![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
View Poll Results: Which prop design is better | |||
Slower threshold for cavitation but higher top speed |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
5 | 35.71% |
Higher threshold for cavitation but slower top speed |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
9 | 64.29% |
Voters: 14. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#16 | |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |
XO
![]() Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 435
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
XO
![]() Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 435
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
If talking about speed on a batttery the USS Albacore, while a non-combat vessel, topped out at 30+ knots. According to some reports, it was faster than the Skipjack class and was the fastest US submarine until the Seawolf class come onto the scene.
Moral: Battery does NOT equal slow speed. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]() Quote:
![]() Are there still direct drive boats? :hmm: ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Sub Test Pilot
|
![]()
I dont think so, but there is also AIP to bring into this.
__________________
DONT FORGET if you like a post to nominate it by using the blue diamond ![]() ![]() ![]() Find out about Museum Ships here: https://www.museumships.us/ Flickr for all my pictures: https://www.flickr.com/photos/131313936@N03/ Navy general board articles: https://www.navygeneralboard.com/author/aegis/ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|