SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Silent Hunter 3 - 4 - 5 > Silent Hunter III
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-28-09, 10:35 AM   #16
BulSoldier
Samurai Navy
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Burgas/Bulgaria
Posts: 550
Downloads: 40
Uploads: 0
Default

Oh how i dream of type 9 but ever since i sunk german merchant raider type 9 is just out of my reach, atleast until 42 (in witch i hope to have the fuel to go visit america )
__________________

By the hour !
BulSoldier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-09, 01:32 PM   #17
Jimbuna
Chief of the Boat
 
Jimbuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 250 metres below the surface
Posts: 190,788
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 13


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pohl View Post
Still 1 year and 6 months for it to become avilable hopefully I'll gather the renown needed for it....something near 12k and I have like 4k
Oodles of time
__________________
Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something.
Oh my God, not again!!

Jimbuna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-09, 01:57 PM   #18
Akmatov
Seaman
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Desert, USA
Posts: 38
Downloads: 59
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
i sunk German merchant raider
That is something I had never thought of. How would you know that it was a German merchant raider? They certainly would not be flying a German ensign. And if you did sink it, seems unfair that you would get spanked.
Akmatov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-09, 02:23 PM   #19
BulSoldier
Samurai Navy
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Burgas/Bulgaria
Posts: 550
Downloads: 40
Uploads: 0
Default

In dark nights, with darkened ships in hostile waters.That was in norwegian waters during norwagian invasion so i guess i should have been more careful.Few days later in the same patrol i almost did it again close to scapa flow (i know weird place for german raiders) but it was day and i said to myself, lets check the flag for extra reasurence...
__________________

By the hour !
BulSoldier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-09, 02:25 PM   #20
Graf Paper
Ace of the Deep
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Pacific Northwest United States
Posts: 1,146
Downloads: 41
Uploads: 2
Default

If you're playing with the GWX mod, I'd say you're better off saving your renown points and skipping over the VIIC completely to the VIIC/41 (with the optional 'GWX VIIC/41 playable sub' mod enabled to get all the proper stats). The VIIB is adequate for the job until 1942, anyways, but improvements in enemy ASW technology and tactics make survival a tough proposition if you don't upgrade and the VIIB is very limited in what can be retro-fitted.

The VIIC/41 has a thicker pressure hull and can dive much deeper than either the VIIB or VIIC. I think the crush depth is around 280 meters, versus the 240 of the VIIB and 260 of the VIIC, which means you can easily dive to between 240-260 meters before you risk damaging your boat. The VIIC/42 can go even deeper still.

Going as deep as possible can save your skin when those escorts are hammering away with depth charges and locked on to your exact position with ASDIC. (If only thermoclines were modeled into the game!)

Despite the GWX subs having the historically listed deeper dive stats versus the much shallower depths in stock SH3, it's somewhat annoying to have your CE babbling away about the depth long before you actually do reach critical but that's apparently hard-coded in the game.

I guess you could look at it as your CE and Hydro/Sonar man are just being nervous old ladies.

I've never been a fan of the "Seekuh" type IX series boats, preferring the more versatile size and maneuverability of the VII series. They were nicknamed "seacows" for a reason. They do tend to steer and wallow around in the water like their namesake but those big boats do have their charms such as long-range endurance and enough eels to satisfy all but the most bloodthirsty kaleuns.

I've read that a few were even spacious enough to include freezers for keeping fresh meat and other perishables on hand for those extra-long patrols of which only the IX was capable.
__________________
Still sailing the high seas, hunting convoys with those who join me.
Graf Paper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-09, 02:41 PM   #21
BulSoldier
Samurai Navy
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Burgas/Bulgaria
Posts: 550
Downloads: 40
Uploads: 0
Default

Ive always liked the late war siluete (spL?) of tyoe 9 that looks like surface ships with all of its AA guns and the allmighty 105mm
__________________

By the hour !
BulSoldier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-09, 05:10 AM   #22
Graf Paper
Ace of the Deep
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Pacific Northwest United States
Posts: 1,146
Downloads: 41
Uploads: 2
Default

Yeah, a late-war XI is an impressive sight, bristling with guns as she is.

As big as the IX/D2 was, you have to wonder why they didn't try outfitting her with a twin 88mm turret instead of the single 105mm. Then again, maybe they did try it?

It would have been a sight to see if the "U-Cruiser" had been produced, with those four big guns, paired fore and aft. There were even plans to copy Japanese designs for those impractical, but ingenious, submersible aircraft carriers.

For all we know about World War II, we've already lost so much knowledge about that world-shaping conflict which affects our lives over a half-century later and, likely, far into the future. Historians are constantly rediscovering new facts that requires rewriting some of the books.
__________________
Still sailing the high seas, hunting convoys with those who join me.
Graf Paper is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.