The Pentagon attack on 9/11 - Page 11

ASWnut101 · 02-05-07, 04:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nelson1985

Quote:

Originally Posted by ASWnut101

Quote:

Originally Posted by nelson1985

Quote:

Originally Posted by ASWnut101

I've noticed that through the course of this discussion/argument, that Elite_Hunter and Nelson have yet to answer the question on "Who did it?"

I've also noticed that when we are discussing, say the pentagon strike, that midway through the discussion either one of them comes and switches to the other building. (ie. me, wastegate and nelson are discussing the pentagon when elite_hunter starts up agian about the WTC). Why is this?:hmm:

as to who did it i dont know maybe it was the cia or the kgb or the world bankers or maybe it was you thats something we might nerver find out.

Why not?

maybe if we wait like 30 years when most people forget about 911 we are going to see it in a doc in the history channel

You still didn't answer it. You've done that with about all of the questions asked to you.

Tchocky · 02-05-07, 04:54 PM

I think that we're not being told the whole story, but that Al-Qaeda were responsible for the attacks....
I don't fully believe most high-level statements, anyone in the establishment long enough to become president/VP/SecDef/SecState has lost something along the way.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ASWnut101

I've noticed that through the course of this discussion/argument, that Elite_Hunter and Nelson have yet to answer the question on "Who did it?"

Oh c'mon, do you really expect anyone to know? And if they did, would they post it here first?

ASWnut101 · 02-05-07, 04:59 PM

what's there to be told? Were you in Europe or in the U.S.A. when the attacks happened? How am I not being told the "true" story when I wake up, turn on the tube, and see an airplane crash into the WTC? Why is it that OBL announced he caused the attacks the VERY SAME DAY?

nelson1985 · 02-05-07, 04:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ASWnut101

Quote:

Originally Posted by nelson1985

Quote:

Originally Posted by ASWnut101

Quote:

Originally Posted by nelson1985

Quote:

Originally Posted by ASWnut101

no, it only had one of the big towers fall on it

oh like building 5 and 6 and yet they did not fall and they was under towers 1 and 2 LOL

Look how big Building 7 was compared to 5 and 6. through simple experiments, you will find that smaller objects are harder to damage/crush than the bigger ones.

go in your back yard or near any tree, and grab a small stick or large twig, about 10 inches in length. break it in half. see how easy that was? Now, go find one about 1 inch in length. see how much more force you need to break it? same effect, though not proportional.

so what do you think made it fall fires?

As i just said, the big WTC buildings. Rubble.

you mean structural damage?

ASWnut101 · 02-05-07, 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tchocky

I think that we're not being told the whole story, but that Al-Qaeda were responsible for the attacks....
I don't fully believe most high-level statements, anyone in the establishment long enough to become president/VP/SecDef/SecState has lost something along the way.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ASWnut101

I've noticed that through the course of this discussion/argument, that Elite_Hunter and Nelson have yet to answer the question on "Who did it?"

Oh c'mon, do you really expect anyone to know? And if they did, would they post it here first?

Pretty much the whole (95%+) of American Citizens know what happened. I'm sure that the people who experienced the explosion and survived know what happened.

ASWnut101 · 02-05-07, 05:03 PM

First: Nelson, just quote off of this from now on. the other quote thing is too big.

Yes. I do mean that.

Tchocky · 02-05-07, 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ASWnut101

Pretty much the whole (95%+) of American Citizens know what happened. I'm sure that the people who experienced the explosion and survived know what happened.

Yes.......they know what they've been told. As regards the theories put forward here, if cast-iron proof of some other actors responsibility was available, then GT Forum of Subsim probably wouldn't be the spot for introduction. It would be across every headline.
It is commonly accepted, with a high level of coincidental/circumstantial evidence, that Al-Qaeda was responsible. We've also been told by our governments that that is how it all happened. I believe Al-Qaeda was responsible, but I don't know the full story.

nelson1985 · 02-05-07, 05:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ASWnut101

First: Nelson, just quote off of this from now on. the other quote thing is too big.

Yes. I do mean that.

ok from i read from are government investigation teams which are government funded

lol they say its fires but then they say its structural damage then they say no its both then they say well damn it we dont know lol and some of them dont even want to talk about building 7 hmm i wonder y

ASWnut101 · 02-05-07, 05:14 PM

so then how does this turn into a conspiracy? If the government dosen't know for sure what brought down building 7, why does that mean that they are not telling you everything?

ASWnut101 · 02-05-07, 05:17 PM

And even then, Please explain to me why our government would destroy our OWN, most valuable buildings economy wise, and launch a missile at our OWN military HQ only to go to war within a year? Those two contradict themselves.

nelson1985 · 02-05-07, 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ASWnut101

And even then, Please explain to me why our government would destroy our OWN, most valuable buildings economy wise, and launch a missile at our OWN military HQ only to go to war within a year? Those two contradict themselves.

but ill ask you this y did we go to war with iraq 911-iraq-oil

porphy · 02-05-07, 05:31 PM

Hi all

Best thread in a long time. Keep it up everyone...

Cheers Porphy

02-05-07, 05:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nelson1985

Quote:

Originally Posted by ASWnut101

And even then, Please explain to me why our government would destroy our OWN, most valuable buildings economy wise, and launch a missile at our OWN military HQ only to go to war within a year? Those two contradict themselves.

but ill ask you this y did we go to war with iraq 911-iraq-oil

I asked this earlier, but since you have been busy I'll ask again.

Are we talking about multiple US Congresses and Presidential administrations going back to 1979 or before?

nelson1985 · 02-05-07, 05:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by waste gate

Quote:

Originally Posted by nelson1985

Quote:

Originally Posted by ASWnut101

And even then, Please explain to me why our government would destroy our OWN, most valuable buildings economy wise, and launch a missile at our OWN military HQ only to go to war within a year? Those two contradict themselves.

but ill ask you this y did we go to war with iraq 911-iraq-oil

I asked this earlier, but since you have been busy I'll ask again.

Are we talking about multiple US Congresses and Presidential administrations going back to 1979 or before?

i dont understand what you mean what are you asking ?

Tchocky · 02-05-07, 05:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nelson1985

Quote:

Originally Posted by ASWnut101

And even then, Please explain to me why our government would destroy our OWN, most valuable buildings economy wise, and launch a missile at our OWN military HQ only to go to war within a year? Those two contradict themselves.

but ill ask you this y did we go to war with iraq 911-iraq-oil

This is making me cry. Please, please don't murder the English language like this. Try spelling, punctuation and the rules of sentence construction. Just once..

If they were in it for the oil, they could simply have made friends with Saddam again. << Not my belief, but food for thought.

Thought.

02-05-07, 04:59 PM	#153
ASWnut101 Admiral Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: USA Posts: 2,021 Downloads: 9 Uploads: 0	what's there to be told? Were you in Europe or in the U.S.A. when the attacks happened? How am I not being told the "true" story when I wake up, turn on the tube, and see an airplane crash into the WTC? Why is it that OBL announced he caused the attacks the VERY SAME DAY? __________________

02-05-07, 05:03 PM	#156
ASWnut101 Admiral Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: USA Posts: 2,021 Downloads: 9 Uploads: 0	First: Nelson, just quote off of this from now on. the other quote thing is too big. Yes. I do mean that. __________________

02-05-07, 05:14 PM	#159
ASWnut101 Admiral Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: USA Posts: 2,021 Downloads: 9 Uploads: 0	so then how does this turn into a conspiracy? If the government dosen't know for sure what brought down building 7, why does that mean that they are not telling you everything? __________________

02-05-07, 05:17 PM	#160
ASWnut101 Admiral Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: USA Posts: 2,021 Downloads: 9 Uploads: 0	And even then, Please explain to me why our government would destroy our OWN, most valuable buildings economy wise, and launch a missile at our OWN military HQ only to go to war within a year? Those two contradict themselves. __________________

02-05-07, 05:31 PM	#162
porphy Commodore Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Sweden Posts: 603 Downloads: 4 Uploads: 0	Hi all Best thread in a long time. Keep it up everyone... Cheers Porphy __________________ "The only remedy for madness is the innocence of facts." O. Mirbeu "A paranoid is simply someone in possession of all the facts." W. B.