SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
View Poll Results: What did you think? | |||
I like it | 27 | 42.19% | |
I hate it | 5 | 7.81% | |
Don't know | 20 | 31.25% | |
I'm too busy drinking beer | 12 | 18.75% | |
Voters: 64. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
12-15-15, 03:01 PM | #151 |
Navy Seal
|
SPOILER !!!!
|
12-15-15, 03:03 PM | #152 |
Lucky Jack
|
__________________
Dr Who rest in peace 1963-2017. To borrow Davros saying...I NAME YOU CHIBNALL THE DESTROYER OF DR WHO YOU KILLED IT! |
12-15-15, 03:06 PM | #153 |
Stowaway
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
|
The longer you guys wait to see it, the more danger you will face of being spoiled, depending on where you roam in the internet and how sensitive your colleagues and friends are.
I might see it in the cinema just to avoid that, otherwise I'd rather wait too, cinemas aren't fun anymore. Ridiculously expensive, unable to bring own drinks and snacks, buying it there forces you into debt instantly and then you have all the retards with their effing smartphones lighting up their faces all the time. I used to love going to the cinema. Now... I hate it. Correction: I hate the people, not the cinema |
12-15-15, 03:21 PM | #154 |
Ocean Warrior
|
It was bad. If you like 4/5/6 and dislike 1/2/3, don't go.
__________________
Grumpy as always. |
12-15-15, 03:28 PM | #155 |
Stowaway
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
|
Are you series?
And what are you referring to? Art of story telling, bad story/unbelievable story? Bad acting? Can you spoil me in regards of the "goofiness"? I HATE "goofy" things, so... I'd actually like a spoiler there - maybe via PM or at least hidden in a spoiler tag just to be sure. |
12-15-15, 03:51 PM | #156 |
Lucky Jack
|
|
12-15-15, 04:20 PM | #157 | |
Lucky Jack
|
Quote:
1 was bloody awful 2 was awful 3 was better than 1 and 2. 4 was stonking great and 5 was good and 6 not bad could have been better without the teddy bears. Well give us a full review after you had a think.
__________________
Dr Who rest in peace 1963-2017. To borrow Davros saying...I NAME YOU CHIBNALL THE DESTROYER OF DR WHO YOU KILLED IT! |
|
12-15-15, 04:21 PM | #158 |
Lucky Jack
|
Well, while you wait, here's a re-edited version of 1, 2, and 3 to try and remove some of the cheese:
|
12-15-15, 11:02 PM | #159 |
Fleet Admiral
|
Make sure you clean up the pee stains after that spoiler false alarm.
Don't worry Steed, I'll take care of you. I'll ring you on the phone and tell you what's going on in the movie.
__________________
|
12-16-15, 12:32 AM | #160 |
Ocean Warrior
|
Well, my view is that:
- it was youth orientated. the dark dragoon is now an emo kid, who is worse than anakin. the poor black guy has "wtf is happening" face throught the film and I could understand him. - story is bad and tried to mimic the 4th episode in many respects. - old characters were showcased. like - look this is much han solo, so wow.
__________________
Grumpy as always. |
12-16-15, 03:39 PM | #161 | |
Lucky Jack
|
Quote:
__________________
Dr Who rest in peace 1963-2017. To borrow Davros saying...I NAME YOU CHIBNALL THE DESTROYER OF DR WHO YOU KILLED IT! |
|
12-16-15, 03:44 PM | #162 |
Navy Seal
|
The squad is picking me up in 20min and off to the theater we go.
Rewiew when I come back. But I must warn you, I'm a casual fan. |
12-16-15, 03:55 PM | #163 | |
Lucky Jack
|
Quote:
Beer and pop corn.
__________________
Dr Who rest in peace 1963-2017. To borrow Davros saying...I NAME YOU CHIBNALL THE DESTROYER OF DR WHO YOU KILLED IT! |
|
12-16-15, 04:07 PM | #164 |
Fleet Admiral
|
Even here in Denmark and Sweden, the people on the street who have been interviewed by the news are "WOW-a new Star Wars movie,even-if-I-haven't-seen-it-it-is-the-best-movie"
Makes one wonder, if they are quoting one of their idol, who have said positive things about the new Star Wars. There were of course people with their feet on the ground. Markus |
12-16-15, 05:53 PM | #165 |
Silent Hunter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Figueira da Foz, Portugal
Posts: 4,490
Downloads: 109
Uploads: 0
|
A review/critic here says that the film sins for excess and not for defect and it is "(...)such fetishistic and reverential to the the original trilogy that resembles the work of a copyist monk who was fascinated by the sacred character of the text that transcribes(...)"!
Can not say, prior to see, if it is good thing or not. |
|
|