|
|
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997
|
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
|
08-21-08, 12:46 PM
|
#1 |
|
Admiral
 Join Date: May 2005
Location: Berlin
Posts: 2,015
Downloads: 165
Uploads: 0
|
Just realized I made a mistake in my last posts, it should be 2000km according to your screen, not 1000km!
But I already checked 2000km is way too much that way Japanese aircover extends all the way into Australia. So can we find a reasonable value, like 1200km radius or such? For comparison, aircoverage with 2000km radius, way unrealistic imo: 
__________________
|
|
|
|
08-21-08, 12:52 PM
|
#2 |
|
Admiral
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Berlin
Posts: 2,015
Downloads: 165
Uploads: 0
|
This is a new variant with 1200 km radius now, date is 1.1.1943
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
08-21-08, 01:07 PM
|
#3 |
|
Lucky Jack
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: In a 1954 Buick.
Posts: 28,282
Downloads: 90
Uploads: 0
|
Where are you going with this?
__________________
“You're painfully alive in a drugged and dying culture.” ― Richard Yates, Revolutionary Road |
|
|
|
|
08-21-08, 01:12 PM
|
#4 | |
|
Stowaway
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
|
Quote:
From docked ship to known convoy movement Taken from campaign file Very good to play and simulate intel given No airbase info in SH3Gen ( SH3 ) though so guess new for SH4 |
|
|
|
|
08-21-08, 01:09 PM
|
#5 |
|
Stowaway
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
|
As you say it not godlike but intel
 Any figure open to debate BTW In RL both H6K and H8K had range over 6500 KM  when overload
|
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
