![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#16 |
XO
![]() Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 408
Downloads: 124
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
*fixed* sorry i was laughing too hard
btw this tool is nice... but unluckily not available in europe at this time.
__________________
~^~ War does not determine who is right - only who is left. ~^~ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Banana Republic of Germany
Posts: 6,170
Downloads: 62
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
If I had not been convinced before that it is impossible to win a war against China I surely would be now.
![]()
__________________
Putting Germ back into Germany. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,405
Downloads: 31
Uploads: 0
|
China is becoming more direct and challenging in its dealings with Washington. That has little to do with the tactical or strategic matters of Taiwan (Formosa), and much to do with the person sitting in the chair as President.
China would have little struggle taking Taiwan, it would simply have a hard time holding on to it - IF the US followed through on its obligations. I for one think China could invade and the current administration would make alot of noise, but do nothing.
__________________
Good Hunting! Captain Haplo ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |
Chief of the Boat
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]()
LOL I'm reading that right now! Soooo.... don't spoil it I'm at the part where the PLA has just started to cross the Russian border and the US is moving the armored troops on the trans-Siberian railway.
Quote:
This is an interesting read on the subject of China invading Taiwan: www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/2009/RAND_MG888.pdf ^use direct link and not the linked text. Last edited by TLAM Strike; 06-10-10 at 11:49 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
Rear Admiral
![]() Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: SPACE!!!!
Posts: 10,142
Downloads: 85
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
@ PhantomLord
Wow, the swiss army knife of shovels.
__________________
Task Force industries "Taking control of the world, one mind at a time" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 | |
Lucky Jack
![]() |
![]() Quote:
Thanks for the link, although you might want to knock the radio-room link off the front of it because at the moment it's sending to Subsim front page, I managed to twig the link you meant to post though ![]() ![]() Oh...and...DAMN I WANT one of those shovels NOW!! ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 | |
Ocean Warrior
![]() Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Auburn, Alabama
Posts: 3,333
Downloads: 101
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 | |
Lucky Jack
![]() |
![]() Quote:
I've thought of another use for that shovel. Cooking Pan. I've seen Russian soldiers use their shovels in that way before, so it shouldn't be too difficult to do the same thing. Heck, steam train drivers in the UK cooked (and still cook) with their coal shovels, so if they can, the Chinese sure can too! ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
Rear Admiral
![]() |
![]()
Personally, i think we'll eventually be at war with Iran, or china, or both at some point in the future. China is becoming a superpower, and it's going to flex its muscle at some point.
China is also, from what i can tell, the industralized nation that the US was during WW2. If we were in an open war with them, they'd probably outproduce us both in warm bodies, and war material from all the manufactering capability that used to be here, but is now there. Yeah we'll be strong in our conviction that because were America we'll endure and prevail, but the thing is America was bought, sold and traded for years ago, and China owns a good portion of it. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 | |
Chief of the Boat
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
Fleet Admiral
![]() |
![]()
How many American lives is Taiwan worth?
__________________
abusus non tollit usum - A right should NOT be withheld from people on the basis that some tend to abuse that right. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,405
Downloads: 31
Uploads: 0
|
Platypus - its not really a question of how many "American" lives is Taiwan worth.....
What matters is we are obligated under treaty to protect and defend Taiwan. The question should thus be - How many lives are worth America honoring its treaty obligations......
__________________
Good Hunting! Captain Haplo ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 | |
Fleet Admiral
![]() |
![]() Quote:
The Mutual Defense Treaty was ended by the United States in 1980 http://www.taiwandocuments.org/mutual01.htm The Taiwan Relations Act is not a treaty but a federal law. The wording of the act is an example of the art of obfuscation and ambiguity. Nowhere in the act, nor in the Six Assurances, does it legally obligate that the United States will engage the PRC in military action if the PRC invades Taiwan. The TRA is a delicate balancing act concerning our relationships with both sides. It leaves just enough ambiguity not to get the Chinese spun up too much, but just enough clarity to keep the Taiwanese spun-down. I suppose I should not resist making a pun about being caught between a ROC and a hard place. ![]() The TRA does obligate the US to sell defensive arms to Taiwan. Few Presidents, Republican or Democratic, seem eager to back themselves into a most unpleasant corner on this issue. This article gives a pretty good summation of the issue: http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/20...nse_huang.aspx All the TRA does is give the President the option of taking military action, but since he already has that power, that portion of the TRA is moot as it, in no way, legally obligates the President to take military action.
__________________
abusus non tollit usum - A right should NOT be withheld from people on the basis that some tend to abuse that right. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
Rear Admiral
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|