SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-26-07, 08:02 PM   #1
Camaero
The Old Man
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: USA, Massachusetts
Posts: 1,477
Downloads: 18
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skybird
I didn'T believe in virtual cockpits, until I saw that of the Piper Cheyenne (Digital Aviation)

I thought TrackIr was overrated, until I started to use it in FS9 half a year ago.

I now do all my flying in VC exclusively, and with TrackIR.

Where I do not miss it a bit is driving simulators, though. But it is welcomed in IL2 though.
Yeah, TrackIR never worked out well for me in driving simulators either. I guess I just lean with my head too much.

I can not fly without it in IL2 however. I could never keep track of enemy planes, keep track of friendly planes, and keep track of my own plane as well without it. I can hardly believe that there was a time in my IL2 career that I didn't use it! In FSX and FS9 it is pretty cool too, though not quite as important.
__________________
Camaero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-07, 09:28 PM   #2
mbthegreat
Bosun
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: 900 yards off your port side
Posts: 61
Downloads: 3
Uploads: 0
Default

I have always foudn VFR flying in a game really difficult, you just don't have the same ability to view over the dash as it were, and I find myself just using instruments to get the data mattiditude
mbthegreat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-07, 04:43 AM   #3
Skybird
Soaring
 
Skybird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: the mental asylum named Germany
Posts: 42,741
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mbthegreat
I have always foudn VFR flying in a game really difficult, you just don't have the same ability to view over the dash as it were, and I find myself just using instruments to get the data mattiditude
What soft- and hardware-stuff are you using, then? I can estimate my altitude on approach without using instruments, and land with an eye on the speed-needle only.
__________________
If you feel nuts, consult an expert.
Skybird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-07, 03:51 PM   #4
mbthegreat
Bosun
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: 900 yards off your port side
Posts: 61
Downloads: 3
Uploads: 0
Default

FSX, my standard PC and a joystick, I fly IRL and find trying to navigate VFR on FS almost impossible
mbthegreat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-07, 04:48 PM   #5
Officerpuppy
Engineer
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Mansfield, TX
Posts: 213
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

All we need know is for a company to make something for sub sims, maybe like dive planes or something
Officerpuppy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-07, 06:14 PM   #6
Skybird
Soaring
 
Skybird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: the mental asylum named Germany
Posts: 42,741
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mbthegreat
FSX, my standard PC and a joystick, I fly IRL and find trying to navigate VFR on FS almost impossible
Get some decent scenery.
Make sure frames are not to low in VC.
Try TrackIR, zoom factor 0.75 (in FS9 terms).
Get a HOTAS and attach trach-IR stabilizing and view zoom functions to it to use them for quick changes. I can't imagine how to "realistically" fly FS without dedicated input devices, and pedals.

If the problem is perspective, that can be solved.
If the problem is visual detail, it will never match reality, but it can be massively improved.

If you expect it to be like in reality, you probably expect to much from a sim.

If your machine produces low frames with FSX and addons, go back to FS9. This is the simpel reason why I jumped onto FS9 half a year ago, and build it up: if I need to buy a new machine in the next two years, and I use FSX and addon sceneries, I again will have stuttery rrames. But FS9 already is playable now, and on my next rig will run perfetcly smooth. A recipe I already used when I bought FS8 long time after it was released, and never regret it.
__________________
If you feel nuts, consult an expert.
Skybird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-07, 06:33 PM   #7
mbthegreat
Bosun
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: 900 yards off your port side
Posts: 61
Downloads: 3
Uploads: 0
Default

THe problem is perspective mainly I find, I don't have money to spend on yoke / pedals / fake glass cockpit unfourtunatly (do you know how expenisve flying lessons are, christ!)
mbthegreat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-07, 08:12 PM   #8
Chock
Sea Lord
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Under a thermal layer in chilly Olde England
Posts: 1,842
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

If you are having flying lessons, having rudder pedals, a decent stick/yoke similar to the one you use in the aircraft you train in will help massively, and given that that lessons are so costly, anything that you can use to make you more familiar with the physical movements required will be money well spent, as it will likely save you money in the long run, as you master things quicker.

The reason I know this, is because before all those gadgets were available for flight sims when I was learning to fly, I rigged up dummy controls with bungy cords and bits of wood, in order to practice co-ordinating rudder with stick movements, and believe it or not, it really did work! I guess your muscles sort of learn automatic reactions or something. Anyway, whatever the reason, it sure helped, I started lessons on a Monday and went solo on the Friday of the same week after 7 hours and fifteen minutes of dual instruction. But of course it would have been a lot simpler if all those gadgets we take for granted now had been available at the time.

Another trick I did when learning to fly was to read the two best books I could find on on flying, then without referring back to them (unless I got stuck) I wrote out all the chapters in a notebook in my own words, to get all the knowledge straight in my head, that really helped a lot too. Still got that notebook somewhere:rotfl:

And with the more recent trackIR, you can actually sit up and lean forward to see over the cockpit coaming to view the terrain. If you get decent scenery for where you fly based on satellite pictures, it really will help you a lot too. But of course as you probably know, generally speaking, it's harder to fly a sim than it is to fly the real thing.

With regard to costs for aviation, that's one of the reasons I only fly gliders these days in real life - cheaper, much more skill involved than flying a spam can and more fun too. Like they say: If God had wanted us to fly, he'd have given us more money!

Chock
__________________
Chock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-07, 04:11 PM   #9
Skybird
Soaring
 
Skybird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: the mental asylum named Germany
Posts: 42,741
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mbthegreat
THe problem is perspective mainly I find, I don't have money to spend on yoke / pedals / fake glass cockpit unfourtunatly (do you know how expenisve flying lessons are, christ!)
when you say perspective, a solid aircraft module would help you that allows realistic perspective from the pilot'S eyes, so to speak.

A light training aircraft is the Diamond Katana by digital Aviation, with very good viewing possibilities to the front and side, and said well-done VC.

http://www.digital-aviation.de/crjsi...a_da20_01.html
http://www.avsim.com/pages/0307/Katana/Katana.htm
http://www.digital-aviation.de/crjsi...da20_main.html

Also recommended for VFR and good perspective from pilot'S seat: the SIAI Marchetti SF260 by RealAir that I own myself and wholeheartly can recommend. the VC is superior to many 2D cockpits in that the gauges are crystal-clear and the needles move totally smoothly.

http://www.realairsimulations.com/fl...=sf26007_intro
http://www.avsim.com/

Note that the SF260 does not even have a 2D cockpit.

Both have bubble-kind of canopies and are aircraft that are commonly used for VFR flights (the latter also for aerobatics). Both aircraft are available for FS9 and FSX.

If you are a serious simmer, pedals first and TrackIR second should be put onto your investement list.
__________________
If you feel nuts, consult an expert.
Skybird is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.