What could the TMAP-chunk be? - Page 3

DivingDuck · 04-16-07, 10:11 AM

Moin Skwasjer,

I could need your advice. Please PM me!

Regards,
DD

DivingDuck · 06-22-07, 08:38 PM

Moin,

I´ve compared a 3d object´s triangles data with TMAP data. Here´s my problem:

Any suggestions?

Regards,
DD

skwasjer · 06-23-07, 01:43 PM

See my e-mail to you yesterday. They are 3 ushorts, and represent indexes. These indexes refer to the array of UV's (texture coordinates). The TMAP is exactly the same, also 3 ushorts (per face) with indexes refering to the array of UV's.

[edit] The reason you encounter values that are 'higher' than the number of vertices is because each model (99% of them anyway) has more texture coordinates than vertices. Check the UV array for it's length and values, then check the TMAP section and see that they share indexes, but can also have unique ones (which may result in index values exceeding the vertex count).

urfisch · 06-26-07, 05:35 AM

great! any conclusion on that?

04-16-07, 10:11 AM	#31
DivingDuck Grey Wolf Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Germany Posts: 902 Downloads: 10 Uploads: 1	Moin Skwasjer, I could need your advice. Please PM me! Regards, DD __________________ http://www.filefront.com/user/DivingDuck \| OpenHatch_V3_RH (SHIII)

06-22-07, 08:38 PM	#32
DivingDuck Grey Wolf Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Germany Posts: 902 Downloads: 10 Uploads: 1	Moin, I´ve compared a 3d object´s triangles data with TMAP data. Here´s my problem: Any suggestions? Regards, DD __________________ http://www.filefront.com/user/DivingDuck \| OpenHatch_V3_RH (SHIII)

06-26-07, 05:35 AM	#34
urfisch Sea Lord Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Deep down in Germany Posts: 1,969 Downloads: 42 Uploads: 0	great! any conclusion on that? __________________

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

06-23-07, 01:43 PM	#33
skwasjer The Old Man Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Netherlands Posts: 1,549 Downloads: 28 Uploads: 3	See my e-mail to you yesterday. They are 3 ushorts, and represent indexes. These indexes refer to the array of UV's (texture coordinates). The TMAP is exactly the same, also 3 ushorts (per face) with indexes refering to the array of UV's. [edit] The reason you encounter values that are 'higher' than the number of vertices is because each model (99% of them anyway) has more texture coordinates than vertices. Check the UV array for it's length and values, then check the TMAP section and see that they share indexes, but can also have unique ones (which may result in index values exceeding the vertex count).