would be in the next ROK-US ASW exercises in the Yellow Sea. I know, it's not a proportional response, but I can't think of anything else that makes any sense.
__________________
Molon Labe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-10, 02:02 PM   #27
razark
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 2,731
Downloads: 393
Uploads: 12
Default

Came across this video:
__________________
"Never ask a World War II history buff for a 'final solution' to your problem!"
razark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-10, 02:18 PM   #28
Oberon
Lucky Jack
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 25,976
Downloads: 61
Uploads: 20


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TLAM Strike View Post
Plays like a wishlist for the Airforce...

No mention of Trident or Tomahawk as potential solutions.
I think it was put out at a time when people were calling for the scaling back of SAC or something like that. Then 'The Day After' nicked parts of it

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_S...281979_film%29
Oberon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-10, 02:20 PM   #29
Gerald
SUBSIM Newsman
 
Gerald's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Close to sea
Posts: 24,254
Downloads: 553
Uploads: 0


__________________
Nothing in life is to be feard,it is only to be understood.

Marie Curie





Gerald is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-10, 02:21 PM   #30
The Third Man
Stowaway
 
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
Default

An arms limitation treaty is up for vote in the lame duck Senate. If the Administration did this to hi-lite the need for such a treaty; all I can do is wonder what isn't up to political hijinks with these folks. This is too serious a business for stunts like this.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.