![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Ace of the Deep
![]() Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,012
Downloads: 102
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
OK. Sounds reasonable. Which is the Japanese one? The taller mast or lower?
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Riverside, California
Posts: 3,610
Downloads: 41
Uploads: 5
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
![]() ROW Sound Effects Contributor RFB Team Leader |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Commodore
![]() Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 611
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I know this point has been made before, but inaccurate mast heights being inaccurate are kinda historically accurate. I dont think the Japanese let us climb there masts with our official U.S. Navy tape measure. I personally think that being off a foot or 2 is okay, but then again the same model is used so the guessed estimate should be the same.
![]() Kind of a conundrum... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Ace of the Deep
![]() Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,012
Downloads: 102
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
1. It is not a couple of feet it is 13.9
![]() 2.We aren't planning solutions in that real , past world. However, we are in this computerized version of it where lets face it..size matters. ![]()
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Commodore
![]() Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 611
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
:rotfl: |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|