More Than 650 International Scientists Dissent (Global warming merged)

[Letum]

Ah but it is very much about attacking his data!
to the tune of half million square kilometers.

[SUBMAN1]

Originally Posted by Letum

Ah but it is very much about attacking his data!
to the tune of half million square kilometers.

Well, I have a hard time reading a scientific account or article that attacks a man at its outset. This tells me they are trying to discredit him prior to your reading what is supposed to be scientific data. This is to create an idiot mindset before you get to their main point.

Extremely bad journalism. You already lost me at this point.

-S

[Letum]

It is not attacking the man at all.
It is attacking his science; which, even you must admit, is appealingly flawed.

To attack the man you would have to comment on his BO or some such.

[SUBMAN1]

Originally Posted by Letum

It is not attacking the man at all.
It is attacking his science; which, even you must admit, is appealingly flawed.

To attack the man you would have to comment on his BO or some such.

No, they latched on to some article that was totally unrelated. Even if he made a mistake, this shouldn't be the case.

Also, if it is absolutely neccesary, you make that argument at the end. Not as the main thrust of the article in the beginning. That is pretty pathetic.

-S

[Kipparikalle]

Looks like the EA boys could foresee the future, when they were making the Battlefield 2142.

In today's world, games foresee our future

[Hylander_1314]

Originally Posted by SUBMAN1

Here is a video for you guys to watch:

http://www.discovery.org/v/30

-S

That's about the 50th scientific platform I've seen where they make one big point. CO2 follows temperature increase, not the other way 'round. Also it shows that solar activity is the biggest factor, if not "the" main determining factor.

So maybe Al Gore and company ought to figure out how to control sunspot activity instead of carbon output. Just another way to use scare tactics to tax tax tax.

One thing noted in the docuentary Little Iceage Big Chill, was that the early astonomers noted that during the cooling period there was very little sunspot activity. So again the sun, is the biggest player at the table.

Good posts there Subman1

[Stealth Hunter]

Originally Posted by SUBMAN1

Already did tens times over. Maybe you just don't read? You are rehashing crap! But maybe your head is stuck in a perpetual loop. That is pretty likely.

-S

You posted one thing to attempt to refute my points, and I explained why CO2 does play a measurable role in affecting the climate.

:rotfl:

I gotta tell you, Sub, I really do hope you keep going with your "evil Atheists" and other general conspiracy threads. I wouldn't have you any other way.

[Stealth Hunter]

Originally Posted by SUBMAN1

Here is a video for you guys to watch:

http://www.discovery.org/v/30

-S

From the same people who defend the principle that Earth is 6,000 years old?

[Stealth Hunter]

Originally Posted by SUBMAN1

Oh guess what? Antarctica is getting colder, not warmer:

http://www.csmonitor.com/2002/0118/p02s01-usgn.html

Must be a fluke! :p:p

-S

Again, from the same people who defend the cultist idea that Earth is 6,000 years old?

Come on Sub. Why not use a peer-reviewed scientific article instead of all this Christian science claptrap?

[Stealth Hunter]

Originally Posted by SUBMAN1

Google is my friend today. Check this one! If Kyoto is 'true', we have supposedely spent $580,000,000,000 so far for a temperature savings of 0.006007916 °C!!!!!! hahahahahahahaha! This is just great!

http://www.junkscience.com/MSU_Temps/Kyoto_Count_Up.htm

-S

"Updated Again: September 23, 2005"

BTW, the temperature thing increased on my browser.

[SUBMAN1]

Originally Posted by Stealth Hunter

"Updated Again: September 23, 2005"

BTW, the temperature thing increased on my browser.

Yes, it increases by the tiniest fraction every hundred years. Keep watching. You are about to grow a very long beard and waste your entire life for something that is unfounded.

-S

[SUBMAN1]

Originally Posted by Stealth Hunter

Again, from the same people who defend the cultist idea that Earth is 6,000 years old?

Come on Sub. Why not use a peer-reviewed scientific article instead of all this Christian science claptrap?

Again you discount information, no matter how true by unrelated events. How are those blinders? You should try taking them off sometime and actually think for yourself. Such a concept!

-S

[Onkel Neal]

Subman, I do not know why this subject is so crashingly important to you, but that's ok, just try to keep it to one thread. Thanks

Neal

[Stealth Hunter]

Originally Posted by SUBMAN1

Again you discount information, no matter how true by unrelated events. How are those blinders? You should try taking them off sometime and actually think for yourself. Such a concept!

-S

:rotfl:

Congrats Sub. The conspiracy that global warming is a hoax made the news:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/pict...y.html?image=1

Well hey, it might not have made it to number one, but that doesn't mean it won't get there someday.

Ho-hum. Putting laughs and lollygags aside, I have chosen to think for myself, and the evidence is telling me that global warming is not a conspiracy. It's also telling me that there's irony afoot here. You claim to be thinking for yourself, but you don't do actual research into topics like this. Have you even been to NASA's Goddard Center? Goddard offers some great tours and lectures on their programs, and they have a great exhibit on climate change.

Originally Posted by SUBMAN1

Yes, it increases by the tiniest fraction every hundred years. Keep watching. You are about to grow a very long beard and waste your entire life for something that is unfounded.

Given that they base their numbers off hypothetical estimates and not actual daily measurements like the scientists do, I'd say that overrules their reliability (but perhaps not their credibility; they have some great articles now and then). So yes, I would be wasting my time.

[Hylander_1314]

Hey Subman, here's an interesting article on the topic.

http://lib.store.yahoo.net/lib/reali...lcontinue.html