|
|
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997
|
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
03-08-08, 03:03 PM
|
#16 |
|
Lucky Jack
 Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Down Town UK
Posts: 27,695
Downloads: 89
Uploads: 48
|
Can I change these for some eels please.
__________________
Dr Who rest in peace 1963-2017.  To borrow Davros saying...I NAME YOU CHIBNALL THE DESTROYER OF DR WHO YOU KILLED IT! 
|
|
|
|
03-08-08, 05:43 PM
|
#17 |
|
Chief of the Boat
 Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 250 metres below the surface
Posts: 190,844
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 13
|
These bring back memories
 
__________________
Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something.
Oh my God, not again!!  |
|
|
|
|
03-10-08, 03:10 AM
|
#18 |
|
中国水兵
 Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Germany-Bayreuth
Posts: 276
Downloads: 6
Uploads: 0
|
back to topic:
Removing the renown system comnpletely is not good imho... there is this little bug or whatever where you can get as many torps of any type you want... now imagine a type VIIc loaded fully with T-Vs .... I would say go down with the cost for some upgrades etc... but real high for the "not so common" ones... Or maybe restrict Torps by number? Well after all it is the Players choice I would say...
__________________
SH3 Commander GWX 2.0 OLC GUI |
|
|
|
|
03-10-08, 03:28 AM
|
#19 |
|
Chief of the Boat
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 250 metres below the surface
Posts: 190,844
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 13
|
Individual choice of the player I suppose....spme prefer realism, spme not
__________________
Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something.
Oh my God, not again!! |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
