![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Ocean Warrior
![]() |
![]() Quote:
__________________
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | ||
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,501
Downloads: 19
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
Seriously though, when considered in toto, it's not as risky as first seemed. The ships were well supported by Destroyers and aircraft, with the likelyhood of enemy ships of the same size being in the Channel, or having the time to intercept, being virtually nil. Such protection could not be afforded if going the long way around. When you consider a) Hitler was convinced of an Allied invasion of Norway, which could potentially have put the ships right in the middle and b) the ships were not at full order, the Channel dash was perhaps the less risky of the two options as it limited the time the ships were exposed. More crucial to the success was that the Brits expected/hoped/assumed that the Germans would pass through Dover - the most dangerous part - at night, but as we all know the opposite happened. Thus the Brits lost the element of surprise that they'd of had if the ships left Brest at daylight. The Germans obviously knew this. I think it was a great strategic decision. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |||
Ocean Warrior
![]() |
![]() Quote:
Thanx for answer, matey!! ![]() ![]()
__________________
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|