SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-25-08, 12:36 PM   #1
Dowly
Lucky Jack
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Finland
Posts: 25,053
Downloads: 32
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skybird
Quote:
Originally Posted by antikristuseke
What was the purpuse of tazering him?
I have reached the opinion that tazers more and more are getting used preemptively and for disciplinary measures. Both is unacceptable. Tazers exclusively should be used in cases of police being attacked by suspects turning clearly violent against them. not following orders fast enough, or sanctionising unwanted behavior, are not sufficient reasons to tazer somebody. the police is not the judge. Doing so is not different to beating up a suspect because of his "suspicious dark skin colour". tazers are meant to be non-lethal weapons of self-defense - not more and not less. what we currently hear with regularity, is a clear abuse of the intention behind their introduction.
Couldnt agree more!
Dowly is offline  
Old 09-25-08, 12:49 PM   #2
Konovalov
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: High Wycombe, Bucks, UK
Posts: 2,811
Downloads: 9
Uploads: 0
Default

I don't understand how much of a threat one man can pose on a 2nd floor ledge for him to be tazered. On the face of it this strikes me as just plain crazy.
__________________
"In a Christian context, sexuality is traditionally seen as a consequence of the Fall, but for Muslims, it is an anticipation of paradise. So I can say, I think, that I was validly converted to Islam by a teenage French Jewish nudist." Sheikh Abdul-Hakim Murad (Timothy Winter)
Konovalov is offline  
Old 09-25-08, 12:55 PM   #3
Mikhayl
Captain
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 485
Downloads: 64
Uploads: 0
Default

Yeah, some cops seem to think that since it's a (supposedly) non-lethal weapon, then they can use it at will. Morons
Mikhayl is offline  
Old 09-25-08, 02:36 PM   #4
Happy Times
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Finland
Posts: 2,950
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dowly
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skybird
Quote:
Originally Posted by antikristuseke
What was the purpuse of tazering him?
I have reached the opinion that tazers more and more are getting used preemptively and for disciplinary measures. Both is unacceptable. Tazers exclusively should be used in cases of police being attacked by suspects turning clearly violent against them. not following orders fast enough, or sanctionising unwanted behavior, are not sufficient reasons to tazer somebody. the police is not the judge. Doing so is not different to beating up a suspect because of his "suspicious dark skin colour". tazers are meant to be non-lethal weapons of self-defense - not more and not less. what we currently hear with regularity, is a clear abuse of the intention behind their introduction.
Couldnt agree more!
x3 Its not ment for that, it is suppose to be replacement for a gun.
Happy Times is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.