![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
View Poll Results: Which version of TSWSM are you looking forward to? | |||
Version 1 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
156 | 20.77% |
Version 2 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
79 | 10.52% |
Version 3 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
29 | 3.86% |
Version 4 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
77 | 10.25% |
All of them |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
488 | 64.98% |
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 751. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Mexico, USA
Posts: 9,023
Downloads: 8
Uploads: 2
|
![]()
That's OK, I had too many beers to write "too" instead of "to," myself
![]() Self-pwnage, gotta love it :rotfl: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Mexico, USA
Posts: 9,023
Downloads: 8
Uploads: 2
|
![]()
Regarding major surface naval battles... still not seeing it. WThere were really not many engagements of surface forces (not counting minor combatant classes). There are single surface engagements in the PTO with more shots fired I bet than all the KM surface battles combined.
Just saying that for surface warfare, nothing beats the PTO. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Planesman
![]() Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 184
Downloads: 23
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Well if you think early war you have all the actions of the German surface fleet commerce raiding , battle of the river plate , actions involving the bismark , sinking of the Scharn etc. PTOs ok , but regarding actual ship to ship , rather than air to ship or actions involving carriers there isnt so much
Last edited by tomhugill; 12-03-08 at 11:12 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Mexico, USA
Posts: 9,023
Downloads: 8
Uploads: 2
|
![]() Quote:
Commerce raiding? Yeah, a warship vs unarmed merchants, there's a major naval engagement. The other actions are a handful of ships at best. Your understanding of the Pacific naval war is deeply flawed. There were many surface actions between major warships. The Solomons alone exceed all the surface actions between the Germans and Allies combined. Yes, there were a number of small engagements between BB/BCs in the ATO and Med. There were fewer pure BB/BC engagements in the PTO. Once you bother to include CA actions and smaller (still DDs and larger) it skyrockets in the PTO. Just Guadalcanal stuff (only warships listed, total numbers for both sides together): Savo 15 Cruisers, 16 DDs. Battle of Cape Esperance, 7 Cruisers, 13 DD, 2 AS. Naval Battle of Guadalcanal, 1 CV, 4 BB, 13 CA/CL, 28 DD. Battle of Tassafaronga, 5 CA/CL, 12 DD. That's 4 months in the PTO. tater Last edited by tater; 12-04-08 at 10:58 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Stavka
Posts: 8,211
Downloads: 13
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
The Naval Battle of Guadalcanal cannot be counted as 1 battle, it was 2 battles with different Task Forces fighting in both
Anyway, the Solomon Islands campaigns also had about a dozen engagements between the Tokyo Express and interdicting US TGs which were pure surface actions (No aircraft at night) But...don't forget the Med battles between the Regia Marina and the Royal Navy (I would even go as far as saying the Regia Marina's surface fleet being more powerful than the Kriegsmarine's), these regularly involved several battleships on both sides And the RM never had a CV AFAIK (Aquila was never finished)
__________________
Current Eastern Front status: Probable Victory Last edited by Raptor1; 12-04-08 at 02:35 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Planesman
![]() Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 184
Downloads: 23
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Well im happy to be wrong , this is why im not writing the campaign
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Mexico, USA
Posts: 9,023
Downloads: 8
Uploads: 2
|
![]()
Raptor, you are correct, I was generalizing the 1st/2d Naval Battles of Guadalcanal, and regarding the RM's CV. I thought she was finished. I do agree, however, that the RM was a more balanced navy than the KM, though. You're right about all the Cactus Express (aka Tokyo Express) engagements. I was just counting the major engagements.
I'm not down on surface actions anywhere, gotta love 'em, just that the PTO is often wrongly characterized as an exclusively CV show, when that is clearly not true. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Chief of the Boat
|
![]() Quote:
http://www.comandosupremo.com/Aquila.html
__________________
Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something.
Oh my God, not again!! GWX3.0 Download Page - Donation/instant access to GWX (Help SubSim) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | ||
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Stavka
Posts: 8,211
Downloads: 13
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Current Eastern Front status: Probable Victory |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|