![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Eternal Patrol
![]() |
![]() Quote:
But they couldn't.
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.” —Rocky Russo |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Ocean Warrior
![]() Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Kalamazoo, MI
Posts: 3,243
Downloads: 108
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
The speed of the german boats were impressive, but somthing tells me that they couldn't hold that for long.
basically, I don't think the boats were much more stealthy than a VIIC or IX, so sure, you could have a better shot at gettign away at 20knts in the electro boat, but eventually you will be found and you better hope your quiet.
__________________
Member of the Subsim Zombie Army |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: May 2008
Location: 1300 feet on the crapper
Posts: 1,860
Downloads: 2
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
The "Walther boat" used in the game is really a type XXI, that somehow had the Walter turbine. But the XXI boats without the H2O2 turbines could acheive 17 knts submerged, which is pretty good. It was propelled by 2 SSW 2500 bhp electric motors when submerged that coupled with it's streamlined hull made these speeds available.
It was the Wa201 type XVII that was deemed the true "Walter boat" in reference to Dr. Helmuth Walter. The H202 was broken down using a catalyst to provide steam and oxygen, them mixed with water and diesel fuel to produce combustion. The system worked superbly and was not a time bomb at all. One was even used by the Royal navy after the war and it was renamed the HMS Meteorite. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Admiral
![]() Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Suomi, sauna, puukko, perkele
Posts: 2,346
Downloads: 39
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: May 2008
Location: 1300 feet on the crapper
Posts: 1,860
Downloads: 2
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Admiral
![]() Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Suomi, sauna, puukko, perkele
Posts: 2,346
Downloads: 39
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | ||
Pacific Aces Dev Team
|
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
One day I will return to sea ... |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Grid CH 26, Spain ,Barcelona
Posts: 1,857
Downloads: 204
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
But this ship can't sink!... She is made of iron, sir. I assure you, she can. and she will. It is a mathematical certainty. Strength and honor |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: May 2005
Location: Somewhere over there
Posts: 834
Downloads: 46
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
The type XXI was the stopgap design based off of the failing type XVIII boat. Both were Walter designed. The type XXI's stearn and rudder were quite different from the proposed type XVIII.
Both designs had the figure eight hull cross section. On the type XVIII it was proposed for much of the lower section of the hull was to be tanks to hold the h2o2 to power the Walter turbine. The XXI utilized these tank areas for batteries, and a whole hell of a lot of batteries. The diesles of the type XXI were not directly connected to the propeller shafts and instead turned generators which charged the batteries, which in turn powered the drive motors for surface propulsion. Very similar to the American designs except faster underwater. The type XXIII was a replacement for the type II, and was also a Walter design with the figure 8 hull. But was never equipped with the turbine. It was just about the same length, but smaller on the inside, faster underwater, but not as fast as the XXI, and definitely not as deep diving. It was also armed less than the type II. (two torpedoes, compared to five of the type II) The type XVIII was in fact produced, but the hulls that were to be the type XVIII were redesignated for the NEWER, type XXI design. So no true examples of the type XVIII ever met the water. (thank god, for the crews of these explosive boats, and the crews of the convoys that would have been decimated by them) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Germany
Posts: 936
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
History and other things aside, the RN took up the Walther propulsion after the war with the Explorer class. The submarines were named "Exploder" class because of numerous explosions. Also known as the "blonde" class because in the 1950s h2o2 was mainly used to bleach the hair of Marilyn and the likes.
Actually, according to Wikipedia, the unarmed Explorer class was not thought as a proof of concept, but rather as a "disproof of concept"! The two subs were comissioned to prove they were NOT useful! Imagine serving on a sub build to fail.... Also these were supposed to simulate ASW targets, as many assumed the USSR would start mass producing Walter subs. The USSR AFAIK did never take up Walter engines for submarine propulsion, only for torpedoes. They did build the Quebec class submarines, but these used a closed cycle diesel, not a Walter turbine. I don't know how the RN did it, but in german service, the H2o2 was to be stored in rubber bladders suspended in the lower part of the vessel. This installation does not sound like it could stand a lot of depth charges.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 908
Downloads: 673
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Thing is guys, The British had bust the german coding, even when another wheel was added to the machine
Generally whitehall knew orders etc before the u-boat captains This was kept from the americans for sometime for one reason or another, several convoys were sacrificed to keep the secret safe (sad but in general you can see the point) So i'd guess the new sub/s would of been hunted down just like the older boats Thus maybe not having a massive impact as maybe thought My 2c worth
__________________
Have Fun Bye Def |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Stavka
Posts: 8,211
Downloads: 13
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
How...how old is this thread?
Anyway, the XVIIIs and the XXIs would probably not have changed the outcome of the Second Battle of the Atlantic, but they could very well have brought on a Third Happy Time because nearly every single standard Convoy escort vessel (DEs, Frigates and Corvettes) could not catch up with them
__________________
Current Eastern Front status: Probable Victory |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|