![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Ace of the Deep
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 1,062
Downloads: 34
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
A nice intercept!
It's always nice if a plan comes together ![]() I have one comment though. A lone ship is always reported with speeds like slow or medium, unless BdU gives another contact report (like in your case). This is the weak point of any calculation. You took 6 but the range could have been 4-7 or even greater. What I do is calculate the position with a range of 7.5 when reported slow and then just wait for it. It's a bit dissapointing if it's much slower, but better than missing it altogether. With convoys, you can always read the exact speed from the contact report... There are a couple of other considerations as well. The contact report seems to be from 14:50. It is now 14:53. That's hardly any difference, but nexttime it may differ half an hour. It's just a matter of how quick you can get out of time compression. You also don't want to cross the target's path literally, because it can spot you an start zig-zagging. you want to lay and wait submerged. The range of view depends of the time of day, the wind speed and fog. I would say it's max 7000 meter I have made the convoy intercept 'theory' below which is based on some other basics that you can find on this forum, but has these things included in the calculation. ![]() Last edited by Canovaro; 09-07-07 at 05:58 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | ||||
Ace of the Deep
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Palm Beach, Florida
Posts: 1,243
Downloads: 53
Uploads: 8
|
![]()
I actually used MoBo pretty sparingly on this one... I thought some folks might like to see how easy it is to calibrate the TDC without a lot of complex measurements or AoB guesstimates. I spent zero time on visual observations. I was setting up the TDC before I ever saw the target.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Notice I did submerge well beyond visual range. The first time the target had any chance to spot me was when I peeked the scope out of the water at 1500m and had the ship in my sights at a bearing of about 25°. At which point, I was opening tube 1. Generally speaking, I try to station myself such that I can make the final approach submerged at 4kts regardless of which direction I'm coming from. So I try to intercept a station for a 4kt approach... not necessarily the direct method. As I mentioned, the initial stationing of this intercept is my favorite starting point because it decreases my workload by not having to plot an appropriate end-around. Quote:
![]() That circle diagram you posted is pretty clever... I like it. Last edited by XLjedi; 09-07-07 at 10:07 AM. |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |||||
Ace of the Deep
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 1,062
Downloads: 34
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
I would proceed on the surface with higher speed and then dive at the final point. You would stay on the run while submerged the last part. ![]() Quote:
Quote:
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Commodore
![]() Join Date: May 2007
Location: Sneek, The Netherlands
Posts: 635
Downloads: 43
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
So for a slow contact speed is between 4 and 7?
medium 8 and 10 and for fast anything faster than 10? am I right? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Ace of the Deep
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Palm Beach, Florida
Posts: 1,243
Downloads: 53
Uploads: 8
|
![]() Quote:
6 or 7 for slow (I favor 6) 8 or 9 for medium (I favor 8) ...and I've been guessing 16 at fast and haven't had much luck. Any recommendations there would be welcomed. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | ||
Ace of the Deep
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 1,062
Downloads: 34
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
A tanker I would guess 10 or 11. Warships can be anything between 9 and...35? 40? I don't know. ![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |||
Ace of the Deep
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Palm Beach, Florida
Posts: 1,243
Downloads: 53
Uploads: 8
|
![]() Quote:
When I've seen "task force" as the contact plot I've tried 16 and I haven't had much luck with that guess. Maybe 22? I think part of the problem is the blasted things are turning pretty tight patterns. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|