![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Fleet Admiral
![]() |
![]()
I always wondered why the Japanese did not bomb the fuel storage facilities or the repair facilities
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Wayfaring Stranger
|
![]() Quote:
Bottom line the Japanese fleet was way out on a limb. They had made a successful attack yes but that would have been worthless if they had lost the carrier group in the process.
__________________
![]() Flanked by life and the funeral pyre. Putting on a show for you to see. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]()
Wasn't the Japanese strike force running low on fuel after the attack? Sailor Steve has the right idea, the Japanese knew that if one of our subs nailed one of the tankers trailing the fleet they would have been in trouble. The fleet would have been required to slow and wait for tankers from Japan or maybe Truk to RV and replenish them leaving the fleet open for attack by anything that survived the attack.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: San Francisco, California
Posts: 1,633
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
It seems part of the general pattern of Banzai Charges when the should be playing smart defense, and retreating when they should have persevered.
__________________
U.Kdt.Hdb B. I. 28) This possibility of using the hydrophone to help in detecting surface ships should, however, be restricted to those cases where the submarine is unavoidably compelled to stay below the surface. http://www.hackworth.com/ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|