SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-05-07, 01:33 PM   #1
Bill Nichols
Master of Defense
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,502
Downloads: 125
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by geetrue
I wonder when and if they will ever find the other missing nuclear war heads that have already been accidently dropped. I remember one in Georgia off the coast or near an inlet ... a nuclear depth charge I do believe.

Accidents do happen ... glad this wasn't one of them.

Details here:

http://www.cdi.org/Issues/NukeAccidents/accidents.htm
__________________
My Dangerous Waters website:
Bill Nichols is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-07, 04:00 PM   #2
Iceman
Ace of the Deep
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Mesa AZ, Arizona, USA
Posts: 1,253
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Nichols
Quote:
Originally Posted by geetrue
I wonder when and if they will ever find the other missing nuclear war heads that have already been accidently dropped. I remember one in Georgia off the coast or near an inlet ... a nuclear depth charge I do believe.

Accidents do happen ... glad this wasn't one of them.

Details here:

http://www.cdi.org/Issues/NukeAccidents/accidents.htm
Amazing...read thru some of the accounts to about the 60's...amazing no actual huge nuclear detonations...will finish tonite...thank you for the link Bill.

Don't tell me there's no God after reading some of those accts.
Iceman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-07, 04:26 PM   #3
TLAM Strike
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Rochester, New York
Posts: 8,633
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 6


Quote:
...should have been removed from the plane. Instead, they were mounted on the bomber’s wings...
...CNN says the crew didn't know the weapons were on the bomber...
Ok I know the B-52 is big but for god's sake get up off your lazy @$$ and walk around the plane before taking off!! They do that on the little pointy nose planes. Its not like they were hidden in the bomb bay or anything they were hanging off the wings in plain view.
__________________


TLAM Strike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-07, 07:23 PM   #4
geetrue
Cold War Boomer
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Walla Walla
Posts: 2,837
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TLAM Strike
Quote:
...should have been removed from the plane. Instead, they were mounted on the bomber’s wings...
...CNN says the crew didn't know the weapons were on the bomber...
Ok I know the B-52 is big but for god's sake get up off your lazy @$$ and walk around the plane before taking off!! They do that on the little pointy nose planes. Its not like they were hidden in the bomb bay or anything they were hanging off the wings in plain view.
Perhaps it was the new B-52 stealth bomber and they just didn't see them ...
__________________
geetrue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-07, 07:37 PM   #5
Deep6
Gunner
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 95
Downloads: 14
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by geetrue
Perhaps it was the new B-52 stealth bomber and they just didn't see them ...
Flight of the Old Dog
__________________
Let\'s play Hide and Seek\'n\'Destroy!
Deep6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-07, 12:23 PM   #6
Heibges
Sea Lord
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: San Francisco, California
Posts: 1,633
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by geetrue
Quote:
Originally Posted by TLAM Strike
Quote:
...should have been removed from the plane. Instead, they were mounted on the bomber’s wings...
...CNN says the crew didn't know the weapons were on the bomber...
Ok I know the B-52 is big but for god's sake get up off your lazy @$$ and walk around the plane before taking off!! They do that on the little pointy nose planes. Its not like they were hidden in the bomb bay or anything they were hanging off the wings in plain view.
Perhaps it was the new B-52 stealth bomber and they just didn't see them ...
I'm sure the missles were supposed to be on the plane, just not with real warheads. The Air Force can't be that silly.
__________________
U.Kdt.Hdb B. I. 28) This possibility of using the hydrophone to help in detecting surface ships should, however, be restricted to those cases where the submarine is unavoidably compelled to stay below the surface.

http://www.hackworth.com/
Heibges is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-07, 02:48 PM   #7
Oberon
Lucky Jack
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 25,976
Downloads: 61
Uploads: 20


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Heibges
I'm sure the missles were supposed to be on the plane, just not with real warheads. The Air Force can't be that silly.
:hmm:

Anyway, aren't there still quite a few ICBMs at the bottom in sunken Boomers? K-219 for example, or even 19. I don't think any other country (with the possible exception of Chinas suspected second Xia) has lost a Boomer other than the old USSR.
Oberon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-07, 09:14 PM   #8
Ishmael
Seasoned Skipper
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Morro Bay, Ca.
Posts: 659
Downloads: 79
Uploads: 0
Default

I don't know how the Air Farce runs their NUCWEPS programs, but this would never happen in the Navy. I won't go into the loading and storage procedures here but, suffice to say, any "Special" weapons would immediately be apparent. What is mystifying to me is that a weapons loadout check should be part of a preflight checklist and would show the type of weapons loaded and number in the weapons control console. That and any cursory examination of the weapons themselves that should have presumably been done as part of a visual inspection pre-flight should have raised a red flag as well. War shot ordnance is distinctly different from exercise weapons and are clearly marked with weapons type on the outside of the missle.

On another note, I remember reading in WMR a while back about the loss of two of the warheads from the Kazakh portion of the Soviet arsenal that were lost of the Somali coast in the early '90s. Those two were recovered by smugglers and allegedly sold to North Korea.
Ishmael is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-07, 12:12 PM   #9
TLAM Strike
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Rochester, New York
Posts: 8,633
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 6


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Heibges
Quote:
Originally Posted by geetrue
Quote:
Originally Posted by TLAM Strike
Quote:
...should have been removed from the plane. Instead, they were mounted on the bomber’s wings...
...CNN says the crew didn't know the weapons were on the bomber...
Ok I know the B-52 is big but for god's sake get up off your lazy @$$ and walk around the plane before taking off!! They do that on the little pointy nose planes. Its not like they were hidden in the bomb bay or anything they were hanging off the wings in plain view.
Perhaps it was the new B-52 stealth bomber and they just didn't see them ...
I'm sure the missles were supposed to be on the plane, just not with real warheads. The Air Force can't be that silly.
I'm sure weapons armed with nuclear warheads are painted with a easly reconized color so everyone on the base knows what they are and not to drop them/sit on them/spill coffee on them/etc. In the Russian Navy nuclear torpedoes were painted purple I belive. I would be shocked if the USAF didn't paint the nose cones of their nuclear cruise missiles a color diffrent from other missiles of the same type.
__________________


TLAM Strike is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.