SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Silent Hunter 3 - 4 - 5 > Silent Hunter III
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-19-07, 06:31 PM   #1
IrischKapitan
Ensign
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Waiting for convoys of the coast of Donegal
Posts: 227
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CCIP

Likewise, building the XXIs in sections as they were was a lot more efficient than the VIIs. For all we know, it was perhaps more efficient than upgrading the older fleet.

Yes the XXI was built in sections, but most of them by slave labour. Therefore they were badly manufactured, ill-fitting and when they got to port they were often missing equipment, which added to the lenght of time for them to become operational.

But If they had being avaible in '41 and in suffficent numbers, britian would not have lasted........ Dont get me wrong the tecnology was there, you only have to look at the jappeneese No. 71 sub (nearly always overlooked by historians).



But i think the blame lay with Hitler, he was always sceptical of his U-boat arm
which left donitz to make the best of a bad situation..................
IrischKapitan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-07, 06:31 AM   #2
MENTAT
Sparky
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mediterranean
Posts: 156
Downloads: 220
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IrischKapitan
Yes the XXI was built in sections, but most of them by slave labour. Therefore they were badly manufactured, ill-fitting and when they got to port they were often missing equipment, which added to the lenght of time for them to become operational.
So did VII's nad IX's. and Panthers and Tigers. You didnt think all war machines were produced solely by germans do you? and all subs were produced in sections.

Oh by the way, failure in production often resulted death penalty to slave workers and dont you underestimate the work of a labor threatened by his life.

For the topic,

Yes XXI was a revolution, and it was a way too late revolution. Just like Me262, V2 and HX homing bombs. Could have they changed the course of the war? Definitely.

For upgrading existing boats, it was a no go. Why? Because XXI was a completely new design, truly a new concept. The boat was designed and given better stats for "underwater" performance raher than previous designs which were usually surfaced and temporarily submerged.. They were actually submersible ships rather than submarines.

So Aerodynamix (or should i say Aquadynamics) of XXI were all designed for submerged conditions. We are talking about the hull. And a hull of a sub is 60% of its structure. How were you going to upgrade a VII's 60%? is it feasible? No.

Besides you have to recall your existing force in atlantic to do that. And If you do, allied forces will begin to transfer vast amounts of airforces to assist land forces which were busy to search the entire atlantic for U-boats. When Hitler saw that technologically overwhelmed U-boats were hunted all over seas, he didnt put an end to atlantic operations, on the contrary he ordered Doenitz to keep sending them to keep allied airforces busy. You would have given freedom for all naval vessels as well and that would give allies to perform an amphibious operation wherever, whenever they want.

For bleeding Britain dry by U-boats, that was a true strategy, of course not to make them starve to death but for huge amounts of ammunition, weaponry and manpower supply from U.S. All of us know that how hard Britian was keeping up with the Battle of Britain, and using Britain as a steppingstone, U.S. forces have managed to deploy enough forces (over millions of people) to perform D-DAY eventually made Germany to surrender.

Now think about it, XXI was ready and entered service in late 42 or at the beginning of 43. Allied navy has recently using ASDICs in their DDs and XXI has schnorkel, anti sonar coats as well as sonar decoys, automated torpedo loading systems, most importantly, 17-18 knots submerged speed. Official max. depth is 285m. (Note that this is (225 - 247m for VIIs and they can often go beyond that) and 285 nm submerged range (Note: 80nm for VIIs) britain would be completely isolated and USA will not be able to participate effectively in Europe.

Only one XXI was performed active duty in the last days of war and even it was detected by a pack of latest technology DDs, it survived the war, as DDs were looking for a sub making 3kts, XXI got away with 9 knots in silent speed.

Let me remind that, XXI were all design templates for US and Soviet navies after the war. during cold war, All tango class, victor class, Los angles class nuclear subs are derived from its design concepts.

XXI could definitely changed the war, at least for sure with Britain and USA.
__________________
Games are never finished. They are abandoned.
MENTAT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-07, 07:56 AM   #3
GerritJ9
Sonar Guy
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 389
Downloads: 47
Uploads: 6
Default

The "O-21" entered service in early 1940, not 1936. Like the "O-19" class before it, the "O-21s" COULD use the snorkel to run the diesels while submerged- that was the whole point. When the "O-21s" arrived in Britain after the German invasion of Holland, the Royal Navy ordered the removal of the system because they considered it useless and too dangerous. (I would have told the RN to get stuffed!)
There is a photo of the "O-21" at periscope depth with periscopes and snorkel gear above the surface and clearly running the diesels, taken in early 1940 off Vlissingen during trials. Interestingly, the Dutch Navy first intended to install a prototype snorkel system in "O-8" (ex- RN "H-6") in the early 1930s and some sketches of the proposed installation have survived. The conversion was never carried out, however, most probably due to lack of funds.
__________________
Quamvis Patiens Acris

My SH3/SH4 mods: http://www.gamefront.com/files/user/GerritJ9
GerritJ9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-07, 04:17 PM   #4
Kaleun Klink
Seaman
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: la raza de Los Angeles
Posts: 42
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
Default

It seems the Wehrmacht as a whole, along with Hitler and his inner circle, emphasized the development and production of new "wonder weapons" at the expense of upgrading proven weapon systems. Witness not only the Type XXI but also the Me-262, the Ar-234, the Pzkw VIII Maus, the V-1 and V-2, etc. Some of these clearly were more successful than others, but all drained resources from the production and improvement of older -- but still effective --weapons systems.

Maybe this addiction to new weapons systems was a sign of the Nazis' desperation as the war turned against them, maybe it was a manifestation of Hitler's own psychological makeup... It's worth nothing, though, that the Wehrmacht had wagered on new technologies and tactics before the war began -- e.g., the dive bomber and Blitzkrieg -- and that bet had paid off (at least initially). Perhaps in opting for innovative new weapons systems, rather than upgrading older systems, the Wehrmacht was just staying true to form.

Discuss amongst yourselves... :hmm:
__________________
Bernaaaaaard!

Current games: UBOAT ... Victory at Sea Pacific ...

Ye olde games: SH3 + GWX3 Gold ... SH4 plain vanilla ... Steam and Iron ... Jutland ... War Plan Pacific ...

...and many board games!
Kaleun Klink is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-07, 04:22 PM   #5
Kaleun Klink
Seaman
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: la raza de Los Angeles
Posts: 42
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
Default

Hmmm... or perhaps CCIP's more technically-minded explanation is more to the point. Ah, I'm always one to go wool-gathering...




Edit: Oh happy day, from Bilge Rat to Nub! And a much better-looking avatar!
__________________
Bernaaaaaard!

Current games: UBOAT ... Victory at Sea Pacific ...

Ye olde games: SH3 + GWX3 Gold ... SH4 plain vanilla ... Steam and Iron ... Jutland ... War Plan Pacific ...

...and many board games!
Kaleun Klink is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.