SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-24-08, 01:34 PM   #16
August
Wayfaring Stranger
 
August's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 23,227
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by XabbaRus
It's maths as in the short from of mathematics.

Mathematics is made of up different kinds of math, eg algebra, calculus etc. If each is taught singly as it is in the US 1 year for one area then indeed it is math class, but if however like the rest of the world that I know of all are taught together then it is mathematics or maths for short.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematics I know it is wikipedia but still
It must've changed since the cave man days when i was going to school.
__________________


Flanked by life and the funeral pyre. Putting on a show for you to see.
August is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-08, 02:09 PM   #17
lesrae
Grey Wolf
 
lesrae's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Somerset, UK.
Posts: 932
Downloads: 31
Uploads: 0


Default

Nice one Kurtz :O)

It's always been maths to me too.
lesrae is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-08, 04:01 AM   #18
DAB
Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 263
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by danlisa
Quote:
Originally Posted by DAB
Quote:
Originally Posted by August
Dammit, its MATH not mathS.
Its Maths in British English
LMAO, says the man from Wales.

Seriously, in correct grammatical terms, it is MATH.

You take a math class.
I take a math class.
We take a math class.

There is no plural of math.

August is correct.
It's just another indication of correct grammar being forgotten due to incorrect repetition.

The English language is doomed. Hmm, a math based thread becoming an English lesson. That's irony.
:rotfl:

As a Cornish man, you are somewhat throwing rocks in a glasshouse there. Its Maths... and one of my favourate blogs (and just because its in my second langauge doesn't mean it can't be a favourate blog) explains why

http://separatedbyacommonlanguage.bl.../03/maths.html
__________________
...snorting / snorkelling after several years of silent running.
DAB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-08, 04:29 AM   #19
danlisa
Navy Seal
 
danlisa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Cornwall, UK
Posts: 5,499
Downloads: 45
Uploads: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DAB
:rotfl:

As a Cornish man, you are somewhat throwing rocks in a glasshouse there. Its Maths... and one of my favourate blogs (and just because its in my second langauge doesn't mean it can't be a favourate blog) explains why

http://separatedbyacommonlanguage.bl.../03/maths.html
LOL, was hoping you wouldn't notice that.

As for that Blog, yes I saw that yesterday when checking my grounds for discussion.

The blogger states:
Quote:
The castigation usually goes: "Mathematics is plural, so maths needs its -s." It's a logic based on a false (AmE) premise/(BrE often) premiss. Just because there's an -s at the end of mathematics doesn't mean it's plural.
...and.....

Quote:
Why is maths the exception here? It probably has something to do with the fact that it's a much more common word, especially since it refers to a school subject. Because it's more common, it's subject to more folk-reasoning about it and more spread of that folk-reasoning.
...and.....

Quote:
Myself, I do tend to say maths in BrE company, but only because it's so painful not to.
So, in summation, basically the blogger starts off saying the word MATHS is wrong but then justifies it's use because, as I said, it has been repeated incorrectly for so long that it has now become the norm.

Repetition does not make something right, however it does seem that it forces the English Dictionary to adopt it as a correct word.
__________________
danlisa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-08, 04:56 AM   #20
DAB
Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 263
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
Default

Oh I completely agree with you, that Math makes more sense in the pure linguistic sense. But Maths has become the accepted useage in British English.
__________________
...snorting / snorkelling after several years of silent running.
DAB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-08, 05:24 AM   #21
Letum
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: York - UK
Posts: 6,079
Downloads: 43
Uploads: 0
Default

1. £20
2. £20
3. Yes
4. 20
5. Mr. Red Clop has a new telescope
6. *Translates* Arabic governments demand what for
journalists?!?

What do I win?

Seriously tho, the standard of mathmatics in English schools is far beyond and above the 1980s
norm, althow the focus has changed.
__________________
Letum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-08, 07:20 AM   #22
XabbaRus
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 5,330
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0


Default

And if you know anything about the development of languages that is how things come about. Mistakes are made somewhere in the time past which are carried forward until the point they are the accepted and correct form.

So as the blogger has pointed out in British English mathematics has become the defact spelling and is understood for what it is regardless of what grammatical arguments there are against it. In fact I don't think there is a grammatical rule that states why it is the way it is or shouldn't be.
__________________
XabbaRus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-08, 12:17 PM   #23
LtCmdrRat
Gunner
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: My mind is My Fortress
Posts: 100
Downloads: 110
Uploads: 0
Default

post#1

P.S.
I forgot the name of the state, but according the state law: 2x2=5
__________________
A joke is a very serious thing...
sir winston churchill.

LtCmdrRat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-08, 12:39 PM   #24
Letum
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: York - UK
Posts: 6,079
Downloads: 43
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LtCmdrRat
I forgot the name of the state, but according the state law: 2x2=5
Nah, I can't belive that.

One state did try to legaly define the number of pi to a fixed number of decimals tho.

It failed after many court battles.
__________________
Letum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-08, 12:55 PM   #25
kurtz
Seasoned Skipper
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Leighton Buzzard,England
Posts: 660
Downloads: 39
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Letum
Quote:
Originally Posted by LtCmdrRat
I forgot the name of the state, but according the state law: 2x2=5
Nah, I can't belive that.

One state did try to legaly define the number of pi to a fixed number of decimals tho.

It failed after many court battles.
I think one state made it 3 as that is what the bible has it as, something like a temple was 200 cubits wide and it's circumference was 600 cubits, forgot exactly what. I'm not going to check it out as I'm going to fly my kliene Me 109 about ot take the type VII for a pleasure cruise before war starts.
__________________
War without Fire is like sausages without mustard-Henry V.

http://www.myvintagelife.co.uk/
kurtz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-08, 03:42 PM   #26
LtCmdrRat
Gunner
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: My mind is My Fortress
Posts: 100
Downloads: 110
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Letum
Quote:
Originally Posted by LtCmdrRat
I forgot the name of the state, but according the state law: 2x2=5
Nah, I can't belive that.

One state did try to legaly define the number of pi to a fixed number of decimals tho.

It failed after many court battles.
But its true. I just remember that it was XiX cenuury law around 1860-70.
may be they meant complex numbers,:hmm: ah?
__________________
A joke is a very serious thing...
sir winston churchill.

LtCmdrRat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-08, 06:29 PM   #27
MothBalls
Ace of the Deep
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,012
Downloads: 20
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by danlisa
Quote:
Originally Posted by DAB
Quote:
Originally Posted by August
Dammit, its MATH not mathS.
Its Maths in British English
LMAO, says the man from Wales.

Seriously, in correct grammatical terms, it is MATH.

You take a math class.
I take a math class.
We take a math class.

There is no plural of math.

August is correct.
It's just another indication of correct grammar being forgotten due to incorrect repetition.

The English language is doomed. Hmm, a math based thread becoming an English lesson. That's irony.

I guess in the UK the same teachers teach English and "math".

In this context, the correct term would be mathematics.
MothBalls is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-08, 09:00 PM   #28
StdDev
Legend of the Sea
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: the Great Wet North
Posts: 635
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MothBalls

I guess in the UK the same teachers teach English and "math".

In this context, the correct term would be mathematics.
Maybe they teach "Englishes" !!!
StdDev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-08, 09:03 PM   #29
August
Wayfaring Stranger
 
August's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 23,227
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by StdDev
Quote:
Originally Posted by MothBalls

I guess in the UK the same teachers teach English and "math".

In this context, the correct term would be mathematics.
Maybe they teach "Englishes" !!!
:rotfl:
__________________


Flanked by life and the funeral pyre. Putting on a show for you to see.
August is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-08, 09:42 PM   #30
Stealth Hunter
Silent Hunter
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Y'ha-Nthlei
Posts: 4,262
Downloads: 19
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LtCmdrRat
2x2=5
Stealth Hunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.