SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-08-06, 10:23 AM   #1
madDdog67
Loader
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: VA, USA
Posts: 84
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SubSerpent


Vote Democrat in '08 and get at least a president and administration that is into "straight" sex with adults. Can we have Clinton back now, please?
You *might* want to google the names Gerry Studds and Mel Reynolds.

Studds actually buggered his 17 year old Page...and Reynolds was convicted on about 12 counts stemming from his sexual relationship with a 15 year old girl. At this point, all we know about Foley is that he sent some very innappropriate emails and text messages.

Oh yeah, let's not forget about old William "No, I DON'T know how $90,000 in marked bills got in my freezer!" Jefferson, and Alan Mollihan, both currently under FBI investigation for various acts of alleged skullduggery.

Before you get all up in arms, let me assure you I'm a "pox on BOTH their houses" kinda person...I don't drink either side's Kool Aid. I've worked in a business that involves the Congress for 20 years...and I can tell you without any reservation whatsoever that members of BOTH sides of the aisle have/still do engage in the same kinds of questionable behavior. That doesn't, by any stretch, make it right...but the premise that one side is better/worse than the other is laughable, given the history of the institution.
madDdog67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-06, 07:06 AM   #2
sonar732
The Old Man
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Central MO
Posts: 1,562
Downloads: 6
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by madDdog67
Quote:
Originally Posted by SubSerpent


Vote Democrat in '08 and get at least a president and administration that is into "straight" sex with adults. Can we have Clinton back now, please?
You *might* want to google the names Gerry Studds and Mel Reynolds.

Studds actually buggered his 17 year old Page...and Reynolds was convicted on about 12 counts stemming from his sexual relationship with a 15 year old girl. At this point, all we know about Foley is that he sent some very innappropriate emails and text messages.

Oh yeah, let's not forget about old William "No, I DON'T know how $90,000 in marked bills got in my freezer!" Jefferson, and Alan Mollihan, both currently under FBI investigation for various acts of alleged skullduggery.

Before you get all up in arms, let me assure you I'm a "pox on BOTH their houses" kinda person...I don't drink either side's Kool Aid. I've worked in a business that involves the Congress for 20 years...and I can tell you without any reservation whatsoever that members of BOTH sides of the aisle have/still do engage in the same kinds of questionable behavior. That doesn't, by any stretch, make it right...but the premise that one side is better/worse than the other is laughable, given the history of the institution.
Exactly! It makes me sick to see both parties do a tit-for-tat comparison of who's scandle is worse and to hide their own immoral behavior.

I couldn't believe though to see my former congressman from Illinois, Ray LaHood, turn the scandle into a blaming game on the page program instead of blaming the man who engaged in inappropriate IM's and emails.

For those of you who say he didn't really do anything...shame on you! I am a father of 4 girls and one step-son who don't have access to the internet because of people like Foley.
sonar732 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-06, 07:36 AM   #3
Takeda Shingen
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,643
Downloads: 19
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sonar732
Quote:
Originally Posted by madDdog67
Quote:
Originally Posted by SubSerpent


Vote Democrat in '08 and get at least a president and administration that is into "straight" sex with adults. Can we have Clinton back now, please?
You *might* want to google the names Gerry Studds and Mel Reynolds.

Studds actually buggered his 17 year old Page...and Reynolds was convicted on about 12 counts stemming from his sexual relationship with a 15 year old girl. At this point, all we know about Foley is that he sent some very innappropriate emails and text messages.

Oh yeah, let's not forget about old William "No, I DON'T know how $90,000 in marked bills got in my freezer!" Jefferson, and Alan Mollihan, both currently under FBI investigation for various acts of alleged skullduggery.

Before you get all up in arms, let me assure you I'm a "pox on BOTH their houses" kinda person...I don't drink either side's Kool Aid. I've worked in a business that involves the Congress for 20 years...and I can tell you without any reservation whatsoever that members of BOTH sides of the aisle have/still do engage in the same kinds of questionable behavior. That doesn't, by any stretch, make it right...but the premise that one side is better/worse than the other is laughable, given the history of the institution.
Exactly! It makes me sick to see both parties do a tit-for-tat comparison of who's scandle is worse and to hide their own immoral behavior.

I couldn't believe though to see my former congressman from Illinois, Ray LaHood, turn the scandle into a blaming game on the page program instead of blaming the man who engaged in inappropriate IM's and emails.

For those of you who say he didn't really do anything...shame on you! I am a father of 4 girls and one step-son who don't have access to the internet because of people like Foley.
And now you understand my revulsion with the American political universe. The day that the Foley scandal aired, the pundits of the Right were out in force, and Studs and Reynolds were touted as an example of "See, they did bad stuff too!". So what? Does the guilt of the opposing party absolve your own? The two-party system in American politics must change, or we will stagnate, and stagnation is death. Rome was not destroyed from the outside. It was torn asunder from within.

A wonderful piece of news from this: The Evangelical base of the Republican party has, reportedly, felt quite betrayed as of late, by the very people who they voted into office. Properly stoked, this has the potential to become a split within the party. It might even become two parties. If this were to happen, it would encourage other elements within both parties to follow suit. We may be witnessing the death knell of the paleolithic two-party system. I welcome it.
Takeda Shingen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-06, 10:56 AM   #4
The Avon Lady
Über Mom
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Jerusalem, Israel
Posts: 6,147
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Takeda Shingen
And now you understand my revulsion with the American political universe. The day that the Foley scandal aired, the pundits of the Right were out in force, and Studs and Reynolds were touted as an example of "See, they did bad stuff too!".
Funny. What I saw first all over the Internet was leftist democrats and anti-Americans making this a Republican issue.

And that's certainly the way it started being reported here on the forum. Check out this Subsim thread. This was typical of what was initially sprouting up all over leftist blogs around the Web and not vice versa.
__________________


"Victory will come to us from the wombs of our women."
- Houari Boumedienne, President of Algeria, Speech before the UN, 1974
The Avon Lady is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-06, 12:36 PM   #5
_Seth_
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: In Tromsoe, @Tirpitz' final resting place..
Posts: 3,277
Downloads: 94
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SubSerpent
Quote:
Originally Posted by NEON DEON
Georgie not only is playing hide and go seek with privacey complaints in reference to Homeland Security but also making looney comments Too.

"Bush, for example, said he'd disregard a requirement that the director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency must have at least five years experience and "demonstrated ability in and knowledge of emergency management and homeland security."

His rationale was that it "rules out a large portion of those persons best qualified by experience and knowledge to fill the office.""

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061005/...h/bush_privacy

This one is for you sub.

ROFLMAO!!!! :rotfl:

Another example of Herr Bush doing as he pleases and further putting our nation as well as the world at risk to terror.

I wouldn't let Bush supervise my toilet! Come On! What is up with this guy?!?! He's just missing the Hitler mustache! Other than that, he's identical in every other way!

On another note:

I also noted today that Mark Foley is making accustations that a priest molested him when he was young, and that he is not responsible for his actions by talking sexually with underage boys over the Internet and sending them pictures of his private parts. And to think that someone on here was stating just the other day that, "at least we republicans don't try to blame others for our actions"!!!!That is obviously now a crock of shiznut!

Got to love American politics! It's almost like watching a very dramatic soap opera, "And these are the days of Herr Bush's life".

Honestly, I think this country would be better run by bottle of stool softner!


ROFLMAO!!! :rotfl:


Vote Democrat in '08 and get at least a president and administration that is into "straight" sex with adults. Can we have Clinton back now, please?
__________________


_Seth_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-06, 12:12 PM   #6
kholemann
Gunner
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 98
Downloads: 27
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NEON DEON
Georgie not only is playing hide and go seek with privacey complaints in reference to Homeland Security but also making looney comments Too.

"Bush, for example, said he'd disregard a requirement that the director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency must have at least five years experience and "demonstrated ability in and knowledge of emergency management and homeland security."

His rationale was that it "rules out a large portion of those persons best qualified by experience and knowledge to fill the office.""


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061005/...h/bush_privacy

This one is for you sub.
Every four years the people of the United States elect a President. Anyone who runs for President (that is not an incumbent) has no experience as President. I guess with your thinking we should only elect Presidents with experience being President.
kholemann is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.