So, what does this say about the gun owners debate? - Page 2

Yahoshua · 07-02-08, 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Enigma

I own firearms of the sporting variety, and I'd prefer to keep them. I don't own fireamrs designed to kill humans, however.

Would you say your hunting rifle is less deadly than an M-16 or AK-47?

Or do you have some fantasy that your rifle is "ok" because your firearm was "designed for hunting" therefore it is less likely to be stuck with the "stigma" of being a "people killer" rifle?

SUBMAN1 · 07-02-08, 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Yahoshua

Quote:

Originally Posted by Enigma

I own firearms of the sporting variety, and I'd prefer to keep them. I don't own fireamrs designed to kill humans, however.

Would you say your hunting rifle is less deadly than an M-16 or AK-47?

Or do you have some fantasy that your rifle is "ok" because your firearm was "designed for hunting" therefore it is less likely to be stuck with the "stigma" of being a "people killer" rifle?

Let me help him!

Hopefully i am not taking the wind out of your sails - but a hunting rifle is MUCH more deadly than an M-16 or AK-47.

-S

Yahoshua · 07-02-08, 10:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SUBMAN1

Quote:

Originally Posted by Yahoshua

Quote:

Originally Posted by Enigma

I own firearms of the sporting variety, and I'd prefer to keep them. I don't own fireamrs designed to kill humans, however.

Would you say your hunting rifle is less deadly than an M-16 or AK-47?

Or do you have some fantasy that your rifle is "ok" because your firearm was "designed for hunting" therefore it is less likely to be stuck with the "stigma" of being a "people killer" rifle?

Let me help him!

Hopefully i am not taking the wind out of your sails - but a hunting rifle is MUCH more deadly than an M-16 or AK-47.

-S

A profiecient rifleman will make any of the above mentioned firearms a deadly weapon in his/her hands.

jpm1 · 07-03-08, 07:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SUBMAN1

Quote:

Originally Posted by Yahoshua

Quote:

Originally Posted by Enigma

I own firearms of the sporting variety, and I'd prefer to keep them. I don't own fireamrs designed to kill humans, however.

Would you say your hunting rifle is less deadly than an M-16 or AK-47?

Or do you have some fantasy that your rifle is "ok" because your firearm was "designed for hunting" therefore it is less likely to be stuck with the "stigma" of being a "people killer" rifle?

Let me help him!

Hopefully i am not taking the wind out of your sails - but a hunting rifle is MUCH more deadly than an M-16 or AK-47.

-S

i don't agree against one personel yes but i let you imagine how a massacre like Columbine's would be difficult to achieve with a hunting rifle