SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-30-11, 02:00 PM   #16
Sailor Steve
Eternal Patrol
 
Sailor Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: High in the mountains of Utah
Posts: 50,369
Downloads: 745
Uploads: 249


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainMattJ. View Post
Well, the iowa couldve most certainly held her own in a 1 on 1. Had we not utilized radar guided FCS systems, the battle wouldve most likely have gone to yamato. Her 18.1 inch batteries and thick armor would be the obstacles to overcome. But, under even circumstance, the iowa couldve simply outgunned the Yamato from afar, using her superior top speeds and more accurate shots to pound at her from beyond the accurate range of Yamatos guns.
It's an old truism in warship design that you can't know the actual power of the enemy's guns, so you can only armor against your own. Iowa was armored against her own 16" guns, and Yamato was armored against her own 18" guns, and in both cases that armor was only good at long ranges. Close in there is no armor that can stop any decent shell of comparable value. The good news is that the 18" guns may have carried more powder but actually had slightly inferior penetration.

As for "outgunning from afar", that is by no means guaranteed. Unfortunately superior fire control has never been proven superior. The longest shot ever achieved against a moving target was roughly 26,000 yards, and that was more luck than skill. More likely no one would have been hitting until around 20,000 yards, and at that range Yamato's fire control was perfectly adequate. I agree, an Iowa could likely have "held her own", but the outcome was hardly certain, and that certainty is needed in any naval conflict.
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.”
—Rocky Russo
Sailor Steve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-11, 02:21 PM   #17
Torplexed
Let's Sink Sumptin' !
 
Torplexed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 5,823
Downloads: 43
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CCIP View Post
Nevertheless, shrewd of them to consider it an extreme threat and counter it with numbers. When in doubt, prepare for worst-case.
The Japanese themselves made some rather shrewd guesses at what the United States was then designing, based largely on the assumption that any U.S. battleship would be designed to fit through the Panama Canal. Japanese intelligence estimated that future U.S. battleships would displace 35,000 tons, would have a speed of 33 knots and a main battery of nine 16" (406mm) guns, and would have a length of 880 feet (268 meters). In fact, the Iowas displaced 45,000 tons, had a speed of 33 knots and main battery of nine 16"/50 guns, and had a waterline length of 860 feet (262 meters). It is fair to say that the Yamatos were designed specifically to outclass the then unknown Iowas.

The Yamatos were also constructed in great secrecy behind giant curtains of sisal rope and mats. Workers were under pain of death to ensure that no plans, drawings or photos of them ever left the dockyard area. The deceptions were so successful that the American Consulate, located across the bay from Musashi's construction site, was completely unaware of her existence during the construction.
__________________

--Mobilis in Mobili--
Torplexed is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.