![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#16 |
Captain
![]() Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: helensburgh
Posts: 525
Downloads: 2
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
doppler effect = range rate x frequency line/speed of sound
OSL(own speed along) cos rel brg x own sp TSL ( target speed along) cos atb x vt ( target speed) OSL OR TSL kts to hz osl or tsl x freq line/3000 gives hz OSL OR TSL hz to kts osl or tsl x 3000 / freq line gives kts base frequency cos atb x vt atb tsl(kts)/vt inv cos speed tsl/cos atb = kts 1959 range 110.85 x rate of change of range rate / bearing rate squared all these are only relevent to tracking a tonal to two decimal places on a paper plot although some can be done on the TDHS computer |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |
Commander
![]() Join Date: May 2001
Location: At sea (again)
Posts: 457
Downloads: 43
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
For 59's just use the +10% ![]()
__________________
There is a forgotten, nay even forbidden word, which means more to me than any other. That word is England |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Planesman
![]() Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 185
Downloads: 13
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I have a lot to add here, but we americans are not allowed to, even if the math can be googled. Sorry. I will tell you that these are great tools for tracking in game.
Question: Does range rate analysis (frequency tracking using doppler) actually work properly in game? I just assumed that it was beyond the model and never tried. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
The Old Man
![]() Join Date: May 2005
Location: Czech Republic
Posts: 1,458
Downloads: 6
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
There is no doppler in the game, as far as I know.
Can you give some more info about how it should work ? As much as you dare ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |
Planesman
![]() Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 185
Downloads: 13
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
Range rate analysis gives the piece of the puzzle that is missing from bearings-only TMA. Bearing rate shows relative speed across the line of sight, and frequency rate shows relative speed in the line of sight. Since what we do is basically a vector problem, put 'em together with one in the x axis and the other in the y and you have course. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
The Old Man
![]() Join Date: May 2005
Location: Czech Republic
Posts: 1,458
Downloads: 6
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I see .. I understand you as if there is some way to determine distance from doppler alone.
To get speed 'in-line' you have to know 'no Doppler' frequency of the line you are looking at right ? If targets makes circle, it's the middle frequency. Simple. But what if the target does not make the circle ? How many NB lines are known to be fixed and their frequency is know exact enough ? If I understand it correctly, there is not so many of them as in DW (where all are fixed). Many of the lines are machinery based and these change with RPM of corresponding parts. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
Planesman
![]() Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 185
Downloads: 13
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Yeah. It's complicated, and I'm on thin ice as it is. I'm sorry.
(How the hell did I get this tagline???) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
The Old Man
![]() Join Date: May 2005
Location: Czech Republic
Posts: 1,458
Downloads: 6
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
You've got the tagline because you spoke too much :rotfl:
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
Planesman
![]() Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 185
Downloads: 13
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I'm always careful to google before I speak.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|