SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Silent Hunter 3 - 4 - 5 > Silent Hunter III
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-02-06, 10:22 AM   #16
Redwine
Sea Lord
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: San Martin de los Andes, Neuquen, , Argentina.
Posts: 1,962
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TarJak
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redwine
In my case, i dive as much as 45m 955 of the time, i change my crash dive to 45m, from stock 70m, due to the crash dive bug, to complete the crash dive in short time.
Looks like there is a workaround for the dreaded crash dive bug. You just have to make the weather calmer when you reload. See this thread: http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=101482
Many thanks TarJak... i was looking that topic, but i cant understand well, may be my limited english, any way i am not user of any of those two programs.

An in another hand, that not solve the crash dive problem, it happens some times inmediatelly after an incomplete crash dive, not after reload a mission.

Many thanks for help.
Redwine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-06, 07:18 PM   #17
TarJak
Fleet Admiral
 
TarJak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,052
Downloads: 150
Uploads: 8


Default

There was some discussion somewhere that you should not interrupt a crash dive or save while in the middle of a crash dive either.

Sorry this wasn't able to help.
TarJak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-06, 10:32 PM   #18
Redwine
Sea Lord
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: San Martin de los Andes, Neuquen, , Argentina.
Posts: 1,962
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TarJak
There was some discussion somewhere that you should not interrupt a crash dive or save while in the middle of a crash dive either.

Sorry this wasn't able to help.
Dont worry, many thanks for your help, up to what i know, this bug have no solution yet.
Redwine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-06, 10:37 PM   #19
_Seth_
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: In Tromsoe, @Tirpitz' final resting place..
Posts: 3,277
Downloads: 94
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mookiemookie
IIA = 152
IID = 157
VIIB = 225
VIIC = 247
VIIC/41 = 247
VIIC/42 = 247
IXB = 216
IXC = 232
IXC/40 = 232
IXD2 = 235
XXI = 285

taken from: http://www.communitymanuals.com/shii...tle=Submarines
As it says on that page: "Source: SH3 Manual and for Max Depth SH3 Crush Depth Tool. IXC/40 VIIC/41 and VIIC/42 Found Experimentally."
Im currently on my way to the surface in a IXB after reaching a depth of 289 meters.Heavy flooding, DC hammering all over, hull integrity went down to 88 % before i started surface. Blew all the air into the tanks, full speed ahed at 3 knots. I'll guess there will be a welcome-party topside, so wish me luck....

Edit: Im dead. At 263 meters the hull gave in. Now im sleepin' with the fishes...
__________________



Last edited by _Seth_; 12-03-06 at 07:54 PM.
_Seth_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-06, 11:32 PM   #20
stabiz
Silent Hunter
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Norway
Posts: 4,224
Downloads: 14
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by _Seth_
Im currently on my way to the surface in a IXB after reaching a depth of 289 meters.Heavy flooding, DC hammering all over, hull integrity went down to 88 % before i started surface. Blew all the sit into the tanks, full speed ahed at 3 knots. I'll guess there will be a welcome-party topside, so wish me luck....
Good luck!

Quote:
Edit: Im dead. At 263 meters the hull gave in. Now im sleepin' with the fishes...
:rotfl:
__________________
stabiz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-06, 12:11 AM   #21
_Seth_
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: In Tromsoe, @Tirpitz' final resting place..
Posts: 3,277
Downloads: 94
Uploads: 0


Default

Stupid Depth-charges....... stupid, stupid,stupid depthcharges...
:rotfl::rotfl:
__________________


_Seth_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-06, 04:49 AM   #22
Jimbuna
Chief of the Boat
 
Jimbuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 250 metres below the surface
Posts: 190,500
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 13


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by _Seth_
Quote:
Originally Posted by mookiemookie
IIA = 152
IID = 157
VIIB = 225
VIIC = 247
VIIC/41 = 247
VIIC/42 = 247
IXB = 216
IXC = 232
IXC/40 = 232
IXD2 = 235
XXI = 285

taken from: http://www.communitymanuals.com/shii...tle=Submarines
As it says on that page: "Source: SH3 Manual and for Max Depth SH3 Crush Depth Tool. IXC/40 VIIC/41 and VIIC/42 Found Experimentally."
Im currently on my way to the surface in a IXB after reaching a depth of 289 meters.Heavy flooding, DC hammering all over, hull integrity went down to 88 % before i started surface. Blew all the sit into the tanks, full speed ahed at 3 knots. I'll guess there will be a welcome-party topside, so wish me luck....

Edit: Im dead. At 263 meters the hull gave in. Now im sleepin' with the fishes...
Must be nice to know what your hull integrity is!!
__________________
Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something.
Oh my God, not again!!

Jimbuna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-06, 04:49 AM   #23
Mauser KAR98K
Bosun
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 68
Downloads: 25
Uploads: 0
Default

I went down to 180 meters yesterday. Had to do it to shake a DD off in the rough waters. Worked real well. Couse my CE called out"...we're approaching Crush Depth sir..."

Since that was the furthest I have dived before, I took his advice and leveled the boat out. I was under the layer and snuck away...hearing the wasserbombs exploded far far away.

Meet a taskeforce later down the road...current that is. Nailed a Corvette and two cargo ships before crashing diving to 140 meters. Unfortuantly this was the first time I ran into a ship with hedghogs Wonderful thing was, they went to deep. The depth charges were a different story thou. One exploded over my stern quarters, I tried to go deeper...too bad my boat couldn't do it
__________________
Mauser mit Dem Mauser.

U-51: Terrorizing the North Sea until France is concured! "The Keel Splitter!"
Mauser KAR98K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-06, 05:19 AM   #24
Corsair
Ace of the Deep
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Toulouse France
Posts: 1,140
Downloads: 51
Uploads: 0
Default

The crush depth is not a fixed value, it is assuming the sub is not damaged. I lost a type IX not long ago at 140m just because of a little damage to the forward torpedo compartment. And it went fast, didn't have the time to come back up to a safer depth.
__________________


NYGM 3.4A / Living SH3 V5.1 + SH3 Commander
Corsair is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-06, 08:01 AM   #25
Hybris
Officer
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Periscope Depth...
Posts: 237
Downloads: 40
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Subwolf
What is the true crush depth of the different SH3 U-boat types, or in other words...at which depth did you die?

According to the manuals the max depth of a VII is 225m, but I thought it could dive even deeper.
You can always go deeper... now coming back up that maybe a problem...:rotfl:
__________________
"His masters voice!"
"FASTER! FAAAASSSTTER!"

"All submariners have one universal wish regardless of nation, cause, or creed. That wish is that the boat goes up and stay up one more time then it goes down."
~Hybris 8/22/07
Hybris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-06, 03:59 PM   #26
AS
中国水兵
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 275
Downloads: 135
Uploads: 0
Default

Here´s what I know for sure from various readings (all figures refer to VIIb and c): - unlike the US Navy the German Navy calculated a security factor of 1.5 and 2.5, which means: 100m operational depth - (multiplied by 1.5: 150m maximum depth, e.g. when in danger, multipled by 2.5: 250m calculatzed cruch depth) - the (secret!) crush depth was considered to be around 250m for VIIb/c, but this was a calculted, theoretical figure - several U-Boats, the real U-96 being among them, went much deeper, e.g. U-96 was at about 280m and returned home - later in war, when commanders were more experienced, they normally went to 200m without hesitating, but they were careful not to go way deeper. - today´s scientific calculations estimate the actual cruch depth around 290 or 300m . the BIG problem about crush depth is that the hull didn´t usually just implode ("crush"), but the weak spots became more and more problematic, leading to flooding etc. So the relevant question isn´t so much about "when did the hull actually collapse", but "How ddep could they go without causing so unstoppable flooding"? - whereas SH3 is totally wroing about crush depth, GW is too optimistic, since they have 500m as a standard value. This is certainly exaggerated. I believe in the experience U-96 made and today´s calculation because they both say the same: lethal depth must have been around 300m. Cheers, AS
__________________
Whenever people agree with me I always feel I must be wrong. (Oscar Wilde)
AS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-06, 04:40 PM   #27
Tachyon
Captain
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: India
Posts: 514
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AS
Here´s what I know for sure from various readings (all figures refer to VIIb and c): - unlike the US Navy the German Navy calculated a security factor of 1.5 and 2.5, which means: 100m operational depth - (multiplied by 1.5: 150m maximum depth, e.g. when in danger, multipled by 2.5: 250m calculatzed cruch depth) - the (secret!) crush depth was considered to be around 250m for VIIb/c, but this was a calculted, theoretical figure - several U-Boats, the real U-96 being among them, went much deeper, e.g. U-96 was at about 280m and returned home - later in war, when commanders were more experienced, they normally went to 200m without hesitating, but they were careful not to go way deeper. - today´s scientific calculations estimate the actual cruch depth around 290 or 300m . the BIG problem about crush depth is that the hull didn´t usually just implode ("crush"), but the weak spots became more and more problematic, leading to flooding etc. So the relevant question isn´t so much about "when did the hull actually collapse", but "How ddep could they go without causing so unstoppable flooding"? - whereas SH3 is totally wroing about crush depth, GW is too optimistic, since they have 500m as a standard value. This is certainly exaggerated. I believe in the experience U-96 made and today´s calculation because they both say the same: lethal depth must have been around 300m. Cheers, AS
U-96 nearly buckled under all that pressure. The bolts were flying off so fast, it was like a pinball game inside the sub. Well, that's German engineering for you, you can push any vehicle to the limit, and have enough time to pray to God before the hull cracks up.
__________________
My propellor is faster than yours!!!



Tachyon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-06, 05:34 PM   #28
AS
中国水兵
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 275
Downloads: 135
Uploads: 0
Default

I don´t really undrstand what you´re getting at. The question was about actual cruch depth and I gave an answer which I´m pretty sure is quite accurate because I read a lot on the topic (this is why I just refer to the VII types, which I know most about). The fact that U-96 survived 280m implies that a Type VIIc could go that deep, not so hard to understand, is it? Cheers, AS
__________________
Whenever people agree with me I always feel I must be wrong. (Oscar Wilde)
AS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-06, 05:41 PM   #29
danlisa
Navy Seal
 
danlisa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Cornwall, UK
Posts: 5,499
Downloads: 45
Uploads: 1
Default

If I understand the posted figures and they way SH3 works, these depths are the depths that you will start loosing hull integrity with a previously undamaged boat.

With Stock you will loose hull points fairly quickly and will need to arrest the dive very quickly. IIRC with the supermods the loss is slower so you can afford to linger a little longer.
__________________
danlisa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-06, 05:44 PM   #30
bigboywooly
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Swindon, England
Posts: 10,151
Downloads: 35
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AS
GW is too optimistic, since they have 500m as a standard value. This is certainly exaggerated. I believe in the experience U-96 made and today´s calculation because they both say the same: lethal depth must have been around 300m. Cheers, AS
GW does say 500m on the cfg but that isnt the depth the game uses
Thats there so you dont know
__________________


My mediafire page http://www.mediafire.com/?11eoq19bq9r41
bigboywooly is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.