![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#1 |
Nub
![]() Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Having just discovered Storm Eagle Studio games, which would be the better sim. to start with: Jutland or DG 1.5?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Shark above Space Chicken
|
![]()
Can't tell you. Which do you prefer, SH3 or SH4? I have both and the look interface is the same pretty much, just different subject matter and more pre-dreadnaught types with DG1.5 (correct me if I'm wrong here).
I'm also way behind the learning curve as battles can be massive, and I've not really concentrated on either yet. Buddahaid |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Stavka
Posts: 8,211
Downloads: 13
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
It all depends on what war you're most interested in...
__________________
Current Eastern Front status: Probable Victory |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Nub
![]() Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
So in terms of capabilities, graphics quality, AI, etc. they are pretty comparable.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Shark above Space Chicken
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Loader
![]() Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 81
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I think Jutland probably has more ships, more battles, more scenarios and maybe more complex compaing. Unfortunately I don't like much anything but Russo-Japanese War - so as for me - I only play DG
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Storm Eagle Studios
![]() Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Wakefield, LA
Posts: 284
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Jutland and DG 1.5 are both pretty similar in terms of general mechanics, interface, look and feel, etc. It's mostly a question of subject matter, the differences technology and tactics, and the sheer size and complexity of the fleets and campaigns.
__________________
-Bullethead Storm Eagle Studios In wine there is wisdom, in beer there is strength, in water there are bacteria |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
XO
![]() Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 434
Downloads: 25
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
So you might be able to say Jutland is to Distant Guns what Battlefront's CM Barbarossa to Berlin is to CM Afrika Corps, mh?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Storm Eagle Studios
![]() Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Wakefield, LA
Posts: 284
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
More or less. I left Battlefront before CMAK came out, but I was there for CMBO and CMB2B, so I'd compare things that way. CMB2B kept the same basic game mechanics but with numerous improvements and additions on top. B2B also involved larger forces, or at least could, depending on the scenario. So in that light, B2B : Jutland as BO : DG. But OTOH, B2B had a bunch of 1941-43 stuff whereas BO was all 1944-45. Jutland has a fair amount of RJW-vintage stuff in it, but also all tech advancements that happened between 1905 and 1916.
__________________
-Bullethead Storm Eagle Studios In wine there is wisdom, in beer there is strength, in water there are bacteria |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|