SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Silent Hunter 3 - 4 - 5 > Silent Hunter 4: Wolves of the Pacific
Forget password? Reset here

View Poll Results: Would you like to see SH5 set in the Cold-War era?
Yes, it's the next logical step for this wonderful series. 229 48.62%
Are you high? I can't bear to leave the WWII arena. 210 44.59%
I was hoping it'd be set in space! 32 6.79%
Voters: 471. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-19-07, 12:28 PM   #196
Navigator857
CTR2 Jack Frost
 
Navigator857's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Still on Bridge aboard the USS Iowa BB61
Posts: 213
Downloads: 324
Uploads: 0
Default

How bout Silent Hunter V - Combat Space Shuttles?
__________________
"Freedom is not owed, it is bestowed upon those who earn it!"

by....ME / QM3 Jack Frost, USS IOWA BB61 - Precom 1983 - 1987 / CTR2 Jack Frost - NSGA Northwest Chesapeake, VA. 1987 - 1994!
Navigator857 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-07, 01:11 PM   #197
rls669
Torpedoman
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 117
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tater
Having a cold war version that turns into a shooting war might as well be a space combat game IMO (if you're gonna do fantasy, go all the way!).
Yes, shame on all those totally unrealistic fantasy games like Longbow, Falcon, Eurofighter . . . there isn't a roll-eyes smiley big enough to express how I feel about this opinion.

Turn that position around to see how illogical it is . . . if you're going to do a historical simulation, why not go all the way and just sit back and watch everything play out exactly how it happened the first time? Doesn't get any more historical than that. Anything action the player takes, by definition, makes it less historically accurate.

Anyway . . . I think a Red-Menace-Pouring-Through-The-Fulda-Gap scenario would kick indescribable amounts of ass in any genre of simulation. Imagine the missions . . . everything from covert insertions to EW patrols to escorting convoys across the Atlantic to ASW screening for task forces . . . interdicting Soviet naval forces . . . attacking their convoys . . . <drool>

Last edited by rls669; 08-19-07 at 04:01 PM.
rls669 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-07, 09:22 PM   #198
Stealth Hunter
Silent Hunter
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Y'ha-Nthlei
Posts: 4,262
Downloads: 19
Uploads: 0
Default

Hell no. What happened to World War I (THE WAR THAT FIRST USED SUBS FOR MAJOR COMBAT OPERATIONS, FFS!!)?! One step forward and two steps back sort of going on, if you ask me.
Stealth Hunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-07, 09:58 PM   #199
The_Pharoah
Soundman
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 142
Downloads: 51
Uploads: 0
Default

well if I had a wish re the SH series, I'd definitely prefer the cold war scenario. I mean, who would want to fight in WW1? Its basically WWII with old subs, very little ASW and a/c.

However, what I've been eagerly waiting for is an update to the Destroyer Command game. Imagine captaining a Destroyer in the pacific or atlantic! That would definitely be awesome!!! eg.
- naval battles vs the Japs in Iron Bottom sound
- escort duty
- ASW duty
- AAA duty (esp against kamikaze attacks)
- land bombardment

now THAT would be awesome. If you incorporate SHIV grahics (maybe even upgrade to DX10) as well as good multiplayer support, you'd have yourself a pretty good game. Kinda reminds me of Battlefield 1942 online where we used to have pitch battles (ie. destroyer vs destoyer vs sub vs a/craft vs coastal batteries).

*drools*
The_Pharoah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-07, 10:31 PM   #200
sabot
Watch
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Third Rock from the Sun
Posts: 18
Downloads: 90
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sabot
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iron Budokan
.....you go back home, a mission well done and a slap on the back from Admiral Rickover.

Now I know what you're thinking. That in itself would be more than enough for a gut-wrenching mind-blowing experience but you would be wrong! Because now you get to take your sub and park it under the North Pole and stay there, being a hole in the water, coming up to a polyna occasionally and raising your mast so you can radio your situation and you receive heart-hammering orders to stay at your postion being a hole in the water.

I'm getting the vapors just thinking about it.
You forgot all the incoming EAM drills you could perform IOT get your spin-up times down.
Wait!!!

We could have a multiplayer game....the CPT who goes for the trigger gets banned for life.
sabot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-07, 04:13 AM   #201
The General
The Old Man
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Mountain Ash, Wales, U.K.
Posts: 1,548
Downloads: 188
Uploads: 3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Pharoah
well if I had a wish re the SH series, I'd definitely prefer the cold war scenario. I mean, who would want to fight in WW1? Its basically WWII with old subs, very little ASW and a/c.

However, what I've been eagerly waiting for is an update to the Destroyer Command game. Imagine captaining a Destroyer in the pacific or atlantic! That would definitely be awesome!!! eg.
- naval battles vs the Japs in Iron Bottom sound
- escort duty
- ASW duty
- AAA duty (esp against kamikaze attacks)
- land bombardment

now THAT would be awesome. If you incorporate SHIV grahics (maybe even upgrade to DX10) as well as good multiplayer support, you'd have yourself a pretty good game. Kinda reminds me of Battlefield 1942 online where we used to have pitch battles (ie. destroyer vs destoyer vs sub vs a/craft vs coastal batteries).

*drools*
I don't see this as a 'subsim' do you? Maybe you could start up a website called destroyersim and see how many hits you get.
__________________
***THE GENERAL***
The General is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-07, 04:23 AM   #202
goldorak
Admiral
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,320
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The General
I don't see this as a 'subsim' do you? Maybe you could start up a website called destroyersim and see how many hits you get.
Hey General did you even read the reason most people are voting for a WWII subsim ? :hmm:
They don't want more of the same, if an hypothetical SH V were ever to be made, the greatest addition would be a complete sub-destoyer environment.
There is one point where SH II was vastly superior to SH III and IV and thats in multiplayer.
Getting you to choose between destroyer and sub is great.
Remember that ww2 subs really only went against civilian ships, and you don't get a good multiplayer experience commanding a trawler :rotfl: .
A great multiplayer experience is in sub vs destroyer only because there is no sub vs sub combat during ww 2.
goldorak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-07, 11:17 AM   #203
Alan
Mate
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: England
Posts: 57
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0
Default

If we are going to play a ongoing game thats going to only get better.New subs and weapons,will harpoons,nukes,homing topeodes, be used?..Or ordinary R,O,E..BUT on the whole this sounds like a good idea...
__________________
Peace is our profession, killing is just a hobby
Alan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-07, 01:01 PM   #204
WilhelmSchulz.
The Old Man
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Virgina Beach
Posts: 1,301
Downloads: 17
Uploads: 0
Default

Id like them to progress to WWI
__________________
"Some ships are designed to sink… others require our assistance."

WilhelmSchulz. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-07, 01:22 PM   #205
Avatar
Commodore
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Way out there
Posts: 603
Downloads: 24
Uploads: 0
Default

Having a cold war subsim with a fictional war would be interesting and hopefully as fun as RSR, however 1950-1980 would be a 30 year war. You would have to choose a time period to begin the war. But that thinking is getting way ahead of what is actually going on here.
I'm for a change of pace from ww2 sims. The difference in technology from 50's to 80's would play huge in how you conduct your submarine action, kind of like how Star Trek: Enterprise is to Star Trek: Voyager.
Graphics and eye candy are second to playability and simulation.
Avatar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-07, 02:01 PM   #206
70shelby1943
Swabbie
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5
Downloads: 659
Uploads: 0
Default Cold-War Era

It Would be cool to a Nu, Sub to Fire off Rockets or Sunk Ships !!
70shelby1943 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-07, 02:18 PM   #207
don1reed
Ace of the Deep
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Valhalla: Silent Generation
Posts: 1,149
Downloads: 910
Uploads: 0
Default

Cold war era...I'd rather watch paint dry.

WW1 & WW2...folks really fought each other...many never came back...or,

real men eat quiche.
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.

~ George Orwell
don1reed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-07, 02:55 PM   #208
Sheppard
Captain of the Nautilus
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 146
Downloads: 223
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by peterloo
First, there is no engagements here. Nothing's eyes-candy. Just some recon missions or regular patrols (to prevent enemy intruders) definitely stinks and bores us to hell
You mean that you can't do convoy sinking in a 1950s Cold War Gone Hot with the 258 Soviet WHISKEYS built, sinking NATO convoys with boats which are Type XXIs on Crack
Sheppard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-07, 03:00 PM   #209
mookiemookie
Navy Seal
 
mookiemookie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 9,404
Downloads: 105
Uploads: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheppard
Quote:
Originally Posted by peterloo
First, there is no engagements here. Nothing's eyes-candy. Just some recon missions or regular patrols (to prevent enemy intruders) definitely stinks and bores us to hell
You mean that you can't do convoy sinking in a 1950s Cold War Gone Hot with the 258 Soviet WHISKEYS built, sinking NATO convoys with boats which are Type XXIs on Crack
Push a button, kill someone 10 miles away that you never see. No thanks.
__________________
They don’t think it be like it is, but it do.

Want more U-boat Kaleun portraits for your SH3 Commander Profiles? Download the SH3 Commander Portrait Pack here.
mookiemookie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-07, 04:21 PM   #210
Kromus
Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 250
Downloads: 140
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mookiemookie
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheppard
Quote:
Originally Posted by peterloo
First, there is no engagements here. Nothing's eyes-candy. Just some recon missions or regular patrols (to prevent enemy intruders) definitely stinks and bores us to hell
You mean that you can't do convoy sinking in a 1950s Cold War Gone Hot with the 258 Soviet WHISKEYS built, sinking NATO convoys with boats which are Type XXIs on Crack
Push a button, kill someone 10 miles away that you never see. No thanks.
Simple new "target camera" would solve that so you could see your target 1000 km away (optionable like in SH series external cam). It seems like all cold war haters are kinda brainded and unimaginative, because noone who is for CW era wants 100% real cold war campaing (sitting and waiting), but HYPOTHETICAL conflict with REAL subs/shis etc.
Kromus is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.