![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Ace of the Deep
![]() Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,134
Downloads: 93
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Well, thanks.
I suppose if I do any serious scenario development, I will do it for DW, since most of the community has moved on. That certainly should make the escort problem much easier to manage and if I can do zig and a zag with every other drift to clear baffles that should work very well. Now, since this is during a TRANSIT SEARCH, once the AI detects a contact will it forgo any further sprinting and prosecute the contact until it is confirmed safe?
__________________
War games, not wars! --- Only a small few profit from war (that should not stand)! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Electrician's Mate
![]() Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 140
Downloads: 8
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Ace of the Deep
![]() Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,134
Downloads: 93
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
If I go with DW instead of SC so that I can write scripts. Then, can I use anything from doctrine language in those scripts?
So, could I also make my script to retrieve the base course for the PIM (current leg). And then say randomly between 8-15 minutes and randomly for 10-30 degrees zig-zag? (Since I see that there a lots of good doctrine coding examples which I can utlize in the doctrine directory for SC/SCX/DW/LWAMI.) Thanks.
__________________
War games, not wars! --- Only a small few profit from war (that should not stand)! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|