BANNED: THE SPEECH THE U.N. REFUSED TO HEAR March 29, 2007

[LoBlo]

Who was that and which side was he blabbling for?

[heartc]

*bump*

Not enough hits yet, you delusionist ignorants.

[CptSimFreak]

Interesting...

[ASWnut101]

....very.

[GlobalExplorer]

well ..

[cobalt]

That guy from un watch made me laugh out loud.

[joea]

Originally Posted by heartc

*bump*

Not enough hits yet, you delusionist ignorants.

What did Neal say on the other thread??

Originally Posted by joea

What did Neal say on the other thread??

If you take a look joea, heartc made his comment on 01 APR and Neal spoke today 02 APR. Perhaps you should cut the man a break, and stop baiting him using Neal as your strawman.

[cobalt]

Originally Posted by waste gate

If you take a look joea, heartc made his comment on 01 APR and Neal spoke today 02 APR. Perhaps you should cut the man a break, and stop baiting him using Neal as your strawman.

Cut him a break? Only because he agrees with you on this silly video.

And am I a dilusionist ignorant because I find this man very amusing and for the lack of better words "retarded". And why would you post such ignoramice BS with your capslock key on, like this is some important news.

"They seek to demonize Israeli democracy, to delegitimize the Jewish state, to scapegoat the Jewish people. "

Yes, the UN does all of that. Next thing you know they will create an army to roll into the promised land and give it back to Palestine.

I could quote all the nonsense this man spilled out, but ive already wasted enough time replying.

Originally Posted by cobalt

Cut him a break? Only because he agrees with you on this silly video.

And am I a dilusionist ignorant because I find this man very amusing and for the lack of better words "retarded". And why would you post such ignoramice BS with your capslock key on, like this is some important news.

"They seek to demonize Israeli democracy, to delegitimize the Jewish state, to scapegoat the Jewish people. "

Yes, the UN does all of that. Next thing you know they will create an army to roll into the promised land and give it back to Palestine.

I could quote all the nonsense this man spilled out, but ive already wasted enough time replying.

The point of the video wasn't what the man said. The point was that his views were not going to be heard. The presiding officer made it quite clear that because the statement didn't conform to the PC, political paradigm of the presiding officer's the statement would not be allowed into the record.

I don't know where you hail from but I suspect your country's dedication to free speach isn't worth the paper its written on if it's written down at all.

Which brings me to my second point in my response. Freedom of speach isn't for the freedom of, for lack of a better term, accepted speach. Freedom comes from allowing the unpopular speach from not being squashed. I have often fought for people, who have been my political opposites, their abitlity to speak their minds. You should look back to my posts. Some of those people are no longer here.

My objection to joea's post is the use of the owners opinion after the fact. For that he needs to be cut a break.

[SUBMAN1]

Originally Posted by waste gate

The point of the video wasn't what the man said. The point was that his views were not going to be heard. The presiding officer made it quite clear that because the statement didn't conform to the PC, political paradigm of the presiding officer's the statement would not be allowed into the record.

I don't know where you hail from but I suspect your country's dedication to free speach isn't worth the paper its written on if it's written down at all.

Which brings me to my second point in my response. Freedom of speach isn't for the freedom of, for lack of a better term, accepted speach. Freedom comes from allowing the unpopular speach from not being squashed. I have often fought for people, who have been my political opposites, their abitlity to speak their minds. You should look back to my posts. Some of those people are no longer here.

My objection to joea's post is the use of the owners opinion after the fact. For that he needs to be cut a break.

Well said.

-S

[Takeda Shingen]

Ladies and gentlemen, this is a first-rate example of what not to do when conversing on SubSim. You may express your views, but refrain from overt hostility. It is proper candor. It is good manner. It is forum ettiquite. It is the rule on SubSim.

This thread will be locked. I do not care what your politics are. I do not care where you stand on Social Security. I do not care what you think of the United Nations. I do care that you behave within the forum perameters. We are well outside of them now.