SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Silent Hunter 3 - 4 - 5 > Silent Hunter 4: Wolves of the Pacific
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-30-07, 01:06 PM   #1
Bahger
Watch
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 27
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

The BATTLEFIELD series is infamous for its bugs but it's well-supported with patches. You are the only person I've ever encountered (both pro- and con- the game) who has never used the words "Battlefield" and "bug" in the same sentence. Frequently.

The relaunch of FALCON as ALLIED FORCE required tremendous patience as the devs labored over bug-squishing. We are now ten patches in and it's great.

GHOST RECON ADVANCED WARFARE was released to howls of protest over buggy AI and mission glitches. Five patches later, the game seems to work just fine.

Right now, I'm playing S.T.A.L.K.E.R. and enjoying the heck out of it depite bugs so serious that, until a patch arrived this week, I couldn't even quicksave. There is still work to be done.

Here's an obscure one (to US audiences, anyway): BRIAN LARA CRICKET 2007: Promising game with buggy catching dynamics requiring a patch.

Having said all that, I've shelved SHIV until the TDC is fixed. Which it will be, I reckon, partly thanks to Neal and the community here.
Bahger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-07, 01:22 PM   #2
Immacolata
Grey Wolf
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 798
Downloads: 3
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fastfed
LMAO!! Even WW2 online right out of the gate was more playable IMO.
Battlefield 2 and then this? Right there I think you lost any credibility, and your argument is just a thinly veiled pointing of fingers. BF2 and ESPECIALLY WW2 were rather buggy and BF2 actually got more broke with each patch.
__________________

"The power of the executive to cast a man into prison without formulating any charge known to the law, and particularly to deny him the judgment of his peers, is in the highest degree odious, and the foundation of all totalitarian government whether Nazi or Communist."
- W. Churchill

Last edited by Gizzmoe; 03-30-07 at 01:56 PM.
Immacolata is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-07, 01:32 PM   #3
sea enemy
Mate
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 52
Downloads: 3
Uploads: 0
Default

Age of Sail 2 was buggier than a baitshop. And, the sad part of it is, it was NEVER fixed...I've seen alpha versions of games that were in a more complete state.

After Age of Sail 2, nothing else really seems that bad.
sea enemy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-07, 04:34 AM   #4
ubatsnalle
Bilge Rat
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sea enemy
Age of Sail 2 was buggier than a baitshop. And, the sad part of it is, it was NEVER fixed...I've seen alpha versions of games that were in a more complete state.

After Age of Sail 2, nothing else really seems that bad.
I will second this statement.

This post is not really hitting at the original poster of this thread in particular, it is more of a general comment on the behaviour of players on message boards. Other games which definately deserves mentioning here is

- Destroyer Command
- Neverwinter Nights 2
- The Guild 2
- Battlefield 2 (This one even managed to introduce new issues on par with the 'a' button bug in its patches)

In addition to this I do not fully support the symtomatic 'typical UBI crap' whining which is common on internet messageboards. My observations of 15 years worth of computer gaming accross 3 different platforms is that any company will release unfinished games with quite similar frequency. I do not even think it has gotten that much worse with the introduction of downloadable patches a couple of years back.

The trick as a player is to manage your own expectations, remember that patience is a virtue and that throwing eggs on messageboards is not. The trick is to make constructive critisism in a polite and mature way written in proper English.
ubatsnalle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-07, 01:33 PM   #5
DaMaGe007
Watch Officer
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 338
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Black and white 1+2
X2, X3 Reunion (X3 was worse than X2 just)

Both got patches on or around realease, and were flamed heavily.

Atlease X2,X3 eventually got finished, I wont buy another Black and White game.

Last edited by DaMaGe007; 03-30-07 at 02:23 PM.
DaMaGe007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-07, 01:44 PM   #6
Ark
Samurai Navy
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Fresno, CA.
Posts: 581
Downloads: 95
Uploads: 0
Default

Fastfed, if you think SHIV is buggier than WWII Online v1.0, than you did not play WWII Online v1.0.

WWII Online was the worst mess I have ever seen at release. What keeps me playing is the great support by CRS, the fairly steady stream of patches/feature updates, and the community.
__________________
Ark
--------------
Vista 64-bit SP1
Asus P6T Deluxe mobo
Core i7 920 @ 3.8ghz
6GB G.Skill DDR3 1600
Evga GTX 285 SSC
SB X-FI Fatality
640GB WD "Black"
Dell 3007WFP-HC 30" LCD / Acer 23" H233H
Ark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-07, 01:59 PM   #7
fastfed
Grey Wolf
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 786
Downloads: 254
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ark
Fastfed, if you think SHIV is buggier than WWII Online v1.0, than you did not play WWII Online v1.0.

WWII Online was the worst mess I have ever seen at release. What keeps me playing is the great support by CRS, the fairly steady stream of patches/feature updates, and the community.
Fellow WW2 onliner???

I will PM you, I was joking about that one, how is that game these days? Played about 6 months ago last for a trial..
fastfed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-07, 02:03 PM   #8
Faamecanic
Ace of the Deep
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Off your Stb side with good solution
Posts: 1,065
Downloads: 44
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fastfed
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ark
Fastfed, if you think SHIV is buggier than WWII Online v1.0, than you did not play WWII Online v1.0.

WWII Online was the worst mess I have ever seen at release. What keeps me playing is the great support by CRS, the fairly steady stream of patches/feature updates, and the community.
Fellow WW2 onliner???

I will PM you, I was joking about that one, how is that game these days? Played about 6 months ago last for a trial..
Another WWIIOL'er here..... 14e Regiment de Parachutest..... 2nd year playing and I will tell you even as recently as the last major patch over christmas holiday, CRS really stepped in it (10 fps, server crashes...) 1.26 is MUCH better and 1.27 is shaping up.
Faamecanic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-07, 02:12 PM   #9
Ark
Samurai Navy
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Fresno, CA.
Posts: 581
Downloads: 95
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fastfed
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ark
Fastfed, if you think SHIV is buggier than WWII Online v1.0, than you did not play WWII Online v1.0.

WWII Online was the worst mess I have ever seen at release. What keeps me playing is the great support by CRS, the fairly steady stream of patches/feature updates, and the community.
Fellow WW2 onliner???

I will PM you, I was joking about that one, how is that game these days? Played about 6 months ago last for a trial..
Yep, been playing since release.

31st Wrecking Crew.

I can't remember how the game was 6 months ago (it all blends together, hehe), but it is still a LOT of fun for me.
__________________
Ark
--------------
Vista 64-bit SP1
Asus P6T Deluxe mobo
Core i7 920 @ 3.8ghz
6GB G.Skill DDR3 1600
Evga GTX 285 SSC
SB X-FI Fatality
640GB WD "Black"
Dell 3007WFP-HC 30" LCD / Acer 23" H233H
Ark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-07, 01:49 PM   #10
Sldghammer
Watch
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 18
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

I gotta agree with Immacolata.

WWIIOnline out of the gate was a POS that almost sank the company. They sold IIRC 50000+ copies in shops and the vast majority were returned. I think they had to extend the "trial" period by 6 months until they got it somewhat playable.

Does SH4 meet the expectations of the hard core simmers? It's getting there.

Is is playable out of the box for the average player who probably only wants to go out and blow up stuff. Yup.

Will it be greatly improved soon? I think so so I'm not giving up on it.
Sldghammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-07, 01:49 PM   #11
Jace11
Seasoned Skipper
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 683
Downloads: 104
Uploads: 1
Default

Ha, at least Age of Sail 2 had quite nice graphics for the time...

I agree it was bugged and Akela never fixed it but it was alright to play for me anyway, I did end up shelving it though due to lack of depth.

I don't think it is as bad as SH4 though..
Jace11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-07, 01:57 PM   #12
fastfed
Grey Wolf
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 786
Downloads: 254
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Immacolata
Quote:
Originally Posted by fastfed
LMAO!! Even WW2 online right out of the gate was more playable IMO.
Battlefield 2 and then this? Right there I think you lost any credibility, and your argument is just a thinly veiled pointing of fingers. BF2 and ESPECIALLY WW2 were rather buggy and BF2 actually got more broke with each patch. Go away, troll.
Go away troll?? I might of been exaggerating a little with WW2online.. They still haven't fixed that game..

I am 27 years old and have been playing games since Pole position on attari and Silent Service on my commodore..

The bottom line is I have never put a game away after buying it until SH4, I don't know what bugs you're talking about with BF2, because I played the game from day one all the way until the many patches after it. I didn't notice the bugs until reading forums and the readme's on the patches..

Nothing has even been such a disappointment until SH4 and thats the truth!
fastfed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-07, 08:35 AM   #13
Lionman
Torpedoman
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dartmouth, Devon UK
Posts: 120
Downloads: 2
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fastfed
Quote:
Originally Posted by Immacolata
Quote:
Originally Posted by fastfed
LMAO!! Even WW2 online right out of the gate was more playable IMO.
Battlefield 2 and then this? Right there I think you lost any credibility, and your argument is just a thinly veiled pointing of fingers. BF2 and ESPECIALLY WW2 were rather buggy and BF2 actually got more broke with each patch. Go away, troll.
Go away troll?? I might of been exaggerating a little with WW2online.. They still haven't fixed that game..

I am 27 years old and have been playing games since Pole position on attari and Silent Service on my commodore..

The bottom line is I have never put a game away after buying it until SH4, I don't know what bugs you're talking about with BF2, because I played the game from day one all the way until the many patches after it. I didn't notice the bugs until reading forums and the readme's on the patches..

Nothing has even been such a disappointment until SH4 and thats the truth!
I am 6000 years old and have been playing games since the legendary "Tryanosaurus Racer" from the now defunct Silurian Studios, on an early model low RAM alpha model stone circle which I put together myself from Welsh blue stone - so what beats me is how cool some of these new fangled video game thingees you kids have now really are! Submarines aye? Marvellous idea! Sure would have helped hunting stegasori in-water! Now that's what I CALL a "super-lunch-hunter".

However, although I have searched far and wide above and below the waves, so far I haven't found a single wolf, so obviously you are right about there being plenty of bugs as yet. I guess I'll just sit here by my camp fire until it's dark enough to navigate by the stars again. Anyway, I hears me a rumour that them visigoths might be a'coming this way . . . . . better load them bow tubes agin!

OK - seriously shipmates - I am 60+ and my first PC was the legendary "BBC B" which was, in its day, "state-of-the-art" because it had coloured text (!) but mine was eventually re-tro-fitted with 128K (!) of "sideways RAM" as they called it back then, an early GUI, a Viglen mouse and metal boxed twin 5.5" disk drives with their own second extra computer, a zilog ZX80 chip! The office software was the "Perfect Software Suite" and I used to play wire frame DOS flight sims on a black screen! Now THAT took imagination and persistence.

So I am pretty tolerant of bugs in early releases of contemporary games now. I still find it a miracle that all those trillions of lines of code and blizzards of data can produce a believable stormy ocean and convincing weather, also perhaps, I am considerably more patient than I once was. Oh and in between there was a professional career on and under the real ocean, so for me, virtual voyages pander to a profound nostalgia . . . . once you have lived on, under and by it, the ocean's grip never really let's you go again. It's a jealous and dangerous mistress but the most ancient thing our DNA knows and the love runs deep indeed . . .
__________________
\"The Battlefield may be virtual, but the experience is always real.\"

Last edited by Lionman; 03-31-07 at 02:15 PM.
Lionman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-07, 06:26 PM   #14
malkuth74
Sonar Guy
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 377
Downloads: 20
Uploads: 0
Default

Black And White 2 (POS still to this day)
The Movies (read forums, had alot of same issues SHIV have)
Star Trek Legacy (dont even ask)
Pacific Storm (awful AI, only 1 patch so far and didn't fix AI)
Midevil Total war II (AI lackluster, Two handed sword bug still not fixed ETC ETC)
BattleField 2 You so proudly bost about
Patch 1.1 Readme

Patch v1.01
================================================== ======================

Fixed an issue that caused the Multiplayer Browser to become unresponsive.

Fixed an issue where some game controls were not available to be rebound within the Options menu.

Fixed an issue with increasing performance degradation on servers.

Fixed a problem with shader caching on client/host : after the first
map in a rotation, shaders would be loaded on the fly during gameplay.

Fixed a crash with rebinding LMB

Fixed a problem that caused environment mapping to not appear on
reflective surfaces.

Fixed a crash that happened when a client picks up a kit that doesn't
exist anymore.

Fixed a problem with AI when the game was paused for a long time: bots
would become unresponsive and also shoot more accurately.

LOD distances tweaked on certain objects.

I stoped playing after Patch 1.4 (sure thier are more now.)

World Of warcraft Patch notes (IE ITS AT 2.0)
http://www.worldofwarcraft.com/patchnotes/


And by the way SHIV is playable out of the box just like all the others.
__________________

malkuth74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-07, 06:44 PM   #15
minsc_tdp
XO
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 411
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fastfed
LMAO!! Even WW2 online right out of the gate was more playable IMO.
Now that's a low blow. Can't say I disagree, but a low blow.

It's hard to compare FPS bugs to this sort of game. Especially not the level of HL2/COH/WOW which are much, much larger projects.

Hopefully Ubi will step up to the plate and resolve this.
minsc_tdp is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.