How to be a good Democrat

[Enigma]

22. You have to believe that there is no such thing as personal responsibility.

23. You don't believe in personnal accountability (unless it's the fault of a conservative.)

A nice addition of rot to an already rot filled list. :rotfl:

Ya'll are so funny....

[Enigma]

Quote:
For being such an "Independant" kinda guy, you sure do like to shill for Democrats. You can call yourself anything you'd like.

Way to completely avoid the question.

Between Dems and Repubs these days, it's a no brainer for me. Doesn't mean I love the Dems, (and I'd love to see where I spend so much time talking up democratic party memebers) just means I think the Repubs are wrong on just about every issue I care about.

Interesting, though. Kind of answers my question. You guys do live in black and white world. There are no good dems. Only good Repubs. Hmm. Imagine that....

Tick tick. Tick tick.

[Neptunus Rex]

Originally Posted by Enigma

A nice addition of rot to an already rot filled list. :rotfl:

Ya'll are so funny....

You're almost as combative as Skybird.

Originally Posted by SUBMAN1

They are both funny! I am just a little busy today to take the normal number of posts as I normally would. Been hours since I last logged on. Must leave again.

-S

Yeah, it's a shame that at the moment you can't spam the subsim forum with more anti-democrat posts.

[Enigma]

You're almost as combative as Skybird.

My apologies, no idea what that means mate.

[Sea Demon]

Originally Posted by Neptunus Rex

You're almost as combative as Skybird.

Maybe he can just resort to the SB method of putting everyone on ignore. Another typical way to avoid debate for those with left leaning/anti-Western tendencies.

Oh don't forget,

25. Money is not earned, but is confiscated by the government to be distributed equally.

26. #25 is to be called "fairness". If you disagree you may be guilty of a "hate crime" against the poor and people of color.

[Neptunus Rex]

Originally Posted by Enigma

My apologies, no idea what that means mate.

It's meant to be a compliment, of course.:rotfl:

[baggygreen]

whats this about the dems getting funds from the chinese??

I've never heard anything like that before??

[1480]

Originally Posted by baggygreen

whats this about the dems getting funds from the chinese??

I've never heard anything like that before??

Google Bill Clinton and China and campaign.

or here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1996_Un...ce_controversy

[nikimcbee]

Originally Posted by Blacklight

I dunno... Subman and Skybird are pretty neck and neck. Imagine if those two had a spam-off ?

That would be very popular in hawaii.

It must be getting close to November .

[Sea Demon]

Originally Posted by nikimcbee

That would be very popular in hawaii.

It must be getting close to November .

Oh yeah. Spam, white rice, fried shrimp, and macaroni salad.

[Sea Demon]

Originally Posted by Sailor Steve

Bad timing on the cross-posting. I was answering the one above yours.
:rotfl:

My bad Steve.

Originally Posted by Sea Demon

He couldn't handle it when I had the audacity to express the notion that the Russians are not an invincible entity that everyone is dependant on, and the West/NATO is not exactly a weakling with nothing to offer. How dare I.

Well in the light of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars it is should I say somewhat unexpected to have someone wave Nato's flag as if forgetting the huge debacles that those two wars are.

Oh, and did I mention the War on terrorism, the one that Russia is supposed to be an integral part of according to republicans as well, I wonder how that thing is progressing...

[Sea Demon]

Originally Posted by OneToughHerring

Well in the light of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars it is should I say somewhat unexpected to have someone wave Nato's flag as if forgetting the huge debacles that those two wars are.

Oh, and did I mention the War on terrorism, the one that Russia is supposed to be an integral part of according to republicans as well, I wonder how that thing is progressing...

They're going well enough that the Democrats in question can't even talk about them for campaign purposes. We're on the way to handing back control of Anbar province, Baghdad, and the Sadr militia is in ruins. Iraq is now a fully functioning government on they way to getting full control. The fighting continues in Afghanistan, but there is no tragedy going on there, nor does loss seem imminent.

You're still playing the "Iraq is a lost cause" routine I see. Were you just awakened from a 2 year coma?

Originally Posted by Sea Demon

They're going well enough that the Democrats in question can't even talk about them for campaign purposes. We're on the way to handing back control of Anbar province, Baghdad, and the Sadr militia is in ruins. Iraq is now a fully functioning government on they way to getting full control. The fighting continues in Afghanistan, but there is no tragedy going on there, nor does loss seem imminent.

You're still playing the "Iraq is a lost cause" routine I see. Were you just awakened from a 2 year coma?

Sadr militia is in ruins? Oh I don't know about that, it was the US who put the Shia in control in Iraq, you really think they are in ruins?

So are you going to resurrect the 1 - 2 mil dead that the war in Iraq has caused? And do you really think the war in Iraq is over now? That's what was expected in -03 and it didn't quite happen. And with the majority of US troops pulling out in -09 or -10 the latest I think we can be pretty secure (or unsecure) in the notion that there will be similar attacks against them to the end of the US presence in Iraq.

The final bodycount for US will be around 5, 6 thousand +, including the coalition & the mercenaries ~ 6000 - 7000. Dunno about you but to me, that's a lot of dead folks. For the US ally Iraqi troops, god only knows. Tens of thousands? And in the end Iraq will continue to be a pretty unstable place with the table set up for a new dictator to step up.

Oh yea and in Afghanistan it looks like the Taliban are getting their act together and inflicting serious casualties against the troops there. I have a buddy there with the UN troops and according to him it don't look too good.

edit. Although I have to say that I don't expect the democrats to do any better.