Horrid game performance...

AVGWarhawk · 05-02-08, 08:29 PM

I had the Geforce 6200. It struggled with the game. Get a better video card. Make sure your power supply is up to snuff so it can run the new card.

treblesum81 · 05-02-08, 08:39 PM

6200AX is the best card my pc can handle, unless I go back to ATI... No, if there isn't a way to make this work with my current setup, I'll return the game. It says on that "Can You Run It" site that I should be able to use this card specifically, so if I can't I'm not going to go out and buy a whole new card just to play one game.

So I guess the next best question before I go back to the store is:

Can SH4 and the GeForce 6200AX be tweaked to work well together (I want good smooth performance with medium graphics settings at the least), or is it a lost cause and I should just stick to SH3 and forget about SH4 until I upgrade my CPU in a year or two?

Syxx_Killer · 05-02-08, 08:46 PM

If I were you, I would at least hang onto SH4 and install it on your new computer whenever you get one. No sense in buying it again when you get a new rig.

Have you tried enabling Vsync? Also, have you tried running the game at the lowest settings and/or a lower resolution? You can enable graphic settings one at a time to see what your optimal setup might be.

stabiz · 05-02-08, 09:08 PM

There is no way you will be playing on medium settings with a 6200, alas.

MonTana_Prussian · 05-02-08, 11:36 PM

I'm using the 6200 and it's working great.

treblesum81 · 05-03-08, 01:31 AM

Quote:

I'm using the 6200 and it's working great.

Whats your setup then? What settings in game and on the 6200? I was able to tweak it up to about 15 frames which is playable, but not really acceptable, so any tips are gratefully appreciated.

maerean_m · 05-03-08, 04:35 AM

1. GeForce FX 6200 does not meet the recommended specs. It hardly meets the minimum requirements (for any game that has heard of Shader Model 3).

2. If you're running on an AGP motherboard (and I guess you do), you could get the nVidia 7800 GS (1500 points in 3D Mark 2006 SM3 test) or the ATi 3850 (which is twice as powerful: 3100 points in 3D Mark 2006 SM3 test).

AVGWarhawk · 05-03-08, 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by treblesum81

6200AX is the best card my pc can handle, unless I go back to ATI... No, if there isn't a way to make this work with my current setup, I'll return the game. It says on that "Can You Run It" site that I should be able to use this card specifically, so if I can't I'm not going to go out and buy a whole new card just to play one game.

So I guess the next best question before I go back to the store is:

Can SH4 and the GeForce 6200AX be tweaked to work well together (I want good smooth performance with medium graphics settings at the least), or is it a lost cause and I should just stick to SH3 and forget about SH4 until I upgrade my CPU in a year or two?

I don't understand. What do you mean the 6200 is as high as you can go? Your AGP slot should be able to handle a much higher card. I went to a AGP 7800GS and new power supply on my 3 year old Emachine. The Game runs great.

treblesum81 · 05-03-08, 11:40 AM

I had not done any video card research at all since this time last year, and at the time, the resources I had available to me pointed towards the 6200AX being about the most powerful card I could put in my machine...

forthermore, it no longer matters that there are more powerfull AGP cards out there as I will not buy another AGP card when my next computer will use PCI-E. The fact is... and this may sound ever so stubbourn, but its something we should all expect... that if the minimum reqs say one thing, and you have better than that, and the recommended reqs say even more, and you have at least that, and recommended reqs are usually benchmarked for medium level settings or better, you should be able to run the game at medium level settings or better. If, on the other hand, the the recommended settings will give you low frame rates on even a low setting and you shouldn't even bother to try it with the mins because you'll be so slow that you can't do anything.... well, in that case (which this seems to be) perhaps they should have made the recs the mins and been honest about what you'll need?

Now, that may sound like nothing but whining, but its just one possibility... Truth is, I can see that some people here are able to run the program with similar setups with only minor difficulty, so thats why I really want to know what their exact option setups are (card and game) so I can try to join the rest of you in the Pacific. So, again, if you've got a similar setup to mine and you've got the game working, please don't just tell me it works, but tell me what settings you have in place so i can replicate it possibly.

05-02-08, 08:29 PM	#1
AVGWarhawk Lucky Jack Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: In a 1954 Buick. Posts: 28,286 Downloads: 90 Uploads: 0	I had the Geforce 6200. It struggled with the game. Get a better video card. Make sure your power supply is up to snuff so it can run the new card. __________________ “You're painfully alive in a drugged and dying culture.” ― Richard Yates, Revolutionary Road

05-02-08, 09:08 PM	#4
stabiz Silent Hunter Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Norway Posts: 4,224 Downloads: 14 Uploads: 0	There is no way you will be playing on medium settings with a 6200, alas. __________________

05-03-08, 04:35 AM	#7
maerean_m Captain Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Bucharest, Romania Posts: 529 Downloads: 0 Uploads: 0	1. GeForce FX 6200 does not meet the recommended specs. It hardly meets the minimum requirements (for any game that has heard of Shader Model 3). 2. If you're running on an AGP motherboard (and I guess you do), you could get the nVidia 7800 GS (1500 points in 3D Mark 2006 SM3 test) or the ATi 3850 (which is twice as powerful: 3100 points in 3D Mark 2006 SM3 test). __________________ Kilroy was here

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

05-02-08, 08:39 PM	#2
treblesum81 Frogman Join Date: Apr 2008 Posts: 308 Downloads: 71 Uploads: 0	6200AX is the best card my pc can handle, unless I go back to ATI... No, if there isn't a way to make this work with my current setup, I'll return the game. It says on that "Can You Run It" site that I should be able to use this card specifically, so if I can't I'm not going to go out and buy a whole new card just to play one game. So I guess the next best question before I go back to the store is: Can SH4 and the GeForce 6200AX be tweaked to work well together (I want good smooth performance with medium graphics settings at the least), or is it a lost cause and I should just stick to SH3 and forget about SH4 until I upgrade my CPU in a year or two?

05-02-08, 08:46 PM	#3
Syxx_Killer Admiral Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Michigan, USA Posts: 2,387 Downloads: 21 Uploads: 0	If I were you, I would at least hang onto SH4 and install it on your new computer whenever you get one. No sense in buying it again when you get a new rig. Have you tried enabling Vsync? Also, have you tried running the game at the lowest settings and/or a lower resolution? You can enable graphic settings one at a time to see what your optimal setup might be.

05-02-08, 11:36 PM	#5
MonTana_Prussian Ensign Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Helena,Montana Posts: 234 Downloads: 0 Uploads: 0	I'm using the 6200 and it's working great.

05-03-08, 11:40 AM	#9
treblesum81 Frogman Join Date: Apr 2008 Posts: 308 Downloads: 71 Uploads: 0	I had not done any video card research at all since this time last year, and at the time, the resources I had available to me pointed towards the 6200AX being about the most powerful card I could put in my machine... forthermore, it no longer matters that there are more powerfull AGP cards out there as I will not buy another AGP card when my next computer will use PCI-E. The fact is... and this may sound ever so stubbourn, but its something we should all expect... that if the minimum reqs say one thing, and you have better than that, and the recommended reqs say even more, and you have at least that, and recommended reqs are usually benchmarked for medium level settings or better, you should be able to run the game at medium level settings or better. If, on the other hand, the the recommended settings will give you low frame rates on even a low setting and you shouldn't even bother to try it with the mins because you'll be so slow that you can't do anything.... well, in that case (which this seems to be) perhaps they should have made the recs the mins and been honest about what you'll need? Now, that may sound like nothing but whining, but its just one possibility... Truth is, I can see that some people here are able to run the program with similar setups with only minor difficulty, so thats why I really want to know what their exact option setups are (card and game) so I can try to join the rest of you in the Pacific. So, again, if you've got a similar setup to mine and you've got the game working, please don't just tell me it works, but tell me what settings you have in place so i can replicate it possibly.