Idiot sci-fi question: Why do X-Wing fighters have…um…wings?

[Kazuaki Shimazaki II]

Originally Posted by SUBMAN1

Clearly, the wings have nothing to do with aerodynamics, as there is nothing aerodynamic about 99% of the vessels in the Star Wars universe, and almost everything short of the Death Star makes controlled landfall and takeoff. (Seriously, how does the Millennium Falcon do it? It’s a stunted frisbee! Eh, a question for another day…)

With the raw power of SW engines, it is possible to make a brick fly through the air, and dissipate or withstand the friction heat with shields and uber-hulls. This does not equate that aerodynamics does not help.

As to the suggestion that the so-called “S-foils” are used to generate deflector shields, that doesn’t explain how the other fighters in the Rebel fleet create defensive energy screens (well, maybe the B-Wing). It just doesn’t add up.

That the X-Wing employed a certain technical solution to a common problem does not equate that other technical solutions are impossible.

Now, I grant you, looking for science in Star Wars is a largely a futile gesture (Parsecs are a unit of distance, not time!)

They actually retconned this one in the EU by saying that Han Solo, flying a difficult course and cutting corners, managed to reduce the total distance of a trip by what must have been a tiny fraction, just enough to get it under 12 parsecs of distance.

[joea]

Ok I was wrong about the TIE fighters.



:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:

[SUBMAN1]

Well, here is what the rest of the world though about this question:

http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/geekend/?p=522

-S

[fatty]

I recall from a few of the X-Wing novels that the wings served two purposes. First, in their deployed mode, they spread the cannons far enough apart that their high-powered discharges wouldn't damage each other. Second, they provided improved maneuverability during combat in atmosphere. Yes, with enough engines and repulsorlifts anything could fly, but not necessarily fly well. In one of the books they state that the TIE fighters lost all of the maneuverability advantages they had in the vacuum of space when fighting the skies, and the X-Wings were able to fly circles around them.

[TLAM Strike]

Fatty is on the right track.

I have about as much sim-flight time in X-Wings as some around here have in say F-16s etc so...

The S-Foils do four things.
1) Places the cannons away from each other and the hull so they don't damage the X-Wing.
2) Repulsors on each wing add to monuverablity in atmo. Think about an minature X-Wing hovering in mid air, push at the far end of one S-Foil and what happens compared to pushing near the engines. A repulsor at the end of the S-Foil has a more dramadic effect.
3) Heat disspation without compamizing atmospheric handeling, Eyeballs (TIE Fighters to you non-Starfight folk) have huge pannels to disspate heat, in atmo those pannels act like massive speedbreaks in turning manuvers forcing the pilot to bank and then turn. X-Wings don't simply because the S-Foils allow air to flow around them.
4) Weapons Placment. The cannon are farther away from center giving the pilot a bigger cone of fire.