![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Samurai Navy
![]() Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 597
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
54 ft. No contacts, no sound at station. 55 ft. Contacts, sound at station. 55 ft. Periscope up. Sound contacts, visual contacts, sound at station 54 ft. Periscope up. Visual contacts, no sound contacts, no sound at station. Tested with the Porpoise class sub in the first training mission.
__________________
-AKD |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Rear Admiral
![]() |
![]()
:hmm:
Well, im both right, and wrong. ![]() That said, i think its fixable. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Mar del Plata, Argentina
Posts: 871
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
It's modable adjusting one of the min sensor values, once I get the 1.2 patch I'll make a fix, I have it working at PD with 1.1.
Ref |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Samurai Navy
![]() Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 597
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
If you raise the boat above 55 feet, the AI does not report any contacts, nor can you hear anything using the sonar station yourself, regardless as to whether or not the periscope is raised or lowered.
__________________
-AKD |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Ace of the Deep
![]() Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: No-good Missouri scum
Posts: 1,223
Downloads: 43
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
The sonar depth needs to be raised quite a ways.
I don't mind not getting reports at surface since you'd spot them visually before hearing them due to the surface noise, however much below that we should be having it.
__________________
"When Gary told me he had found Jesus, I thought, Yahoo! We're rich! But it turned out to be something different." - Jack Handey |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Samurai Navy
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Iowa, USA
Posts: 596
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Waited for patch 1.2. Just open Sensors_Sub_Us.sim and search for three values set at -6, -6, -9 for MaxSensorHeight. Change them to -5,-5,-8 and the hydrophones will work at about 44 feet instead of 54 feet.
I did this for patch 1.1 and it worked. Since due to changes and other mods using the same file, you should be able to set those values yourself quite easy. If not, using mini-tweak, I could tell you the values for the adress hex and such. I did not know if this was realistic or not, but I find it more of a convenience. EDIT: I meant -9 to -8. Last edited by Jungman; 04-19-07 at 08:32 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Frogman
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kent, UK
Posts: 292
Downloads: 633
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
Mine show values of -9 -6 -9. Should I be lowering each value by "1"? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Samurai Navy
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Iowa, USA
Posts: 596
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
That maybe be true for after patch 1.2. Yes, just plug in the correct IEEE single point float number (note it is a negative) one less.
Patch 1.1 was -6, -6, -9. So just use 1 less at -5, -8. -8 = c1 00 -5 = c0 a0 Remember they get put in backwards. c1 00 00 00 is really in hex 00 00 00 c1 Technically this makes the passive hydrophones work (manual or use the crew) at about 43 feet deep. Edit: Clarification, 'lowering' the Max value is actually adding a positve '1'. -6 --> -5 aprox depth the sonar will work (all the way to -300 meters). |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|