![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Master of Defense
![]() Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,502
Downloads: 125
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
Details here: http://www.cdi.org/Issues/NukeAccidents/accidents.htm |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | ||
Ace of the Deep
![]() Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Mesa AZ, Arizona, USA
Posts: 1,253
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Don't tell me there's no God after reading some of those accts. ![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Navy Seal
![]() |
Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||
Cold War Boomer
![]() Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Walla Walla
Posts: 2,837
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Gunner
![]() Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 95
Downloads: 14
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
Let\'s play Hide and Seek\'n\'Destroy! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |||
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: San Francisco, California
Posts: 1,633
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
U.Kdt.Hdb B. I. 28) This possibility of using the hydrophone to help in detecting surface ships should, however, be restricted to those cases where the submarine is unavoidably compelled to stay below the surface. http://www.hackworth.com/ |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Lucky Jack
![]() |
![]() Quote:
Anyway, aren't there still quite a few ICBMs at the bottom in sunken Boomers? K-219 for example, or even 19. I don't think any other country (with the possible exception of Chinas suspected second Xia) has lost a Boomer other than the old USSR. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Seasoned Skipper
![]() Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Morro Bay, Ca.
Posts: 659
Downloads: 79
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I don't know how the Air Farce runs their NUCWEPS programs, but this would never happen in the Navy. I won't go into the loading and storage procedures here but, suffice to say, any "Special" weapons would immediately be apparent. What is mystifying to me is that a weapons loadout check should be part of a preflight checklist and would show the type of weapons loaded and number in the weapons control console. That and any cursory examination of the weapons themselves that should have presumably been done as part of a visual inspection pre-flight should have raised a red flag as well. War shot ordnance is distinctly different from exercise weapons and are clearly marked with weapons type on the outside of the missle.
On another note, I remember reading in WMR a while back about the loss of two of the warheads from the Kazakh portion of the Soviet arsenal that were lost of the Somali coast in the early '90s. Those two were recovered by smugglers and allegedly sold to North Korea. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | ||||
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]() Quote:
|
||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|