![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#16 |
Stowaway
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
|
![]()
I guess we can expect the Europeans to start asking for help via NATO from the US soon. What comes around goes around. If it were up to me I'd tell the EU to pound sand and take care of themselves. Russia has an energy strangle hold on much of 'western' Europe. Islam from within and Russian oil and military superiority from the east. How do I put this..........bend over and grab your ankles.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
The Old Man
![]() Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,509
Downloads: 4
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
So the Russians are training young pilots, the end is near!!!
All a load of B.S. The Russians have every right to do operations like this. On the other hand, if they come into Aussie airspace i'll personally knock em out of the air with my laser guided boomerang.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Wayfaring Stranger
|
![]()
It's all fun and games until someone gets hurt.
__________________
![]() Flanked by life and the funeral pyre. Putting on a show for you to see. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Stowaway
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
|
![]()
[quote=Reaves]So the Russians are training young pilots, the end is near!!!
[quote] Its not like Guam is close to Russian airspace and this was a training mission. Remember KAL 007. Guam is a well known military installation and it wasn't approached by accident. It was a message. The Russians have made a calculated decision based on world opinion, military rediness, and political expedience visa vis the anti-war movement. If nothing else it shows the danger of being seen as lacking the political will for victory. |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | ||
The Old Man
![]() Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: USA, Massachusetts
Posts: 1,477
Downloads: 18
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
But no, then we have the cold war, we have the Russians supplying the enemies of America with weapons in just about every American war after WWII, we have constant skirmishes and close calls that almost destroy the world and it just continues... The Russian government has kept their country so backwards and for so long, it is just amazing. Anyway, I view the Russians as an enemy. How can I not? I have a large hatred for all that they have done and all they continue to do.
__________________
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 | |
The Old Man
![]() Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,509
Downloads: 4
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I agree they were sending a message, but I hardly think it deserves a return of cold war thinking. Russia isn't about to attack the USA, they are just banging their chests and making some noise so the rest of the world know they are there. Plus i'm sure they are not the only counry in the world that sends military units to the boarders of other sovereign countries. I find it a bit ridiculous the negative spin the paper put on the story is all.
ie: It finishes with this... Quote:
It is worrying the amount of noise they have been making lately, claiming territory in the Arctic and all. But this story is nothing to be alarmed at.
__________________
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 | |
Stowaway
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
|
![]() Quote:
I wish folks would just wake and see threats for what they are. Not that I think Russia is a threat to the US until a Democrat reaches the white house but Russia is a threat to any non-nuclear nation. Our congress is currently filled with surrender monkeys who won't lift a finger for any nation. They are in favor of talking about it however. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#23 | ||
The Old Man
![]() Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,509
Downloads: 4
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
If Russia threatened another country then I certainly would be alarmed. More of the fact that IMO the UN should come down hard on Russia for such an act but I know they would do nothing. Which is unfortunate for the USA as you guys are the only other authority that could penalize her. What ever happened to my glorious Commonwealth? (But that's a matter for another thread.)
__________________
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 | |||
Stowaway
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
|
![]() Quote:
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#25 | |
The Old Man
![]() Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,509
Downloads: 4
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: May 2005
Location: Under a thermal layer in chilly Olde England
Posts: 1,842
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I think they should change the five permanent members of the UN Security Council, just for a laugh.
Here is my suggested new five: Luxembourg, Wales, Mexico, Nepal, and The Galapagos Islands. ![]()
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
Soaring
|
![]()
Don't understand the noise. What are the russians doing, that in any way is not being done by western and american forces as well? Spy planes are operating at minimal distances to Russian airspace, for example, and a network or ELINT capable bases has been erected around Russia in recent years.
Not even starting to think about contemporary russian and american sub operations. ![]() "We had been distracted until lately, and now we are back." In combination with the approach on Scotland recently, this is the message they tell - not more, not less.
__________________
If you feel nuts, consult an expert. Last edited by Skybird; 08-10-07 at 06:02 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 | |
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Germany
Posts: 936
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
Ok, incompetence in military affairs seems to be a trademark of today's journalism. The Tu-95 is less capable of launching missiles of any sort than the average western P-3 Orion patrol aircraft. The long range comes from using the bomb bay for fuel tanks. The only weapons of the Bear D are the tail cannons, with which they maybe can launch nuclear 23mm bullets ![]() The Tu-95 "Bear D" is simply a reconaissance aircraft BASED on a bomber, not a bomber. The bomber version is called Tu-142, if i'm correct, as is the ASW version. They look similar but western interceptors would certainly notice the difference. Also the bombers do not have the range of the recon version. Of course having a recon aircraft based on a bomber does play in the hands of spin doctors. But I'm sure with the economic recovery and all that the russians might soon get a new MPA type, and I can only advise them NOT to base it on a bomber this time ![]() Maybe the Beriev Be-200 amphibian?
__________________
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
Soaring
|
![]()
The Tu-95 originally was known as Tu-20.
The general design was/is capable to carry nuclear weapons, and missiles. Variants according to Wikipedia: Tu-95/1 - Prototype.
__________________
If you feel nuts, consult an expert. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
Ocean Warrior
![]() Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Connecticut, USA.
Posts: 2,794
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
No big deal. It provides good training to radar and air crews. Tons of fun. Just make sure the planes are loaded.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|