![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
View Poll Results: Do you want a more powerful editor with Silent Hunter IV? | |||
Yup. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
46 | 68.66% |
Nope. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2 | 2.99% |
I use the editor, but it's the same to me. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1 | 1.49% |
I don't use the mission editor. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
18 | 26.87% |
Voters: 67. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Ocean Warrior
![]() |
![]()
I voted no, because IMHO, keep the SHIII editor, and use more time and effort adding AI subs instead. Thats just my opinion.
![]()
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,878
Downloads: 4
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I'd rather AI subs too, but I don't think that there would be a greater chance of getting them if the dev team decided not to go with a more advanced mission editor. The AI subs would probably require more time than improving the mission editor, although I don't know that for sure.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|