![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#16 | |
Fleet Admiral
![]() |
![]() Quote:
Make the change on Wikipedia then! ![]()
__________________
abusus non tollit usum - A right should NOT be withheld from people on the basis that some tend to abuse that right. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | ||
Rear Admiral
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 11,866
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
![]() -S |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Eternal Patrol
![]() |
![]()
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-18
As far as the reasons given by the Air Force, they also included better visibility (the same reason given for selecting the Seversky P-35 over the Curtiss P-36), and that the F-17's engines were new whereas the F-16's engine was tried and proven. I'm not saying they were wrong, I'm just saying they aren't always honest about it. This was a thread about people getting results by wining and dining government officials. I also implied the story might not even be true, just that it was a great story.
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.” —Rocky Russo |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|