SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Silent Hunter 3 - 4 - 5 > Silent Hunter 5
Forget password? Reset here

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-22-10, 10:16 AM   #1
thyro
Commander
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: on a rock surrounded by water, that people call it UK
Posts: 473
Downloads: 31
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arclight View Post
Thyro; SH5 was perfectly playable from the start, though with a lot of missing functionality. And with the mods at this point it is perfectly enjoyable. No need to wait 3-4 years. I'd even consider that statement a slight to the work modders have already done.

Thanks Arclight, but I think you missed my point.

Half baked products I simply don't be wasting my money on them!


Not to mention other monster called DRM which the minimum is insulting for a paying customer.

Beside I'm glad you enjoy the SH5 as it is with a very long list of problems and lack of evolution. I wouldn't stand that at all, I wouldn't mind buying a bugged game (I bought so many over the years that I got used too) but half baked game? plus bugs? plus DRM? that is too much rubish on my plate.

Don't get me wrong in one thing... I'm not water down Subsim modders, in time (not days/months but years) SH5 might become a game what UBI was incompetent to achieve before the day of game release.

So actually modders deserve more appraisal than any of UBI devs. Beside who deserves being paid any future purchases of SH5 should be SUBSIM modders and not the monkeys sat at UBI.

I feel no sorry what so ever towards UBI because if this is true and UBI let SH5 to die... then UBI just scam alot of people with this half baked product even forced under DRM draconian idiocy so they deserve no respect.

Cheers
__________________
"The good news is that you’re never, ever more than 6 miles from land. The bad news is, the land is straight down!"


thyro is offline  
Old 07-22-10, 11:13 AM   #2
seaniam81
Commodore
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 624
Downloads: 87
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arclight View Post

As far as simulators go: they published IL2 and LockOn; no doubt those are simulators. It seems you're forgetting about SH3, a praised and popular game (within it's niche) also regarded as a sim.
While I agree with pretty much everything you said Arc. I'm just going to point out IL2 and LockOn were indeed published by UBI, however they were created by 1C/Maddox (IL2) and Eagle Dynamics (LockOn) and Ubi had no hand in creating either. They just slapped their name on the box out on it's way out the door to the stores.

If anything UBI should be paying attention to 1C/Maddox because they still support IL2, and didn't IL2 come out in 2001?
__________________
Ultima ratio regum. (The final argument of kings)
- Inscription on french cannons, on order of Louis XIV

seaniam81 is offline  
Old 07-22-10, 04:37 PM   #3
Topo65
Samurai Navy
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Atlántico Sur
Posts: 558
Downloads: 403
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arclight View Post
I hate to do this...
So... dont do it! (Its just a joke ) Thanks for taking your time to read my post and give me your point of view.

Maybe I should not post without a full knowledge of the language, and take the risk of using words that could be misinterpreted. But do not blame me for feeling part of this community, which I appreciate so much and try to express myself.

I just want to make clear that I really appreciate the work done by the modders. Yes, I'm a little angry with Ubisoft and the treatment given to the saga. But I respect and accept the opinions of others.
__________________
Cold Waters 1968 Campaign
LINK a lista de Youtube
My Blog: www.marenguerra.blogspot.com
Topo65 is offline  
Old 07-22-10, 10:31 AM   #4
Faamecanic
Ace of the Deep
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Off your Stb side with good solution
Posts: 1,065
Downloads: 44
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by daft View Post
Agreed. There are more guilty parties besides Ubi in this case. A self fulfilling prophecy of ever I saw one. "The subsim genre is dead". Well, it certainly has taken a big step towards that state, but the blame lies not only with Ubi or the devs...
Thats one comment I will NEVER agree with.

Thats like GM producing crap quality cars then wondering why thier sales are far below that of Ford or Toyota. Blame the car purchasers...ya thats it.

Even the reviews in PC GAMER both pre and post patch suck, which almost NEVER reviews games before and after patch (thier policy is to only review the Gold release). And PC gamer reviewed SH5 as a causal gamer would look at the game.

I do however agree that looking at the fiasco of unfinished state in a negative light and saying "Sh 5 will never be good" short changes our MODDERS here. I feel HONORED to belong to a community where FREE MODS done with the sweat off the brows of modders here can SAVE a game that had a budget and PAID staff to produce. Hence why I feel UBI will never release a SDK (willingly) because our modders will make UBI look VERY VERY bad with what they can do. However...would be nice if the SDK would somehow end up "leaked".....illegal I know..sorry UBI but by releasing crap you brought this on yourself.. (by this I mean like how the SDK ended up in modders hands for Falcon 2.0 or how a dev for BAttlezone 2 eneded up working on and patching the game 8 years latter to something GREAT after the publisher abandoned the title).

Last edited by Faamecanic; 07-22-10 at 08:50 PM.
Faamecanic is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.