How do you get the binos that show your bearing?

[i_b_spectre]

I believe GWX 2.1 removed the compass display from the binocs. Earlier versions of GWX had it, but the decision was made to take it out.

[Sailor Steve]

Yep. The bearing indicator comes with all versions of the game except GWX 2.1. They removed it partly because it's not realistic, and partly because so many of us requested it. One of them might know how you can put it back in.

[Teh_Diplomat]

Originally Posted by i_b_spectre

I believe GWX 2.1 removed the compass display from the binocs. Earlier versions of GWX had it, but the decision was made to take it out.

I guess in theory it does make sense, but in terms of practicability it's damaging.


Here's why: When your WO reports a spotted Ship/Airplane at a certain bearing it's best to use your Binocs to scope out the target. Realistically I assume the Captain would only use the UZO for surface attacks and not for general reconnaissance as it would be limited in its turn radius -as you obviously could not spin it around 180 degrees unless you were outside the Deck on the railings - thus the bearings were also put onto the binoculars.

The reason I assumed the bearings were on the Binocs was to spot targets and look an a reported target when given reports.


The bearings on a binocs is still more realistic than the UZO spinning around 360 degrees considering where it is placed on the deck.

[bobchase]

Teh_Diplomat

I agree with you but for a slightly different reason. Somewhere on this board Sailor Steve and I discussed it with some other folks. The short version of what I said was that a trained watch stander can call out a relative bearing angle of a sighting within 10 degrees or so. This is because that, unlike in the game, the watch stander gets to know what the bearing angle is of different parts of the ship when seen from his watch station. He gets to take his eyes off the contact, look at his ship on the same bearing, and make a mental calculation of the bearing angle before reporting in on the sound powered phones.

Realism is in the eye of the beholder...

Bob

[Brer Rabbit]

Done chucked my binocs overboard since they are now useless. It is difficult if not impossible to discern which direction you're looking. I cannot even depress them enough to see the bow or the stern much less the wake to even know if I;m looking forward or backward much less port of starboard. So much for realism, but frankly its a small price to pay for the overall package.

[msalama]

Sorry to interrupt you guys, but now that you're talking about the watch officer (amongst other things) let me please ask you something:

How the h*ll does the WO determine the range to the target as accurately as he does, and is his way of doing it realistic?

[joegrundman]

they had simple range finding apparatus, and i think that a practiced eye gets some accuracy - but no - it's not realistic.

Some of us avoid the WO for just this reason

my dream mod (but i don't think it can be done) would be to cut off the last 3 digits so you only get it to the nearest 1000m (rounded down) - that would be more reasonable i think

[msalama]

Thanks Joe