Kaspersky, Russia, and the Antivirus Paradox

[Onkel Neal]

“Kaspersky Lab has never helped, nor will help, any government in the world with its cyberespionage efforts, and contrary to erroneous reports, Kaspersky Lab software does not contain any undeclared capabilities such as backdoors as that would be illegal and unethical,” the company says in an emailed statement.

Yeah, right.

So, knowing how much access the Russian dictator has in businesses inside the country, why is it surprising that someone finally woke up to the risk of having a Russian antivirus posed? If Putin was to "ask" Kaspersky to use their AV for govt. actions, you know they certainly would. Who wants to be the next Voronenkov or Magnitsky ?

After months of escalating hostility toward the Russian cybersecurity company and antivirus maker Kaspersky, including its complete banishment from US government agency computers, the New York Times reports that Russia has in fact used Kaspersky antivirus software to probe federal systems for US intelligence secrets.

“AV is pretty much the perfect bugging device on every computer it’s sold on,” says Bobby Kuzma, systems engineer at Core Security. “You’ve got this piece of software that’s in a position to see everything on your computer.”

https://www.wired.com/story/kaspersky-russia-antivirus/

[ikalugin]

Ahh, the good old witch hunt with a touch of Putin demonisation.

Yea, you get allegations about Kaspersky doing something bad, but like the other cyber stuff (remember the scandal surrounding companies that made software for voting machines?) it has not been substantiated in the end, or in some cases they were outright debunked.

p.s.

Russian dictator

Demonisation of Putin never gets old for some reason, heh.

P.p.s. if you read the article:

and the New York Times report that outlines Russia’s intrusion stops short of stating that the company colluded with Russian intelligence.

But the North Korea incident shows that antivirus companies can be compromised without any sort of backroom agreement.

You would notice that the article is not about Russian Goverment coercing Kaspersky into conducting illegal/unethical activities, but about the danger of AV software in general based on how it is a single point of failure due to its special status/rights on the system and the projection of domestic US experience:

"We know that the US government has solicited participation from technology vendors in the United States in the past, whether through official channels or more covert mechanisms such as National Security Letters," says Kuzma. "There's no reason why other foreign governments cannot compel the same type of cooperation from companies that are based in their territory."

[Catfish]

I guess it is pretty much like Mickeysoft. When the US secret services want to know something, or the industry needs new ideas or patents.. have a look at what other people do and save on their PCs or networks. Lots of backdoors for the initiated. A hegemony is not for the faint hearted, even if is a tad better than outright war. Kaspersky will help Russia, like Apple helped the US when it came to access to "well-defended" privacy.
What else do you expect when it comes to legal matters, or a nation needing certain information?

OT (sorry), regarding Russia:
I think that Putin is much more reasonable than e.g Trump, and i begin to have some respect that he still has the composure, after being blamed for everything under the sun and being treated as a pariah.
A "dictator", well.. democracy is of course a joke in Russia. There are differences between his and our ideas of how to lead a state, but we the west do not have a real democracy either.

My theory: if you look at what is happening in Russia you probably need some "tsar" to keep it all together, and get ahead of criminals and certain networks, to have a working government in such a country at all.
I do not like his managing of anyone being critical about him, it is almost as if Mrs Politovskaja was the same calibre challenging him and his power, like e.g. this sceret service agent he poisoned with radioactive stuff, or other organised resistance.
However, this is how he spreads the message not to mess with him, most probably learned in his service times, but imho it would not be necessary for him to do that. Way too much overreacting

His speeches and statements regarding the handling of the middle east, economics and about general conduct agaisnt terrorists though should be heard, and taken seriously by "the west". The time of the Soviet Union has passed, this is not a communist state anymore.
The West has screwed up bigtime after 1990. Some like the military or those communist-eater die-hards, will sure like that we have another cold war up our back. It is not only Russia that has to change.

[ikalugin]

The irony is that the bloody hands of the regime are too busy competing for power to actually, purposefully prosecute the self marginalized opposition, which is not a threat to the regime, yet made into martyrs by western observers when they fall victims to the internal regime friction.

[Rockstar]

I switched to protonmail.ch. One week later I recieve on my last remaining gmail mail account a message from Google 'we've noticed' Im not using their service anymore. thats just freakin creepy.

[vienna]

Originally Posted by ikalugin

Ahh, the good old witch hunt with a touch of Putin demonisation.

Yea, you get allegations about Kaspersky doing something bad, but like the other cyber stuff (remember the scandal surrounding companies that made software for voting machines?) it has not been substantiated in the end, or in some cases they were outright debunked.

p.s.

Demonisation of Putin never gets old for some reason, heh.

P.p.s. if you read the article:


You would notice that the article is not about Russian Goverment coercing Kaspersky into conducting illegal/unethical activities, but about the danger of AV software in general based on how it is a single point of failure due to its special status/rights on the system and the projection of domestic US experience:

Regardless, is it really in the interest of the US government, or any government, to continue using suspect technology. Yes, there is no absolutely definitive evidence to prove Russian government collusion with Kapersky, but there is an abundance of circumstantial and other evidence of collusion to make trusting the word of the Russian government and Kapersky on this matter and to make continued use of the tech an unacceptable risk. There is the additional consideration of the very strong possibility there is much more to the US side of the story than what has been made public; the US may be acting on sensitive intelligence and may be holding back what they really know so as not to compromise cointel operations. The Flynn/Russian collusion case is an example: when the story first broke, a lot of people doubted it because it seemed idiotic individuals or organizations involved in such conduct would use unsecured channels to communicate; however, once details of the matter were divulged, there was a very strong impression Flynn and other alleged participants were blindsided and surprised by the extent of the detail, leading to a deduction the participants had, indeed, been using what they thought were secure channels and didn't know US agencies had compromised those channels. The Kapersky case may be similar: the participants may have thought they covered their tracks and are now faced with the strong possibility they have been compromised by methods of which the US is not inclined to 'tip their hands'...

Consider this: a great many posts have appeared in these forums over the years by members who have decried various software that may be spying on them and their online activities, some even removing the offending software and urging others to likewise; is it any less reasonable for the US government to likewise rid itself of potentially tainted software until the producers of the products can definitively assure their products are benign? I don't know about you, but I do my own due diligence when it comes to what I use and never blindly accept the word of the producers their products are 100% safe and myself blindly use them; and I expect the same care and attention from my government when it comes to national security. Tell me you, if offered a software download of which you are unfamiliar, would just blindly go ahead and install it just based on the assurance, by the publisher, the software is benign?; I'm pretty sure you'd at least run a Google check on the software first. The recent action is akin to that: the US government has merely done their due diligence and have declined to used very questionable software...






<O>

[ikalugin]

It makes sense for state to avoid any single points of failure ( land as such any AVs), in fact there is a drive in Russia to avoid use of Microsoft products in state institutions, but it seems like bad practice to work on a smear campaign against a software developer.

[vienna]

So if the US declines to use Kapersky and cites security concerns as a reason, that's a smear campaign; but if RU declines to use MS products, its not a smear campaign against a software developer? Seems like a very big double standard, there. But then, again, the RU government does have a well-documented and long track record of being ethically challenged. Glass houses, pots & kettles, etc. ...





<O>

[ikalugin]

My point wasnt that it is wrong to refuse to use certain software for whatever potential security liabilities you may get, but about how coverage of the said refusal grew into a smear campaighn against a Russian software company, as a part of the greater witch hunt.

It almost appears that western (particularly US) mass media would post anything they could find that would demonise Russia, for example this WP publication here:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/ampht...t-white-fears/
(and it's criticism here: https://irrussianality.wordpress.com...ssian-culture/)

[Onkel Neal]

[No virus news