SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 11-18-07, 09:19 PM   #13
Chock
Sea Lord
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Under a thermal layer in chilly Olde England
Posts: 1,842
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

This of course doesn't take into account missile offerings from other nations, which negates the military budget spending argument being indicative of quality, since the cost is spread throughout many countries and many companies. The success of this approach to development can be seen in aircraft such as the Eurofighter Typhoon and the huge Airbus range, to name but two such ventures.

Many of the joint-developed missiles will see more sales simply because they do not come with 'strings attached' as most US, and to a large extent, Russian ones do. Which is also why Chinese ones are selling like hot cakes, because they don't give a toss who they sell to, sort of like the French in that respect. And this is an important factor; the British came very close to pulling out of the Joint Strike Fighter project because of these political strings when the Bush administration were refusing to allow sharing of some of the JSF technology in what was some extremely one-way traffic isolationism, this caused an impasse because the RAF insisted on being able to service their own aircraft domestically if need be. So much for the 'special relationship' eh?

There are many more missiles than the Russian and US offerings: You have the German-led IRIS-T thrust vectoring short range missile, the long range European MDBA Meteor, which has better radar jamming capabilities than either the Russian or US offerings, the DRDO Astra (still an unknown quantity but looks similar to a stretched Matra 530 to me, probably with Russian internals). DRDO are apparently considering reviving the Novator KS-172 ultra long range mach 4 anti-satellite missile too. Brazil has the Mectron MAA-1 Piranha. China has the short range PL-9, Britain the AIM-132 LOAL ASRAAM (itself developed to try and catch up with the Vympel R-73's (AA-11 Archer) capabilities, as indeed was the AIM-9X, which is ironic, since the R-73 is ancient by current Russian armament performance standards). And that's just a small selection that I can think of offhand.

It's not a two-horse race by any means.

Chock
__________________
Chock is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.